Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Samyang 14/2.8
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:05 pm    Post subject: Samyang 14/2.8 Reply with quote

Got this lens in preparation for the Pentax FF.
The price was just too good to pass.


Rise of the new by jenkwang, on Flickr


I impressed by what this cheap lens can do.
Sharp all the way to the corners at f8.



Stripped bare by jenkwang, on Flickr


The downside is the distortion and the bulging front element which needs a big clunky filter solution.


PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is no light without shadow. Wink

However, nice looking pictures. Well done.


PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tb_a wrote:
There is no light without shadow. Wink

However, nice looking pictures. Well done.


Ha..ha.. yeah.. always some tradeoffs somewhere.


PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


Sit and enjoy the view by jenkwang, on Flickr


PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are these photos with corrected distortion?


PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

redguy22 wrote:
Are these photos with corrected distortion?


A good question. I am intersted by this lens but I would like to have a FF distortion correction in LR5. Is there a solution ?


PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/samyang/14mm-f28.htm


PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think Rockwell had a faulty lens for his review (and I'm a fan of Rockwell, not dogging him just because).
For the price, it's a great piece of glass.
Here are some examples, taken with my A7R. All straight out of camera (except converting to b/w)
Full-res versions available on flickr.


Gap by scepticswe, on Flickr


Old oak tree by scepticswe, on Flickr


The Doors by scepticswe, on Flickr


PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 4:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are some LR profiles on the web:

http://darwinsden.com/lens-profile-2/

http://www.svenstork.com/essays/rokinon-14mm-lightroom-lens-profile/


PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks . This lens seems quite good except this complex distortion profile.


PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 10:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Really love the second pic in this thread Smile


PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 1:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

redguy22 wrote:
Are these photos with corrected distortion?


No, they are not corrected.

But distortion is real strong, just that the scene in these cases make it less apparent.


PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the lens profile links and the likes.


PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 1:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very impressive. This lens is definitely on my 'to get' list, and the above photos just further demonstrate why this is.


PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 2:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pinholecam wrote:
Thanks for the lens profile links and the likes.


You re welcome, as you know distorsion is much dependable on the subject, it can be "horrible" to almost non existent, i need to shoot more with mine.


PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 4:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pinholecam wrote:
redguy22 wrote:
Are these photos with corrected distortion?


No, they are not corrected.

But distortion is real strong, just that the scene in these cases make it less apparent.


Hmm that possibly could be it then. The way your photos looked made it look like they were corrected.

From what I 've read about this lens is that there's a terrible cause of poor quality control. Some are super awesome sharp, with less distortion. Some are just plain terrible. But at these prices, no one can really complain.


PostPosted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 10:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

redguy22 wrote:
pinholecam wrote:
redguy22 wrote:
Are these photos with corrected distortion?


No, they are not corrected.

But distortion is real strong, just that the scene in these cases make it less apparent.


Hmm that possibly could be it then. The way your photos looked made it look like they were corrected.

From what I 've read about this lens is that there's a terrible cause of poor quality control. Some are super awesome sharp, with less distortion. Some are just plain terrible. But at these prices, no one can really complain.


Thats my reason for not owning one: I see pictures and think to myself that I really like it, but I've also heard of a lot of unhappy owners so have always held off.


PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 7:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the profiles links again.

It works well.


A sunset for two by jenkwang, on Flickr


Yeah, I've heard the QC is all over the place.
I got mine from a dedicated cityscape/landscape shooter who I know and he was selling it only because he had moved away from Pentax. (This is the K mount one)
So in a way, I knew his copy was a good one.


PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah yes, subject sensitive to distortion (horizon, tree) are well corrected in this picture.