View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
carlosriaga
Joined: 07 Dec 2023 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 1:18 pm Post subject: Super Cheap telephoto lens for Nilon D5300 |
|
|
carlosriaga wrote:
Hi, I've just bought a Nikon D5300 for bird photography, I would like to get a cheap telephoto lens, $100 is my budget, 400mm if possible. I don't mind manual focus. Any word of advise will be appreciated. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7577 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
If you want a portable lens, you may consider the sigma. It is possible to find one around $100 if youre patient enough.
http://forum.mflenses.com/sigma-400mm-f56-mirror-t81280.html _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marcusBMG
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1318 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
Hi Carlos
This is a perrrenial question and there are numerous threads here and on forums like Pentax Forums. Definitely read around and check reviews to get a perspective of what's available and how much bang you can get for your bucks.
I've amused myself trying many vintage lenses on my pentaxes. The bottom line is the simple one that mostly you get what you pay for. Modern lenses are better than the vintage ones, but you pay a lot for incremental increases in iq. Note that nikon is not very adaptable in terms of lens mounts: you can get a cheap adapter to go M42 (the most common vintage mount) to nikon but you then lose infinity focus. With a telephoto that might not particularly restrict you, you would still be able to focus to 50-100m which would cover most birding photo distances. But mostly you can't adapt TO nikon, the lens has to come with a nikon mount, or be one of the swappable mount systems (t-mount, adaptall, T4/TX mount). You also need to check how your nikon operates with non-nikon lenses, cheaper models particularly are quite limited in operation.
The cheapest options are indeed the vintage MF lenses. You can certainly get decent pics from eg tokina made 400mm f6.3's (Tokina RMC, vivitar, soligor etc), bide your time and peruse the listings and you should get one for less than 50 bucks. Note I don't recomend the generic "anybrand" 400mm f6.3's - older ones too prone to haze, all too variable in iq. A favourite of mine is the tamron 400mm f6.9, particularly in its cute "nestar" incarnation. I would strongly recommend the sigma apo 400mm f5.6 version 2 (1988> ) if it didn't invariably suffer from haze/speckling of an internal doublet. You can do ok with it if its only slightly affected. The MC sigma 400mm can be quite readily acquired in both AF and non AF forms but I find this a frustrating lens and am reluctant to recommend it.
You can consider mirror lenses, my invariable recomendation on those is the tamron SP adaptall (swappable mount) 500mm f8, either version, with a nikon mount. But mirrors are so ticklish to use. Does your nikon have live view to nail the focus? if it doesn't I would skip the mirrors.
There are more choices at 300mm eg tair 300A 300mm f4.5. tamron adaptall 300mm f5.6 (tamron adaptall 300mm f2.8 if you are prepared to consider upping your buget to more like 500)..
The other thing to say is that if I had your nikon I would diligently browse the listings to see if I could pick up something like an old model sigma for a bargain price (150-300 depending lens, condition etc) eg the 135-400mm apo, 120-400mm apo (there's one of these listed here in UK starting £120, slight fungus, item 176071047505 ), 150-500mm apo; 400mm f5.6 version 3 (1995 > ). Canon dslr owners have the problem that sigmas from the 1990's usually have a microchip incompatibility, nikons don't have this issue. TBH you are going to do better with any of these than most of the vintage MF lenses. But on the other hand you won't get any of those for 50 bucks and getting one of those vintage lenses and learning to use it is both beneficial and rewarding. _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1209 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
With the APSC/DX sensor of the D-5300, manual focus 400mm is going to be a handful and a half.
It can be done, depending on shooting methods. With 400 on the small sensor, the apparent focal length will be about 600mm. Getting that long is going to require a tripod, which can be a bit on the cumbersome side depending on your birding methods.
I would try at first with something a bit shorter like the 200mm nikkor A/I f 4. You should be able to find a clean copy for well under 100.00, and at least get a feel for the format's abilities.
