View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 4:29 pm Post subject: Using the Helios 44-2 + extension tube/problem |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
I won a very cheap set of M42 extension tubes off ebay and tried the largest
tube yesterday using the above lens. This is a handheld shot, and just
slightly off from looking finely focused. My problem is, if you use a tripod
or other supportive device, the plant/flower still moves, infinitesimally,
even on a windless day. I guess having the camera rigidly placed reduces
the problem of focus at least by half:
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
If you shoot flowers live on plants, they will shake of course, so your only choice is to use fast enough shutter times. For a gentle breeze 1/250 should be enough in most cases. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
Nice shot Bill!
1/30s for macro 1:1 is too long _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Poilu, you beat me to it! Yes, I checked EXIF and 1/30 is way too long. I
will try shutter priority and see what happens. Thanks.
Thanks, Orio!
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
OK, it's official, I'm an idiot! I tried Shutter Priority and set it to 1/200 since
there was hardly any breeze and of 7 shots taken, 5 I could not tell which
was better focused. Before, I would get 1-2 out of 10 shots that might be
keepers. The light is midday, not good, but I am definitely encouraged, and
this is handheld, too:
I'm seeing more detail than I did before, the fine hairs on the buds, stems.
I will wait for better light today for the peaflower.
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bruce
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 842 Location: Boston, Ma USA
Expire: 2014-11-22
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bruce wrote:
My sister tells me that I should use acrylic glass sheet as a windbreak for flowers. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Arrr, another story book illustrations ! How excellent captures! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Bruce wrote: |
My sister tells me that I should use acrylic glass sheet as a windbreak for flowers. |
Smart sister! I've thought of using plexiglass, same idea, but then,
where's the challenge? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Arrr, another story book illustrations ! How excellent captures! |
Attila, just look at the second one, I hope to do a better version on the
first. I hired the ant to pose by the flower for scale, wonder where he
wandered off. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Very nicely done ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
The second shot is much better Bill, beautiful, but did you really use shutter-priority mode with the Helios? I didn't realise the camera can work round not being able to set the aperture. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Thanks, Luis!
Peter, I set the shutter speed at a constant 1/200 or whatever I want and then adjust (by trial and error) for correct aperture. Yes, the improvement
in focus is demonstrable, silly me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
First one is magical to me, second one is a good but busy capture without extra feel. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Attila wrote: |
First one is magical to me, second one is a good but busy capture without extra feel. |
Attila, I rather like it, too, but got a comment on another forum about
"camera shake" which is photography-speak for focus issues. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
I agree with Attila; first is art, second is National Geographic _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
Nice! Still loving those daisies. Hey Bill what are you paying those ants you hired with? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
I like National Geographic. If I ever get a picture good enough for that I am sure I will drop dead from surprise. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
Luis wrote: |
I am sure I will drop dead from surprise |
come on Luis, you make National Geographic with any lens you hold _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Poilu, appreciate your comment.
Andy, they seem to like raw sugar and honey! LOL Yeah, the daisies are
easy to shoot.
Luis, when it comes to National Geographic, I have nothing to worry about!
But have loved the pictures in that pub since the 50's. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
maddog10
Joined: 08 Apr 2008 Posts: 1072 Location: Maryland, USA
Expire: 2015-02-12
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
maddog10 wrote:
You guys are having all the fun now that I am back to work all day! I actually could have been involved in this thread. I knew a faster shutter speed was needed in the first shot, as I have experimented with extension tubes in the past. I also like the second shot Bill! _________________ Michael Hill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
It's not just an issue with the extension tube Bill - the rules hold good for any macro focusing - specialist lens, tube, bellows, reversed lens whatever. What you are seeking ideally is smallest aperture (depth of field) and fastest speed (absence of blurring). Part of the equation is to use a tripod (recommended) to reduce the speed requirement a bit and give more room for the aperture. The first picture has an "atmosphere" to it, which I think is what some find appealing. The second is "cleaner". Personally I like both but prefer the second.
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Mike, thanks for your comments, hope work didn't beat you up!
Patrick, I know, tripod is going to have to be included if I want anything
worthwhile. The problem with Shutter Priority is when you start to lose the
light your DOF gets narrower and narrower to compensate, otherwise it
looks like a dark mess and when you try to beam it up in PS you get this
lovely noise:
Shot today towards dusk, capping off a frustrating afternoon...
I still need to upload a custom profile for the Oly e300, but to expect
Noise Ninja to be the silver bullet may be going too far.
Thanks for insights and comments, Patrick.
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
maddog10
Joined: 08 Apr 2008 Posts: 1072 Location: Maryland, USA
Expire: 2015-02-12
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
maddog10 wrote:
Bill is this photo after applying NN?
I hit it with Neat Image and it came out ok. _________________ Michael Hill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Mike, no noise reduction whatsoever. I tried it in auto mode and it
lobotomized it, so bailed on that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Well, I still like the Helios 44-2 and shortest extension tube for flower pics:
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|