View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:10 pm Post subject: Minolta Rokkor PG 50mm f/1.4 |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
What a great lens. I still haven't been able to convert the mount, and may never, but at least now I'm getting to use the lens. I had one of the optical adapters that I really don't like using. It's not bad, but it definitely degrades the lens, so I've concluded that it doesn't make sense for me. I removed the glass from the adapter and it now serves as an extension tube of sorts. The working distance is now quite short with the focus range being approximately seven to nine inches from the front of the lens - and that's only an estimate.
I've had this Rokkor for 36 years (jeesh, that makes me sound old) and always liked the results, but in the film days it was hard to fully evaluate a lens. Now using this Rokkor in near macro mode it has surprised me with not only its sharpness, but colors and "dynamic range". I don't think a lens is really capable of giving dynamic range, but for whatever reason, I have found that this lens isn't washing out the highs like in my other close focus attempts and I'm getting more detail in dark areas as well.
Here's a 33% crop picture of an orchard spider that I've been photographing all summer:
The same spider at f/2.8:
Dragonfly mild crop:
Whatever they are at f/1.4:
Another bad boy (sorry, I had underexposed):
And a small flower followed by a 100% crop:
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim
Last edited by woodrim on Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:24 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
motleypixel
Joined: 12 May 2010 Posts: 135 Location: Austin, TX USA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
motleypixel wrote:
Curious what body did you use? I just converted an MD Rokkor-X 50/1.4...very nice lens. _________________ -Roy
T h e M o t l e y P i x e l |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I use a SONY A200. I would need to trim 1mm from the registration. If using an M42 adapter, I need to trim nearly 2mm to compensate for the <1mm adapter. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
This is what the mount looks like...
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
motleypixel
Joined: 12 May 2010 Posts: 135 Location: Austin, TX USA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
motleypixel wrote:
Yep, that's the MC (pre MD) still a great lens, but it's possible there were some improvements to coatings in the MD (last manual focus series) plus the aperture was engineered better in the MD...I like the second gen. MD lenses myself.
Yep, I've got two of these MC 50/1.4's and I'll be using an M39-EOS adapter and doing this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/andddre/sets/72157623018600542/with/4113551278/ _________________ -Roy
T h e M o t l e y P i x e l |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dnas
Joined: 14 Nov 2008 Posts: 488 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
dnas wrote:
I have numerous Minolta MC & MD lenses, and most of the primes are very good.
Some of them are exceptional:
Minolta MD Rokkor 85mm F2 (probably my very best Minolta lens)
Minolta MC Rokkor 58mm F1.4 (I have a few of these, and 2 are very good and one is exceptional!!) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vulko
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
vulko wrote:
Are those lenses easy adaptable for sony alpha mount? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fatdeeman
Joined: 13 Jun 2009 Posts: 780 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
fatdeeman wrote:
I love the second picture, you can't see the web! _________________ - Dave
www.lensporn.net
www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/
DSLR: Canon EOS 60D, Samsung GX-1S (Pentax *ist DS2)
Mirrorless: Panasonic DMC-G1, Sony NEX-5N
Compact: Canon PowerShot G3
Lenses:
Wide: Tokina RMC 28mm F/2.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 28mm F/2.5, Sun Optical 28mm F/2.5, Super paragon 28mm F/2.8, Sigma filtermatic 24mm F/2.8, Fujinon 35mm F/2.8, Sun Optical 35mm F/2.8
Standard: Industar 50-2, Helios 44-2, Helios 44M, Helios 44M-3, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.4, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.7, Pentax-M 50mm F/2, Ricoh 50mm F/1.7, Chinon 50mm F/1.7
Tele: Pentacon 135mm F/2.8, Pentacon 200mm F/3.5, Optomax 200mm f/3.5, Sun Optical 135mm F/3.5, Soligor 350mm F/5.6
Zoom: Tokina 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 SZ-X270 SD, Sigma Zoom Pi 35-200mm F4-5.6, Sun Optical 28-80mm F/3.5-4.5, Sunagor 80-205mm F/3.8, Tokina RMC 80-200mm F/4, Vivitar 70-150mm F/3.8, Tamron 95-205mm F/6.3, Tamron Adaptall 28-200mm F/3.8-5.6 LD Aspherical, Tokina RMC 70-210mm F/3.5
Mirror: Falcon (Samyang) 800mm F/8, MTO-11CA 1000mm F/10, Tamron Adaptall 2 500mm F/8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
vulko wrote: |
Are those lenses easy adaptable for sony alpha mount? |
If they were, I'd have done it already. Motleypixel provided a link to an excellent tutorial on how to convert to Canon. I suppose the same approach can be taken to convert to A-mount, but it looks scary to me as someone that does not have metal working equipment, not to mention all those tiny and hard to see parts. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Reviving another old post with recent pictures now that I have the NEX-5N. This old Rokkor has been with me for 40 years.