If you want to do something really cheap, the Tamron 103-A 70-210 zoom can be had for around 40.00 or so. The 210mm setting will push your hand held limits a bit with the small sensor. Both lenses are worth keeping, especially if you move up to a full frame sensor.
Personally, for birding, you may have a much higher success rate with a stabilized a/f lens on that sensor size.
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11044 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Welcome carlosriaga! Nice to see you here!
Finding myself in a similar situation albeit many years ago I went for one of the inexpensive (in your price range) "girl watcher" lenses which are made and branded by many manufacturers. Click here to see on Ebay
They are comparatively lightweight. The length makes it easy to swing around. The comparative low cost lets you try it to make your own decisions about whether to invest in a faster lens. And best of all the image quality is pretty good!
_________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
Last edited by visualopsins on Fri Dec 15, 2023 6:46 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4049 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Dec 09, 2023 8:53 pm Post subject: Re: Super Cheap telephoto lens for Nilon D5300 |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
carlosriaga wrote: |
Hi, I've just bought a Nikon D5300 for bird photography, I would like to get a cheap telephoto lens, $100 is my budget, 400mm if possible. I don't mind manual focus. Any word of advise will be appreciated. |
24 MP on the (small) APS-C sensor are pretty demanding for normal lenses, let alone a 400mm tele lens.
Cheap 400mm lenses are not fast, usually f6.3 or f8. You'll have to shoot wide open, and they will have limited resolution and fringing (purple color cast on fine structures).
I've been working with a few vintage 400mm lenses, among them
1) various cheap 400mm f6.3 and f8 long lenses
2) the Canon FD 4.5/400mm and the Canon nFD (EF) 2.8/400mm L (both are IF lenses)
3) the Canon EF 5.6/400mm L
3) the Konica AR 4.5/400mm
4) the Minolta MC 4.5/400mm APO
5) the Minolta AF 4.5/400mm APO G and the Minolta AF 100-400mm G
6) the Sony AL 4.5-5.6/70-400mm G SSM
7) the Novoflex Noflexar-T 5.6/400mm (last version)
Most of these lenses would have some weaknesses on 24 MP APS-C, and most are far outside your budget.
My recommandation would be the Novoflex, preferably in its last version. Be sure to get the triplet ("Noflexar-T"). Sometimes it's cheaper to get the actual lens and the focusing mechanism separately. That's actually how I got mine: Noflexar-T lens for CHF (USD/EUR) 1.--, and focusing mechanism for another CHF 1.--. Totally CHF (USD/EUR) 2.-- for the working combination! More common prices are around 150-200.-- (e-bay), but you can get it cheaper elsewhere. AND you can exchange the lens mount which is GREAT!
The Noflexar T 5.6/400mm has excellent color correction (better than even the Canon nFD 2.8/400mm L !!), but it has some pretty strong field curvature: Focusing on the image center will result in unsharp corners, and focusing to the corners will result in unsharb image center. This is annoying for landscapes, but its no problem at all for animals/birds/portraits/flower. Manual focusing is much faster than with ordinary 400mm MF lenses, and - with some exercise - as fast as with many 400mm AF lenses. You see: this lens specifically was designed for animals and birds.
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gaeger
Joined: 16 Jan 2010 Posts: 722 Location: Brier, Wash.
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
gaeger wrote:
If you want the best possible telephoto lens for a D5300 at $100, you can't beat the Nikkor 70-300mm AF-P DX lens. It comes in VR or non-VR -- I have both, and they both continue to amaze me with the image quality for their size. At the long end, they give you the equivalent of 450mm on a full-frame body. Here are samples of what that lens can do: https://www.flickr.com/search/?user_id=95903184%40N00&sort=date-taken-desc&view_all=1&text=d5200%2070-300mm
But of course, they're not manual focus lenses!
