View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
steevithak
Joined: 21 Apr 2011 Posts: 27 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:23 am Post subject: Vivitar Professional 180mm f2.8 |
|
|
steevithak wrote:
I recently acquired a Vivitar Professional 180mm f2.8 lens and I'm trying to track down any information about it. There's almost no trace of it online and none of the printed lens guides I've looked at include this lens. I know of only one other Vivitar Professional series lens, the 135mm f1.5, but I don't know if the two share anything in common.
The lens has an M42 screw mount, tripod mounting ring, extending lens shade, and 8 blade iris. The serial number is 1000002 and doesn't correspond to any manufacturer on the Vivitar serial number lists.
A local used lens dealer I showed it to recently was unable to find it in his printed guides and concluded that it was some sort of one-off lens, perhaps a prototype or custom job.
Has anyone else ever run across this lens before? I'm curious if it's really that rare.
You can see more photos in my flickr gallery:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/steevithak/sets/72157627309803137/detail/
-Steve
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
No info, but wondered how much it weighed and how big the front element is. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 7:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Fascinating! Where's Big Dawg?! _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Interesting, wonder if it's a copy of the Sonnar design or whether it has a different optical scheme?
Not many manufacturers made a 2.8/180, there's the obvious CZJ Sonnar, the Nikkor, Leica Elmarit, can't think of any others off the top of my head. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2463 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
Sigma, and Olympus also both made 180 2.8 lenses.
The design looks like it could possible be Tokina made. But that's just a guess. _________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
exaklaus
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 1633 Location: Niederrhein, Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 8:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
exaklaus wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Interesting, wonder if it's a copy of the Sonnar design or whether it has a different optical scheme?
Not many manufacturers made a 2.8/180, there's the obvious CZJ Sonnar, the Nikkor, Leica Elmarit, can't think of any others off the top of my head. |
Isco made one, too.
Anyway, that Vivitar seems to be a rare bird.
Klaus _________________ my Ebay auctions
Canon 5D II,
Fuji GW690III, Fuji G617, Fujifilm X-E1
Bessaflex TM
Tachihara 4"x5"
Summilux-R 1:1,4/50
Canon FD 85mm 1:1,2
Color-Heliar 75mm F2.5 SL
www.autoselbstfotografie.de
www.classic-cameras-and-lenses.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Probably is a Tokina, looks very similar in details to the Tokina made Vivitar 200mm on the right of this pic:
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steevithak
Joined: 21 Apr 2011 Posts: 27 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
steevithak wrote:
Quote: |
No info, but wondered how much it weighed and how big the front element is. |
It's big. The filter size is 86mm. If I get time, I'll try to weigh it tomorrow. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
steevithak wrote: |
Quote: |
No info, but wondered how much it weighed and how big the front element is. |
It's big. The filter size is 86mm. If I get time, I'll try to weigh it tomorrow. |
Comparible to my 180/2.8 Sonnar I expect as the front element is similar size.. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Smull
Joined: 02 Jun 2008 Posts: 20 Location: Paris
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 6:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Smull wrote:
I'm getting into this topic because I own a nice CZJ 180/2,8. As you probably know, it's a medium format lens : it's big and heavy!
This Vivitar is made for M42 and is as big...
So my question : why those lenses are so heavy?? Are there "not so heavy" 180mm somewhere?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2011 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
One reason they are so heavy is the Sonnar design has a great big lump of glass in the middle. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Smull
Joined: 02 Jun 2008 Posts: 20 Location: Paris
|
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2011 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Smull wrote:
Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
steevithak
Joined: 21 Apr 2011 Posts: 27 Location: Dallas, TX
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
steevithak wrote:
I finally got a chance to weight this thing and here's the result:
1,408 g (3lbs 1.7oz)
So, very heavy but lighter than the only other Vivitar Professional lens, the 135mm f/1.5 which weighed in at 4lbs 8oz.
Still haven't found any evidence of other examples of this 180mm f/2.8, even searching lens reviews in old camera mags via Google book search.
I created camera-wiki.org pages for the two Vivitar Professional lenses and will add more info on the 180mm as I find out anything.
