View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
marry
Joined: 21 Apr 2008 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 4:59 pm Post subject: Vivitar 200mm 3.5 |
|
|
marry wrote:
Hey!
I can buy this lens with a Nikon mount for € 25,-. Is this a good price for this lens? Does it have any resale value?
Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
This is a very cheap lens, you can't really sell on much higher price. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
Hi Marry
Take a pass on this one. Watch for the Viv Series 1 200mm f3. A much stronger performer with a cult following. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Riku
Joined: 23 May 2007 Posts: 1059 Location: Finland
Expire: 2017-04-30
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Riku wrote:
I would buy it for 25€. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richard_D
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2378 Location: Faversham Kent UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Richard_D wrote:
You probably won't make a profit on a purchase but if you want a nice 200mm the Ai'd NikkorQ's tend to sell for very little and it's an underated lens. _________________ Richard
The interesting bit:
Nikkors: 20mm f2.8 AIS, 24mm f2.8 AIS, 28mm f2.8 AIS, 35mm f2 AIS, 50mm f1.4 AI, 50mm f1.48AI, 50m f2 AI,
55mm f3.5 AI'd, 105mm f4 AI, 135mm f2.8 AI'd, 135mm f3.5 AI'd, 200mm f4 AI'd .
Nikon E Series: 100mm f2.8 .
Soviet Nikon Mount: Zenitar 16mm f2.8, Arsat/arax/photex 85mm T&S f2.8 .
Other: Asahi Super Takumar 55 mm f2 (M42) ,Tamron 300mm f5.6 SP, Tamron 500mm f8 SP.
DSLR: Nikon D700. 35mm SLRsNikon FE, Pentax S1a.
TLR: Rolliecord II.
Sub-Minature: Pentax Auto 110, 18mm f2.8, 24mm f2.8, 50mm f2.8.
More to come... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Agree with Andy and Richard. There's also a great Jupiter-21.
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ironfan
Joined: 12 Jan 2008 Posts: 31 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 3:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ironfan wrote:
Attila wrote: |
This is a very cheap lens, you can't really sell on much higher price. |
I don't know what you mean by cheap? If its that 25 euros is cheap, then you are spot on my friend. I bought a Komine made Vivitar 200mm f3.5 for less than this and what I got was the best 200mm I've used so far. Its quite sharp even wide open, better than a Cosina or Tamron AD2 both of which I've owned and tested. The build is anything but cheap and in reality oozes quality. The colour rendition and contrast is good and the bokeh from its 8 aperture blades is not too shabby neither.
The all metal body with its nice rubber grip and beautifully smooth focusing together with the felt-lined sliding sunhood just about puts the icing on this fine cake of a lens. Don't confuse this Vivitar with the cheap nasty offerings put out by that company after ownership changes in the 1980's.
The only cheap thing about this lens is the silly low prices they often fetch on eBay. This is a lens (assuming it works correctly) that you'll want to keep and not sell, after all 25 euros is not a great deal of money for a lens of this build. Please note the serial numbers must start with 28and not 37 as thats a Tokina and I can't vouch for those one's.
To underline my comments, I have rushed outside and taken a quick photo using this lens, the subject car is appx 40m away with aperture @ f5.6 straight off the card.
_________________ Shoots with:
Pentax K-x
Pentax-A 50mm f1.7
Pentacon 135mm f2.8
Sigma 17-70mm A/F
Vivitar-kiron 70-150mm f3.8
Tamron SP90mm Macto f2.8
Pentax DAL 55-300mm.
Teleplus K macro focusing 2x TC
Teleplus KAX macro focusing 2x TC.
Last edited by Ironfan on Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:31 am; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
All above are so true what you wrote here , this is a nice lens, but not respected by people. I have also one copy and I believe I will not sell ever no reason to sell for 20-30 EUR. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Russ
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Russ wrote:
Also, the old Vivitar Series 1 AF lens (Komine & Cosina) is a very good performer.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/38463255@N00/2341432705/in/set-72157604141572154/
Kiron Kid |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Early AF perhaps made like MF lenses ... and provide same good quality.. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Russ
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Russ wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Early AF perhaps made like MF lenses ... and provide same good quality.. |
Attila
You are correct. That lens (did you see it?) is of early auto-focus technology. But optically, it ROCKS! In testing, it handily beat out the Nikon 180mm lens.
Kiron Kid |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
This is really a surprise .. Nikkor 180mm f2.8 ED one of my favourite lens. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Russ
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Russ wrote:
Attila wrote: |
This is really a surprise .. Nikkor 180mm f2.8 ED one of my favourite lens. |
Yeah, amazing, isn't it. That Nikon 180, is no slouch.