But the great thing is that the D5300 can take any F-mount lens, even non-AI lenses that would break full-frame bodies. So you could get, for instance, a Soligor 400mm f6.3 These images are on a D300 with that lens. (Note that there are a couple of non-400mm mixed in there.)
https://www.flickr.com/search/?user_id=95903184%40N00&sort=date-taken-desc&view_all=1&text=400mm%20soligor
Or a Vivitar 400mm f5.6. These are also with a D300, so much lower resolution. Note the 100 percent crop from the first image.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gaeger2/4320438937/in/photolist-7zMnYv-7zR8UW-9xUunD-a1248i-auRpas-auRpeQ/
As others have noted, rock solid support for those long lenses with a DX body is needed, so you'll need to factor in a tripod or monopod into the equation. (Most of the 400mm images in those links were taken on a monopod.) _________________ "Here's to the wonder" -- Alan Boyle
Nikkor/Nikon 20, 24, 28, 35, 50, 55, 85, 105, 135, 180, 200, 300, 10-20, 18-35, 18-55, 28-50, 28-70, 24-85, 35-200, 50-300, 75-150, 80-200, 70-210, 70-300, 200-500
Minolta Rokkor 24, 28, 35, 45, 50, 58, 100, 135, 50-135, 300
My most interesting images | Full photostream
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1209 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2023 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
That vivitar seems to have worked well on the D-300.
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kathala
Joined: 13 May 2022 Posts: 142
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2023 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
kathala wrote:
I second that. Everything else is either too expensive, won't fit, or is optically terrible. _________________ Photography Reference Tables:
drive.google.com/drive/folders/1aJ5F8XM6t5AK4bydthcDoiwhsh5CUx3N
My Art and Books: ChristianSchnalzger.de
My Exploration of Panoramic Photographic Storytelling:
flickr.com/photos/hach_und_ueberhaupt/
The better you look, the more you see (B. E. Ellis) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marcusBMG
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1318 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2023 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
The sigma 400mm mirror isn't very common and is therefore not easy to pick up for a good price. In any case I would repeat that mirrors are difficult to use and technically limited (no aperture, rarely deliver the goods if the light isn't good ie bright sunlight). The tamron 500mm f8's are much more readily available, recently I have been seeing examples sell very cheaply (ebay UK) - it's a buyers market in the current economic climate. Another reason to consider getting one is that you can then look around for a matching 02F eyepiece adapter, which turns the 500mm mirror into a very nice, very compact 25x spotting scope which really is just the job for a bit of bird spotting. But they're not easy to find and likely to cost a £100 ish.
The posts with links to examples of pics with tokina made (soligor vivitar etc) 400-6.3's / 400mm f5.6's are more pertinent to the discussion, shows what can be done. Much more useful IMO. IME the later f5.6 400mm tokinas while being a bit faster don't really have much of an iq advantage - even the later more premium SD - but are more compact and have closer focus. Note that the 37xxxxx serial number 400mm f5.6 vivitars are tokinas, but the 28xxxxx ones are komine and while quite sharp those IME are fringing monsters.
So I repeat these are the type of lenses I would point to as best price/performance at the bargain basement vintage lens level. Then it's all about technique, light etc. My most useful accessory: a bean bag, and I make tripod foot plates to more easily sit the lens on one! And definitely have a remote shutter control with you.
Your nikon has a good spec. Live view, articulated screen, 24MPx gives you lots of cropping room. Note that the more you crop the more you need the best technique (forget hand holding) to nail critical focus (max magnification in live view), eliminate shake and use the best f stop (typically around f9-10). You crop 50% its like you are using a 1200mm focal length (given that apsc is already like using a 600mm)! Good processing, resize and sharpen then gets you the best outcome.
Finally I agree with stevemark's recommendation of the novoflex for it's iq, but you have to decide whether you really want this idiosycratic weighty bazooka with its trigger focus insead of a "normal" lens... _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlosriaga
Joined: 07 Dec 2023 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
carlosriaga wrote:
Hi! thanks for all the interesting answers, I'm reading all the options you guys gave me and trying to reach some conclusions.