Vivitar Professional 135mm f/1.5
http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Vivitar_Professional_135mm_f/1.5
Vivitar Professional 180mm f/2.8
http://camera-wiki.org/wiki/Vivitar_Professional_180mm_f/2.8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
First one what I seen! Congrats! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1387 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2011 4:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
Attila wrote: |
First one what I seen! |
Judging by its serial number, at least one other sample exists _________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pdccameras
Joined: 23 Aug 2009 Posts: 825 Location: Putnam, CT
Expire: 2014-08-11
|
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
pdccameras wrote:
Nice find! The 180mm focal length is nice for those compressed depth of field model shots like you shot for your Flickr stream. I think this lens is very well suited to medium distances and really renders people (skin tones, etc.) well.
I checked a bunch of period catalogs I have and a book dedicated to Vivitar with no luck, not even a mention of the pro series. Great job on the Wiki, by the way!
Best,
Paul _________________ Canon 5D Mii, Canon 40D, Canon 350D IR, Sony A7 Mii, Sony Alpha-6000, a ton of lenses: AF & MF and too many cameras to count, all formats: 110 - 4x5. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2011 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
It's probably a Tokina judging by the barrel stylings, but I can find no info on a 2.8/180 made by Tokina.
Did Nikon make their 2.8/180 themselves or could they have had it made for them by Tokina?
Could this be the Nikon lens in different clothing? _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2011 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
It's probably a Tokina judging by the barrel stylings, but I can find no info on a 2.8/180 made by Tokina.
Did Nikon make their 2.8/180 themselves or could they have had it made for them by Tokina?
Could this be the Nikon lens in different clothing? |
Woah! Slow down there with the conclusions partner! What on earth could possibly make you think that Tokina made the 180/2.8 for Nikon? Nikon made their own lenses. I can only think of one modern AF lens which some believe is a Tokina lens re-branded... _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Fri Aug 19, 2011 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
It's probably a Tokina judging by the barrel stylings, but I can find no info on a 2.8/180 made by Tokina.
Did Nikon make their 2.8/180 themselves or could they have had it made for them by Tokina?
Could this be the Nikon lens in different clothing? |
Woah! Slow down there with the conclusions partner! What on earth could possibly make you think that Tokina made the 180/2.8 for Nikon? Nikon made their own lenses. I can only think of one modern AF lens which some believe is a Tokina lens re-branded... |
No, no, no! Not drawing any conclusions, just musing!
The Viv 2.8/180 looks like other Vivs made by Tokina so is probably made by Tokina.
I was just trying to think of other Japanese 2.8/180s of the same vintage.
I was just wondering out loud, it's not to be taken as gospel, it's intended to stimulate debate!
Sorry for any misunderstanding there. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Hey, no worries! The problem with forums like this is that everything appears on Google, and if people read your thoughts and believe it to be gospel, all of sudden ebayers start selling Tokina lenses as Nikkors and the prices go through the roof
Similar things have happened recently with mis-informed people believing that the cheap Japanese Helios 135/2.8 lenses are copies of CZJ Sonnars and any Chinon lens being listed as Tomiokas _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
This is a fascinating lens. Definitely no relation to the nikkor though, it is much bigger and heavier. It is more like the Sonnar, which I also have.
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Hmm, I wonder how people came to the conclusion the Helios is a Sonnar copy? Because the Russian Helios are Zeiss copies?
Did Tokina ever sell a 2.8/180 branded Tokina? _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Hmm, I wonder how people came to the conclusion the Helios is a Sonnar copy? Because the Russian Helios are Zeiss copies?
Did Tokina ever sell a 2.8/180 branded Tokina? |
Helios 44 is a copy of the Biotar. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Indeed it is, I have several, great lens. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
Smull wrote: |
I'm getting into this topic because I own a nice CZJ 180/2,8. As you probably know, it's a medium format lens : it's big and heavy!
This Vivitar is made for M42 and is as big...
So my question : why those lenses are so heavy?? Are there "not so heavy" 180mm somewhere?? |
Yes,
Leica Elmarit 2.8/180mm MKII..
Filterthread 67mm
1.8m-infinity
integrated lens hood
lenght 121mm
weight 810g.
no need for a tripod collar.
Cheers
Henry _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|