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7794 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I've got the MD version, I've tried it on the XD7's and like it a lot, I'm just waiting for a MD adapter to arrive any day now so I can try it on my NEX.
It's the lens I'm looking forward to trying the most, and your pictures just reinforce that. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
I love your spider shots. and the bridge(s).
Lovely colors on scary creature.
I don't think there is any bad 50mm. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 2187 Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
hoanpham wrote: |
I don't think there is any bad 50mm. |
True, but this one is not just not bad: actually it's my favorite 50 in my collection.
The only problem is that I can't mount it properly on my Sony dslr: I have to choose between losing infinity or keeping glass in the adapter, that makes the lens unusable wide open.
Really nice shots, btw. _________________ C&C and editing of my pics are always welcome
Samples from my lenses
My gear
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
I see the challenge of adaptors.
Cases of wide open at infinity shot are rare then.
Personally, I rather lose infinity than use a glass adapter.
I recall that 58/1.4 had less good review/opinion and turn out to be good after my tastes.
Except for older lenses, some with swirly and/or harsh bokeh in certain distances, all 50-58 i tested are good. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Thanks for comments. I will be using this lens more now that I can use it in normal ways. The earlier pictures were the close-ups when I was limited by adapter on Sony A200 DSLR. I originally tried the adapter with corrective glass and didn't like the results, so I removed the glass and used it as a straight adapter for close-ups. I've just gone back and edited my earlier pictures to defeat hosting compression and provide a better image.
I also have the MC Rokkor-X PF 50/1.7 and several others at the focal length. I'm curious myself in making some comparisons. Possible candidates include:
58/1.8 Topcor
58/2 Helios
55/1.4 Mamiya Sekor
50/1.4 Hexanon _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ZoneV
Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 1632 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
hoanpham wrote: |
I see the challenge of adaptors... |
Challenges need to be solved
Cause I got some Minolta lenses I want to use on EOS I thought an experimented regarding adapting Minolta lenses to Canon
, and made an adapter. The lens need to be infinity adjusted, and the iris lever must be removed (this could be reversible or with force). But it can still be used on the Minolta cameras - only without all the iris automation. _________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Possible candidates include:
58/1.8 Topcor
58/2 Helios
55/1.4 Mamiya Sekor
50/1.4 Hexanon |
The Mamiya 55/1.4 is very good. I dont have the 3 other. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
ZoneV wrote: |
Challenges need to be solved |
I am not yet at your level of modification, may be one day |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
A few more from the Rokkor...
1
2
3
4
5
6
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Clearly a very fine lens. Thanks for all of the samples
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
I like all images from the last series. Beautiful.
Very nice output from sony.
I have this lens too, but never try it out.
Would you mind to note f-stop? Never mind if that's difficult. I try out my copy soon. Thanks- _________________ La migliore cura di LBA � imparare una nuova lingua. Le meilleur rem�de de LBA est d'apprendre une nouvelle langue. La mejor cura del LBA es aprender una nueva lengua. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
hoanpham wrote: |
I like all images from the last series. Beautiful.
Very nice output from sony.
I have this lens too, but never try it out.
Would you mind to note f-stop? Never mind if that's difficult. I try out my copy soon. Thanks- |
I was shooting in the f/6.3 to f/8 range with the last one at maybe f/2.8-ish. In this environment it is sometimes difficult to shoot for shallow depth of field as the sun is very bright and my camera is limited by ISO100 and 1/4000. Sometimes I have to stop down until I get to below 1/4000. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7794 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I gpt the NEX - MD adapter the other day and the first priority was to try this lens, and what a lens !!!
I'm a bit busy, but I won't fprget this thread, I will post pictures. This is a stunning lens. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Well I'm impressed. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Larnus
Joined: 19 Jul 2012 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Larnus wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
I was shooting in the f/6.3 to f/8 range with the last one at maybe f/2.8-ish. In this environment it is sometimes difficult to shoot for shallow depth of field as the sun is very bright and my camera is limited by ISO100 and 1/4000. Sometimes I have to stop down until I get to below 1/4000. |
Have you tried using an nd filter or polarizer (poor man's nd - gives 2-3 stops less light!)?
You can maintain shallow depth of field even in bright sunshine. polarizer can work nicely on dreamy waterfalls too.
You might get slight loss of iq - really subjective I think.
regarding alpha mods - Jim Buchanan specializes in Minolta lens conversions - maybe worth a shout for info even tho he mainly deals with leica/eos www.jimbuchananspace.com/Camera_Services.html .
Last edited by Larnus on Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:14 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|