View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dani9batan
Joined: 19 Jan 2012 Posts: 218 Location: Madrid (Spain)
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:57 pm Post subject: Waking in the morning... |
|
|
dani9batan wrote:
Three pictures taken with Contax Distagon T* 2,8/28 and Kodak Tri-X 400.
I hope you like it.
1/
2/
3/
_________________ Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Contax 167MT
Contax Distagon T* 2,8/28
Contax Planar T* 1,7/50 (x2)
Contax Planar T* 1,4/85
Contax Sonnar T* 2,8/135
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
davidbrat
Joined: 18 Aug 2009 Posts: 117 Location: Between France & Spain...
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
davidbrat wrote:
I always thought Madrid was (is!) a photogenic city Great results, I really like the last one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
izvar
Joined: 17 Feb 2011 Posts: 252 Location: Moldova
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
izvar wrote:
Like! 1st and 2nd are my favorites! _________________ “The hardest thing of all is to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if there is no cat.”
― Confucius |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mmelvis
Joined: 24 May 2010 Posts: 1326 Location: Florida,USA
Expire: 2015-05-09
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2012 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
mmelvis wrote:
Great looking scooter shot |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
mmelvis wrote: |
Great looking scooter shot |
+1, my fave in the set. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dani9batan
Joined: 19 Jan 2012 Posts: 218 Location: Madrid (Spain)
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
dani9batan wrote:
Thanks!! _________________ Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Contax 167MT
Contax Distagon T* 2,8/28
Contax Planar T* 1,7/50 (x2)
Contax Planar T* 1,4/85
Contax Sonnar T* 2,8/135
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bob van Sikorski
Joined: 12 Jan 2009 Posts: 287 Location: Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bob van Sikorski wrote:
i didnt remember to TriX have such massive contrast. did you use some bigger unsharp masking, or it is just my bad memory? _________________ Rokkor (MD 45/2.0, MC PF 50/1.7), Porst Color Reflex MC Auto 55/1.2, Jupiter 135/3.5
Minolta X-700, Minolta Dynax 4, Flexaret IIa (later version), Flexaret VI
Voigtländer Avus 9x12 (1927-1935 version)
Epson V500 + VueScan/Linux + RawTherapee 4.x + GIMP/wavelett sharpen plugin
Meopta Magnifax III (up to 6x9) + Opemus III (up to 6x6), Rodenstock Rodagon 50/2.8, Meopta Anaret 105/4.5
Proud user of czech films! company homepage: foma.cz, buy here: fomafoto.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dani9batan
Joined: 19 Jan 2012 Posts: 218 Location: Madrid (Spain)
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
dani9batan wrote:
Hi Bob van Sikorski.
I haven't used unsharp mask.
I've scanned with Epson V200, I pushed the contrast slightly -very slightly- and I resized with Photoshop CS5.
PS: developed with D-76 stock _________________ Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Contax 167MT
Contax Distagon T* 2,8/28
Contax Planar T* 1,7/50 (x2)
Contax Planar T* 1,4/85
Contax Sonnar T* 2,8/135
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bob van Sikorski
Joined: 12 Jan 2009 Posts: 287 Location: Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bob van Sikorski wrote:
oh yeah, thats the combination: contrast in cs5 (you can see clearly that you enhanced contrast relly only very slightly) plus stock developer (i developed triX only in 1+1 so i usualy had not so contrasty results). thanks ofr info _________________ Rokkor (MD 45/2.0, MC PF 50/1.7), Porst Color Reflex MC Auto 55/1.2, Jupiter 135/3.5
Minolta X-700, Minolta Dynax 4, Flexaret IIa (later version), Flexaret VI
Voigtländer Avus 9x12 (1927-1935 version)
Epson V500 + VueScan/Linux + RawTherapee 4.x + GIMP/wavelett sharpen plugin
Meopta Magnifax III (up to 6x9) + Opemus III (up to 6x6), Rodenstock Rodagon 50/2.8, Meopta Anaret 105/4.5
Proud user of czech films! company homepage: foma.cz, buy here: fomafoto.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yebisu
Joined: 13 Feb 2011 Posts: 1299
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yebisu wrote:
Bob van Sikorski wrote: |
i didnt remember to TriX have such massive contrast. did you use some bigger unsharp masking, or it is just my bad memory? |
]
I noticed the contrast too. My Trix never looks like this. Still nice though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hexi
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 1631 Location: France
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hexi wrote:
Very nice b&w , the high contrast doesn't bother me, i like the composition of the scooter one and the autoportrait with the Seat _________________ Happy owner and user of :
SLR's > Contax Aria - RX
DSLR > Canon 5D
Lenses : C/Y Planar 1.4/50 - Distagon 2.8/35 - Planar 1.4/85
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sonnar85 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bhargav
Joined: 24 Nov 2011 Posts: 938 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bhargav wrote:
mmelvis wrote: |
Great looking scooter shot |
+1 _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/58547200@N00/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|