| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gaeger
Joined: 16 Jan 2010
Posts: 722
Location: Brier, Wash.
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:21 am Post subject: Nikon Nikkor 3.5/35-200mm |
 |
|
gaeger wrote:
This is an odd lens. Its macro setting actually focuses pretty close. At 35mm, I find it really difficult to focus. At 200mm, it is so extended that light pressure on the barrel can cause one side of the frame or the other to be slightly out of focus. But it's built fairly well and relatively versatile, and -- my key virtue -- cheap. The last frame is straight out of the camera.
_________________
"Here's to the wonder" -- Alan Boyle
Nikkor/Nikon 20, 24, 28, 35, 50, 55, 85, 105, 135, 180, 200, 300, 10-20, 18-35, 18-55, 28-50, 28-70, 24-85, 35-200, 50-300, 75-150, 80-200, 70-210, 70-300, 200-500
Minolta Rokkor 24, 28, 35, 45, 50, 58, 100, 135, 50-135, 300
My most interesting images | Full photostream
Last edited by gaeger on Sun Dec 29, 2013 5:41 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 1973
Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yinyangbt wrote:
Wow !
Beautiful images !
_________________
Cheers , Teo
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=5778915 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Results look really good.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009
Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
i love the stones and water pic...
Tomas |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I love all of them ! congrats!
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 3168
Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Great sharpness and compositions! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NikonD
Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 1922
Location: Slovenija
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NikonD wrote:
great lens, great samples! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gaeger
Joined: 16 Jan 2010
Posts: 722
Location: Brier, Wash.
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
gaeger wrote:
One more shot with the 35-200mm. In July, we were getting amazing sunsets in Seattle caused by the wildfires in Siberia sending smoke all the way across the Pacific. I shot this at Gasworks Park in Seattle. I didn't really notice all the little "stories" going on in the frame until I got home and started looking. This ran on the cover of msnbc.com just before it was renamed to NBCNews.com.
_________________
"Here's to the wonder" -- Alan Boyle
Nikkor/Nikon 20, 24, 28, 35, 50, 55, 85, 105, 135, 180, 200, 300, 10-20, 18-35, 18-55, 28-50, 28-70, 24-85, 35-200, 50-300, 75-150, 80-200, 70-210, 70-300, 200-500
Minolta Rokkor 24, 28, 35, 45, 50, 58, 100, 135, 50-135, 300
My most interesting images | Full photostream
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nisseliten
Joined: 26 May 2012
Posts: 332
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nisseliten wrote:
I love the last one. I think the ones on the left are all standing around talking about AF gear.
_________________
DSLR: Canon 550D, Panasonic DMC-GF3
SLR: Leica R3mot electronic, Leica R4s, Leica R4mot electronic. and more.
Medium Format: Many.
Lenses
Leica: 19/2.8, 35/2, 35/2.8x2, 50/2, 60/2.8 macro, 90/2, 90/2.8, 180/3.4, 250/4, 500/8 T-Noflexar 400/5.6
Other: When will it end?!
Canon: 50/1.8, 70-200 f4 IS
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gaeger
Joined: 16 Jan 2010
Posts: 722
Location: Brier, Wash.
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2024 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gaeger wrote:
Over the years, I've taken as many photos with the 35-200mm Nikkor as with any other manual focus lens. It's just wonderful. I have three copies of it now -- one is pretty beat up, and I use that if I think the conditions might be harsh. I know some folks have had a different experience with it, which I think goes to show how important finding a good copy of any lens is.
_________________
"Here's to the wonder" -- Alan Boyle
Nikkor/Nikon 20, 24, 28, 35, 50, 55, 85, 105, 135, 180, 200, 300, 10-20, 18-35, 18-55, 28-50, 28-70, 24-85, 35-200, 50-300, 75-150, 80-200, 70-210, 70-300, 200-500
Minolta Rokkor 24, 28, 35, 45, 50, 58, 100, 135, 50-135, 300
My most interesting images | Full photostream
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
55
Joined: 13 May 2013
Posts: 717
Location: U.S.
Expire: 2022-06-15
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
55 wrote:
| gaeger wrote: |
| Over the years, I've taken as many photos with the 35-200mm Nikkor as with any other manual focus lens. It's just wonderful. I have three copies of it now . . . |
Bravo! You're putting those lenses to good use, gaeger.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 4015
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Some years ago I got a sample of the Nikkor AiS 3.5-4.5/35-200mm in a box full of defective zoom lenses. Its fromt lens was slightly scratched, but more important its focuising was stuck at infinity (or near infinity). Since I couldn't find any repair information, and since the lens is a complicated one for sure (17 lenses, 13 elements, four groups plus a separate focusing mechanism for close-up) I put it on a shelf.
The AiS Nikkor 35-200mm was part of series of similarly styled AiS zooms - starting with the 3.5/28-50mm, and continuing with the ubiquituous 3.5-4.5/35-105mm and the rarer 3.5-4.5/35-135mm. The 35-135 and the 35-200 were disclosed in the same US patent 4770511, and there we can some pretty interesting information. Unlike the 35-135, the expensive 35-200mm did contain ED and LD glass (v=82 and v=70) as well as three lenses made from two very special glasses with an extremely high refractive index of nD=1.90 (v=35.7) and nD=1.86 (v=23), respectively. In addition there were five more lenses made from high refractive glass (nD=1. . Its pretty clear that the Nikon engineers tried hard to create an outstanding lens.
Today I finally decided to repair my AiS 3.5-4.5/35-200mm (details will follow later). Some quick testing gave some pretty mediocre results, but they are in line with photos published here and - more importantly - on the official Nikon site:
https://imaging.nikon.com/imaging/information/story/0047/
If you read the above story carefully, you'll notice that Haruo sato doesn't really praise the performance of the 35-200, but rather emphasizes the difficulties of designing such a lens around 1980.
More information, a test and sample images will follow.
S
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020
Posts: 1197
Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2024 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
| gaeger wrote: |
| how important finding a good copy of any lens is. |
I couldn't agree with this more, especially when it comes to nikkor zooms.
For a lot of years, I was convinced that the 80-200 f4.5 N was the last successful nikon zoom, especially after some poor experiences with the A/i 80-200 f4.
Enter a a mint pair of often maligned nikon zooms: the 28-85mm f3.5-4.5, and the 35-105 f3.5-4.5 that Stephan mentions.
I was surprised by both of these lenses, especially with their mid f/l performances. The 28-85 is no slouch at the wide end either.
While I came into both lens experiences with low expectations, they are still far from perfect. Where they do work well often shows some very good results.
I still stay away from extreme focal length range zooms, unless they are dirt cheap- still less than usable results for me...
-D.S.
_________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ultrapix
Joined: 06 Jan 2012
Posts: 569
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2024 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ultrapix wrote:
| gaeger wrote: |
Over the years, I've taken as many photos with the 35-200mm Nikkor as with any other manual focus lens. It's just wonderful. I have three copies of it now -- one is pretty beat up, and I use that if I think the conditions might be harsh. I know some folks have had a different experience with it, which I think goes to show how important finding a good copy of any lens is.
|
Looking for information about that lens, I ran through your Flickr, and it's been once again the proof that the photographer is way more important than the lens  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