I'm a little worried about the light metering issue, I've been told that the Nikon D5300 can´t measure light with manual lenses, I'm not sure how bad it will be for bird photography. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlosriaga
Joined: 07 Dec 2023 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
carlosriaga wrote:
Hi marcusBMG
marcusBMG wrote: |
You can certainly get decent pics from eg tokina made 400mm f6.3's (Tokina RMC, vivitar, soligor etc) |
What do you think about this lens?
https://www.natcam.com/products/nikon-tokina-400mm-f5-6-rmc-ai-manual-focus-telephoto-f-mount-prime-lens/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlosriaga
Joined: 07 Dec 2023 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
carlosriaga wrote:
While looking for the lenses recommended in this thread found this, way over my budget but quite interesting.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/375124988972?ViewItem=&item=375124988972
Will it work on the Nikon d5300? Any thoughts?
It says the seller don't accept returns, too risky? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlosriaga
Joined: 07 Dec 2023 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
carlosriaga wrote:
Hi Calvin, didn't find any of those, in your experience what about focusing one of this lenses, too difficult? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7577 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
carlosriaga wrote: |
Hi Calvin, didn't find any of those, in your experience what about focusing one of this lenses, too difficult? |
Yes. This lens is pretty difficult to find in Nikon F mount. You will need some luck and time to find one. The good thing is you can sell this lens for what you paid or more than you paid if you get a good copy at around $100.
I have no problem on focusing these mirror lens with live-view. You will need some practice to do so. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7577 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
You will need on with Nikon F mount https://www.ebay.com/itm/155937979609 . However, the lens may not be compatible to your camera as it is quiet old. Even the camera can recognize this lens, the AF will not work on your D5300 as this lens require a focus motor on the camera side(D5300 does not have a build-in focus motor). _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlosriaga
Joined: 07 Dec 2023 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2023 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
carlosriaga wrote:
Doc Sharptail wrote: |
Personally, for birding, you may have a much higher success rate with a stabilized a/f lens on that sensor size.
-D.S. |
Hi Doc Sharptail, what cheap lens will you recommend with those characteristics ?
Carlos |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlosriaga
Joined: 07 Dec 2023 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2023 1:26 am Post subject: Re: Super Cheap telephoto lens for Nilon D5300 |
|
|
carlosriaga wrote:
stevemark wrote: |
My recommandation would be the Novoflex, preferably in its last version. |
Hello Stevemark, that lens looks very well, but I live in Colombia and walking around with a riffle looking lens might be a little dangerous.
Carlos |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlosriaga
Joined: 07 Dec 2023 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2023 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
carlosriaga wrote:
gaeger wrote: |
If you want the best possible telephoto lens for a D5300 at $100, you can't beat the Nikkor 70-300mm AF-P DX lens. It comes in VR or non-VR -- I have both, and they both continue to amaze me with the image quality for their size. At the long end, they give you the equivalent of 450mm on a full-frame body. Here are samples of what that lens can do: https://www.flickr.com/search/?user_id=95903184%40N00&sort=date-taken-desc&view_all=1&text=d5200%2070-300mm
But of course, they're not manual focus lenses!
But the great thing is that the D5300 can take any F-mount lens, even non-AI lenses that would break full-frame bodies. So you could get, for instance, a Soligor 400mm f6.3 These images are on a D300 with that lens. (Note that there are a couple of non-400mm mixed in there.)
