View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
asterinex
Joined: 04 Nov 2012 Posts: 311
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 10:09 am Post subject: Canon S 50mm LTM (Leica) which one to get ? |
|
|
asterinex wrote:
Dear members,
I want to buy an old Canon S 50mm mm with Leica Thread Mount.
I have the option to buy following
50/1.8 version Type I, all metal brass 200$
50/1.8 Type II, aka the Black One. 210$
50/1.4 Black 290$
All in equal condition. I have read alot good things about the 1.4, but others say that the 1.8 is sharper.
Which one is is the one to get ?
Important for me is quality of bokeh, sharpness,....
Regards,Gert |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7577 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Get the 1.4, you will love it. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
newst
Joined: 21 Oct 2014 Posts: 617 Location: Troy, MI USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
newst wrote:
You can't lose with any of these lenses. All three are optically and mechanically excellent. Good looking too. The 1.8 might be slightly sharper but I never noticed a difference while the 1.4 bokeh was fractionally better than the 1.8. My choices would be:
1. 1.4/50 for the added speed.
2. 1.8/50 II fantastic, small, light, do anything lens.
3. 1.8/50 I optically identical to 1.8/50 II but heavier due to solid chromed brass housing.
If you are interested in a Sonnar design the 1.5 is an excellent choice also. _________________ Steve
Just an armadillo on the shoulder of the information superhighway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I own the type I, a 1.8 Serenar, and it is an amazingly sharp lens. But you know if I had a choice, I'd be leaning more toward the 1.4. I've seen a lot of fantastic photos taken with that lens and I would want to exploit its smoother bokeh. But whichever way you choose to go, you won't regret it. They're all great lenses. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Of those listed, the 50/1.4 would be my choice, and just to add more options to confuse you, the 50/1.2 is also well worth looking at, and can be had for $400. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
asterinex
Joined: 04 Nov 2012 Posts: 311
|
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
asterinex wrote:
thx guys. I just ordered the 1.4 , will post a review in a few weeks with some pics. thx! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|