Posted: Sat Sep 05, 2015 10:33 pm Post subject: Re: Mysterious Takumar |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
fwcetus wrote: |
EDIT: I was just thinking that it was an interesting prop. After all, if it really were a Quartz Takumar 85/3.5, it's a prop whose exoticism was probably wasted on 99+% of the viewers, but, for the cognoscenti, it'd be a clever prop, in that it might indicate that the camera body behind it could take IR and/or UV pix (while the ST 50/1.4 could handle all the regular shots) - another really neat Bond movie "gadget" then. |
Which of course it can, or they'd never have bothered making the lens.
For IR it does need special film, even normal film will record UV. |