https://www.flickr.com/search/?user_id=95903184%40N00&sort=date-taken-desc&view_all=1&text=400mm%20soligor
Or a Vivitar 400mm f5.6. These are also with a D300, so much lower resolution. Note the 100 percent crop from the first image.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gaeger2/4320438937/in/photolist-7zMnYv-7zR8UW-9xUunD-a1248i-auRpas-auRpeQ/
As others have noted, rock solid support for those long lenses with a DX body is needed, so you'll need to factor in a tripod or monopod into the equation. (Most of the 400mm images in those links were taken on a monopod.) |
Hi Geager, I've found this lens
https://www.mpb.com/en-us/product/nikon-af-p-dx-nikkor-70-300mm-f-4-5-6-3g-ed/sku-2284890
wgat do you think? too heavily use? It looks like a good price to me, but maybe 300mm is too short for me, look up some teleconverters and they're expensive
What do you think of this particular lens?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/235033919550?hash=item36b91d003e:g:8QsAAOSwUd1kaf4u&amdata=enc%3AAQAIAAAA4J5jmH%2FnYlMPwrMzBEXf1MTINQzXsZP2zBvbRb4j%2FZV0XaMdygzxDuxzmpK1hFnuOfK9KPmyTuYjNsICjyp1bnuQMi9z3iCBgTBIupimgjYzJljoAY%2FGJE6bSGUGY%2FYsYbEqcIMPlurRNypFkMLA%2FMVZWfj9dtjRHThSH0QjS70qCujReNEo6PnQSoJPpjQyk7OEP4h0cfDMDZKyAo3avDBlYCm7JiU1UbUy0Z%2B1xVfdOpO9hhSgfaVUCrmD03KP6hc9TymxCfwkkwoyBHS487AWMZlpmVHiOSKFLsBBKwRM%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR5yjvPyPYw
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1209 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Tue Dec 19, 2023 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
carlosriaga wrote: |
Hi Doc Sharptail, what cheap lens will you recommend with those characteristics ?
Carlos |
In order to be fair, I moved from the APSC/DX format, and no longer use it.
I still have yet to use an A/F lens myself.
The DX Nikkor in your post above would be worth trying out, just based on price alone.
It may be worth your time to visit a camera store and get a demonstrator lens or two into your hands that will show you how various focal lengths are going to work with your particular camera.
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carlosriaga
Joined: 07 Dec 2023 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2023 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
carlosriaga wrote:
I want to make a resume of the options that you all kindly gave me and some thoughts in front:
*Sigma 400mm mirror lens --> Hard to find
*Tokina/Vivitar/Spiratone ... 400mm --> Several options available
*Sigma APO --> Expensive
*Lenses with 200-300mm --> too short in my limited experience
*Novoflexar --> not safe in Colombia
* Nikon ED AF Nikkor 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 G --> Found one for 100, short reach.
The above resume leaves me with 2 options:
any of Tokina/Vivitar/Spiratone ... 400mm
or Nikon ED AF Nikkor 70-300mm
I'll go with the later with a teleconverter but i've read that it's not a good idea. So the Tokina/Vivitar/Spiratone ... 400mm will be the winner.
I like this one:
https://www.natcam.com/products/nikon-tokina-400mm-f5-6-rmc-ai-manual-focus-telephoto-f-mount-prime-lens/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marcusBMG
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1318 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2023 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
Quote: |
novoflex not safe in Columbia |
Thats a very reasonable price from a shop/reseller - more typically 60-70. In Columbia you don't have as many options as we do in UK/USA/EU etc
Now make a bean bag. _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 420
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2023 11:37 am Post subject: Re: Super Cheap telephoto lens for Nilon D5300 |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
carlosriaga wrote: |
Hi, I've just bought a Nikon D5300 for bird photography, I would like to get a cheap telephoto lens, $100 is my budget, 400mm if possible. I don't mind manual focus. Any word of advise will be appreciated. |
what birds, how big they are .. robin's & finches?
woods or open space? walking or sitting and waiting..?
Having a manual tele lens for birding without auto-focus and even ibis - it's a hard work to get anything in picture, not to mention sharp. Even for a birdy-photo-pro.
Easy way would be with a stady feeder situation |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2023 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
For Birding I would look into m43. Best reach for weight ratio because of the crop sensor and smaller sensors can shoot faster bursts. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7577 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2023 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
D1N0 wrote: |
For Birding I would look into m43. Best reach for weight ratio because of the crop sensor and smaller sensors can shoot faster bursts. |
Yes. Cheap m4/3 body with a 70-300 will do the job. The drawbacks are they only works well with sufficient light and tracking is nearly non-exist on old models. I think both drawbacks are not relevant to the OP. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|