Kiron Kid |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Yes, amazing! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 1767 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisLilley wrote:
Russ wrote: |
But optically, it ROCKS! In testing, it handily beat out the Nikon 180mm lens.
|
Pointer to that test? _________________ Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ai'ed, AiS
Camera: Nikon D90, D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 K, AI'ed | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | ЛЗОС (LZOS) Юпитер-9 (Jupiter-9) 85mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 SL | Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5 pre-Ai, Ai'ed | Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 | Schneider Kreuznach Componon 105mm f/5.6 | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED AiS | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Russ
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Russ wrote:
ChrisLilley wrote: |
Russ wrote: |
But optically, it ROCKS! In testing, it handily beat out the Nikon 180mm lens.
|
Pointer to that test? |
I'm looking for the site. I printed out the test result numbers, just have to relocate the actual site. I was quite surprised myself. I've only used my Viv S-1 200, a couple of times, but the slides sure looked good.
Kiron Kid |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jekku
Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Posts: 42 Location: Turku, Finland
|
Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jekku wrote:
Bump for this.
Someone is selling this lens on a Finnish camera forum for 100€.
A bit overpriced perhaps?
Don't know who manufactured it though. _________________ Your everyday tourist.
--------------------------
WWW: niklasjerva.net
Blog: Photographical strut
Photos: flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Pricing is dependent on type of mount. I don't suppose the AF version would command as much as a MF version. I have seen the MF version; the Series 1 f/3, go for well over $200 in M42 mount. Other mounts are usually considerably less money.
I too would like to see the aforementioned test results. I have the f/3 lens and love it; it's one of my three favorite manual lenses. On my camera it has considerable purple fringing which I think is a sensor/camera specific thing. Boomer has used this lens on his Canon with much less issue. Nevertheless, I've found the fringing very easy to correct in post processing. Other than that, focusing can be difficult and needs to be precise. I had trouble with it initially, but have gotten quite good, so it must have been something that I just needed to get accustomed to through practice. The lens is very sharp and the bokeh excellent.
If interested, I have a gallery of sample pictures here:
http://www.pbase.com/mdlempert/vivitar200mms1
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jekku
Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Posts: 42 Location: Turku, Finland
|
Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jekku wrote:
Thanks for your input and info.
Forgot to mention it's a Nikon MF mount. So maybe that's the reason.
The seller says it's a Viv 200/3.5.
Here's a pic from the seller:
_________________ Your everyday tourist.
--------------------------
WWW: niklasjerva.net
Blog: Photographical strut
Photos: flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Okay, I've gone back and looked and see now how the subject has gone astray. You did ask initially about the standard f3.5 lens, but then someone introduced the Series 1 AF as an option. I added onto that discussion. The lens you are asking about is the very common 200mm f/3.5 of which most were made by Komine. I'm not so sure the price is anything special. Check on ebay - there are usually many listed, and even better yet, check completed listings for any Nikon mounts that have sold. When i was looking, I saw them in Minolta mount for $10-$20. An M42 will go somewhat higher.
As for the quality of the lens, many people speak well of it. I have two; one in Minolta mount that I've had since the 70s, and one in M42 purchased more recently. Since I have the Series 1 lens, I don't use the M42 version anymore as it didn't strike me as anything outstanding, but was certainly a good lens. However, I do use the Minolta mount one on occasion for close up photography. I have found that when used with a macro converter it performs quite well. I should also mention that the macro converter I use is actually the match mated one sold with the Series 1 90mm. It just works well with other lenses.
The gallery I have with close up picture from the f3.5 lens can be seen here: http://www.pbase.com/mdlempert/vivitar200mm
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
The Komine built Vivitar 200mm f3.5 gives pretty good results with a pleasing saturation....but I really don't see it it being anywhere in the league of the Nikkor 180mm f2.8 ED AIS or the suburb Nikkor 180mm f2.8 ED-IF AF or the ED-IF D...
Nikkor 180mm f2.8 ED AI-S 100% crop & shot through the glass of a window
Vivitar 200mm f3.5
The Vivitar Series 1 200mm f3 however has a particular uniqueness and a pleasing bokeh wide open...and close focuses to 1.2 meters
Stopping down sharpens at the next stop and continues to get sharper til f11 100% crop & shot through the glass of a window.
_________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Boomer: Good to see you here again. Are you still having good experience regarding the blue/purple fringing? _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
Spring is here...so been busy here and up at Marrowstone....and the weather has also been good for some excellent spring sailing....actually as mild as our winter was,the sailing has been great since last spring.
I usually try to avoid a bright harsh background...but sometimes no matter how careful, I do get some aberrations.
_________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
a20010494
Joined: 15 Feb 2010 Posts: 396 Location: Perú.
|
Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
a20010494 wrote:
I'm not trying to bash, but to my eye the in-focus area of the vivitar looks sharper than nikon's. _________________ www.estudiocaleidoscopio.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
Probably had more time to nail the focus,but could have done better if I had more time to really nail the focus or used a flash....hummingbirds don't sit still to often and it presented itself well for the DOF in the shot... and depending on the time of day and the amount of harsh lighting nearer mid-day as well as keeping an angle closer to 45 degrees shooting through a window all come into play...and the 180 was probably wide open,while the 200 was stopped down a stop or so...
Both lenses have there weaknesses...the ED AI-S has just a hint of CA as you stop down shooting digitally,and is susceptible to flare and ghosts on film and digitally....neither lens likes a bright contrasty background,but the Nikkor handles it better wide open then the Vivitar. _________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|