View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 11:51 am Post subject: Jupiter 9 and Jupiter 12 |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
I've finally managed to shoot a roll of Fuji ISO400 colour neg film in my Kiev and get it processed and scanned. Local developing and scanning service isn't brilliant but this is the only way I can get images from my 35/2.8 Kiev fit Jupiter at present. The 35mm Jupiter looks pretty sharp on the negatives and the scans don't really do it justice. The 85mm I can use on my lumix but it seemed like a good idea to try it on film as well. Again, the scans don't properly show what it can do. And to my great surprise and relief the shutter on the Kiev gives correct exposures, although I didn't rely on the built in light meter.
Jupiter 12 at f8
Jupiter 12 at f8
Jupiter 9 at f2
Jupiter 9 at f2.8
_________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 Posts: 960 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
Unfortunately shop scans never really do justice to a lens. But from what I can see it still looks great. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7794 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
Great pictures, I'd be very happy with those results. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JJB
Joined: 02 Oct 2014 Posts: 424 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JJB wrote:
Very nice, especially the second and the last.
I think I read somewhere on the forum that Attila has a friend who manufactures adapters for Kiev mount lenses to NEX if you would like to use them with a digital setup. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2014 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
JJB - thanks for the note about adapter for NEX. I have a Lumix whose throat isn't wide enough to accept the back of the Jupiter - I'm not sure if the Nex is wider. I read somewhere that the new Sony A7 family can take the J-12 but right now I can't afford to buy one.
The quality of the locally done scans is pretty poor - I don't think the scanner has been cleaned in a long while going by the amount of dust spots on the scans. I've retouched some of them on these pics but you can see a couple of huge ones in two of the pictures. _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Does anyone have the specifics of the J-12? Like the register and where it is measured from? I've always wondered how to go about adapting it. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
Nice photos,they look pretty good to me. _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 2187 Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
scsambrook wrote: |
JJB - thanks for the note about adapter for NEX. I have a Lumix whose throat isn't wide enough to accept the back of the Jupiter - I'm not sure if the Nex is wider. I read somewhere that the new Sony A7 family can take the J-12 but right now I can't afford to buy one. |
The problem with an aps-c nex is that the j-12 would stand too close to the sensor and interfere with the shutter, or some other mechanical part just close to the nex's sensor. The only digital cameras on which it can be used, as far as I know, is the sony A7 family. _________________ C&C and editing of my pics are always welcome
Samples from my lenses
My gear
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Aanything: To my knowledge, the A7 uses the same adapters as NEX, so the sensor must be the same distance. Does that imply any mechanicals are also same distance? I don't know. I'm at a loss to understand this whacky lens mount. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
As far as I know, the rear of J-12 interferes with baffle around sensor of APS-C NEXes. Since sensor is larger on A7, the baffle on A7 has a wider throat, and so there is no interference anymore. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
fermy wrote: |
As far as I know, the rear of J-12 interferes with baffle around sensor of APS-C NEXes. Since sensor is larger on A7, the baffle on A7 has a wider throat, and so there is no interference anymore. |
Ah, okay. So how close is back of lens to sensor? _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2014 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
I have no personal experience, that's what I've read on the net. I think Nordentro has both A7 and J-12, so he would know for sure. In any case, J-12 is safe with A7 as you can see here http://forum.mflenses.com/jupiter-vs-canon-vs-nikkor-rf-battle-ii-t64371.html and not usable with APS-C NEXes. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|