View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pinholecam
Joined: 26 Nov 2012 Posts: 223
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:05 pm Post subject: Samyang 14/2.8 |
|
|
pinholecam wrote:
Got this lens in preparation for the Pentax FF.
The price was just too good to pass.
Rise of the new by jenkwang, on Flickr
I impressed by what this cheap lens can do.
Sharp all the way to the corners at f8.
Stripped bare by jenkwang, on Flickr
The downside is the distortion and the bulging front element which needs a big clunky filter solution. _________________ Flickr - https://flic.kr/s/aHsjYTLu26
APAD - http://bit.ly/1zv8ZMK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
There is no light without shadow.
However, nice looking pictures. Well done. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pinholecam
Joined: 26 Nov 2012 Posts: 223
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pinholecam wrote:
tb_a wrote: |
There is no light without shadow.
However, nice looking pictures. Well done. |
Ha..ha.. yeah.. always some tradeoffs somewhere. _________________ Flickr - https://flic.kr/s/aHsjYTLu26
APAD - http://bit.ly/1zv8ZMK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pinholecam
Joined: 26 Nov 2012 Posts: 223
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pinholecam wrote:
Sit and enjoy the view by jenkwang, on Flickr _________________ Flickr - https://flic.kr/s/aHsjYTLu26
APAD - http://bit.ly/1zv8ZMK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
redguy22
Joined: 23 Feb 2015 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
redguy22 wrote:
Are these photos with corrected distortion? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
memetph
Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 940 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
redguy22 wrote: |
Are these photos with corrected distortion? |
A good question. I am intersted by this lens but I would like to have a FF distortion correction in LR5. Is there a solution ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/samyang/14mm-f28.htm _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sceptic
Joined: 01 Jun 2013 Posts: 255
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sceptic wrote:
I think Rockwell had a faulty lens for his review (and I'm a fan of Rockwell, not dogging him just because).
For the price, it's a great piece of glass.
Here are some examples, taken with my A7R. All straight out of camera (except converting to b/w)
Full-res versions available on flickr.
Gap by scepticswe, on Flickr
Old oak tree by scepticswe, on Flickr
The Doors by scepticswe, on Flickr _________________ Sony A7R and wildly varying flora of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
memetph
Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 940 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
Thanks . This lens seems quite good except this complex distortion profile. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Really love the second pic in this thread _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pinholecam
Joined: 26 Nov 2012 Posts: 223
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pinholecam wrote:
redguy22 wrote: |
Are these photos with corrected distortion? |
No, they are not corrected.
But distortion is real strong, just that the scene in these cases make it less apparent. _________________ Flickr - https://flic.kr/s/aHsjYTLu26
APAD - http://bit.ly/1zv8ZMK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pinholecam
Joined: 26 Nov 2012 Posts: 223
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pinholecam wrote:
Thanks for the lens profile links and the likes. _________________ Flickr - https://flic.kr/s/aHsjYTLu26
APAD - http://bit.ly/1zv8ZMK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Very impressive. This lens is definitely on my 'to get' list, and the above photos just further demonstrate why this is. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
pinholecam wrote: |
Thanks for the lens profile links and the likes. |
You re welcome, as you know distorsion is much dependable on the subject, it can be "horrible" to almost non existent, i need to shoot more with mine. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
redguy22
Joined: 23 Feb 2015 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
redguy22 wrote:
pinholecam wrote: |
redguy22 wrote: |
Are these photos with corrected distortion? |
No, they are not corrected.
But distortion is real strong, just that the scene in these cases make it less apparent. |
Hmm that possibly could be it then. The way your photos looked made it look like they were corrected.
From what I 've read about this lens is that there's a terrible cause of poor quality control. Some are super awesome sharp, with less distortion. Some are just plain terrible. But at these prices, no one can really complain. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StillSanj
Joined: 21 Apr 2015 Posts: 412 Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
StillSanj wrote:
redguy22 wrote: |
pinholecam wrote: |
redguy22 wrote: |
Are these photos with corrected distortion? |
No, they are not corrected.
But distortion is real strong, just that the scene in these cases make it less apparent. |
Hmm that possibly could be it then. The way your photos looked made it look like they were corrected.
From what I 've read about this lens is that there's a terrible cause of poor quality control. Some are super awesome sharp, with less distortion. Some are just plain terrible. But at these prices, no one can really complain. |
Thats my reason for not owning one: I see pictures and think to myself that I really like it, but I've also heard of a lot of unhappy owners so have always held off. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pinholecam
Joined: 26 Nov 2012 Posts: 223
|
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
pinholecam wrote:
Thanks for the profiles links again.
It works well.
A sunset for two by jenkwang, on Flickr
Yeah, I've heard the QC is all over the place.
I got mine from a dedicated cityscape/landscape shooter who I know and he was selling it only because he had moved away from Pentax. (This is the K mount one)
So in a way, I knew his copy was a good one. _________________ Flickr - https://flic.kr/s/aHsjYTLu26
APAD - http://bit.ly/1zv8ZMK |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
Ah yes, subject sensitive to distortion (horizon, tree) are well corrected in this picture. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|