View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
phoeniks
Joined: 18 Jun 2011 Posts: 62 Location: Czech Republic
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:18 am Post subject: Tamron 135mm f2.5 Adaptall 2 |
|
|
phoeniks wrote:
very nice lens! I was very surprised by IQ wide open and great sharpness. Best of all, I got it for free All I bought was adapter for canon EF (I had FD version) Here are some samples.
oh, and yes, those are again with sony nex 5N with speedbooster _________________ HUGE speedbooster fan! http://www.metabones.cz/?lang=en |
|
Back to top |
|
|
parabellumfoto
Joined: 06 Apr 2013 Posts: 413 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
parabellumfoto wrote:
Very nice shots. The last one of the pretty girl in particular. I assume it was a candid shot and if so well timed!
Thanks for sharing. _________________ Minolta MC Rokkor f1.4 50mm
Minolta MD Zoom Macro 35-105mm f3.5-4.5
Nikon Nikkor 50mm F2
Nippon Kogaku Japan Nikkor-S Auto 5cm F2
Nippon Kogaku Japan Nikkor-Q Auto 135mm F2.8
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 35mm F1.8G
http://www.parabellumfoto.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2697 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
Speedbooster eh? Well judging from your shots it doesn't appear to take anything from the lens' IQ, nice shots. _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/
Last edited by SonicScot on Wed May 15, 2013 3:14 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
...and another good 135mm lens....which reminds me of a test done here comparing 135mms (which I can't find) and have always remembered what the tester said and it was something like:- "There are plenty of good 135mm lenses, but very few exceptional ones" _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013 Posts: 711 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
yes great samples _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
Very nice examples! Glad to see you enjoying these nice lenses! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
Really nice presented _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
phoeniks
Joined: 18 Jun 2011 Posts: 62 Location: Czech Republic
|
Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
phoeniks wrote:
parabellumfoto wrote: |
Very nice shots. The last one of the pretty girl in particular. I assume it was a candid shot and if so well timed!
Thanks for sharing. |
Thanks, and yes, it was a candid shot
I've just tried another Tamron (also free ) 70-210mm - results in another post below main reply (http://forum.mflenses.com/tamron-sp-52a-70-210mm-t57897.html). But 135mm is far beter and more pleasent to use! If I have time, I'll add some more samples. _________________ HUGE speedbooster fan! http://www.metabones.cz/?lang=en |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3704 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
All three shots are great. Fine colors indeed. Looking forward for more! _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 1098 Location: Jakarta
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
Great pictures, phoeniks!
Excalibur wrote: |
"There are plenty of good 135mm lenses, but very few exceptional ones" |
The Tamron 135/2.5 is part of the exceptional ones IMHO. Of course, the lens might not be outstandingly sharp across the whole field wide open, and it might also exhibit a bit of chromatic aberrations under certain circumstances. But it displays a very nice mix of qualities rarely seen on a lens at this price point.
First of all, there are not so many affordable 135mm lenses with an aperture of F/2.5 (have you checked the price for a Voigtländer 125/2.5 recently?). Then, image quality is certainly good enough for a portrait when used wide open, with truly great bokeh (see the nice cat portrait above). Stopped down a bit, it is plenty sharp and will deliver superb landscapes with lots of details. Furthermore, the lens is very compact for a fast 135 (length is only 79.5mm) and it focuses right down to 1.2m, which is great for a compact telephoto lens. Lastly, it features a built-in collapsible lens shade (so handy!), a feature too often left aside by lens makers.
Just add some extensions tubes (or a Raynox dcr-250), and you have a great macro lens. And don't forget that, since it's an Adaptall lens, you can use it with almost any camera on earth (you can even enjoy automatic aperture, focus confirmation and image stabilization if you have a Pentax body)!
Cheers!
Abbazz _________________ Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hifisapi
Joined: 25 Sep 2012 Posts: 941 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hifisapi wrote:
Abbazz wrote: |
Great pictures, phoeniks!
Excalibur wrote: |
"There are plenty of good 135mm lenses, but very few exceptional ones" |
The Tamron 135/2.5 is part of the exceptional ones IMHO. Of course, the lens might not be outstandingly sharp across the whole field wide open, and it might also exhibit a bit of chromatic aberrations under certain circumstances. But it displays a very nice mix of qualities rarely seen on a lens at this price point.
First of all, there are not so many affordable 135mm lenses with an aperture of F/2.5 (have you checked the price for a Voigtländer 125/2.5 recently?). Then, image quality is certainly good enough for a portrait when used wide open, with truly great bokeh (see the nice cat portrait above). Stopped down a bit, it is plenty sharp and will deliver superb landscapes with lots of details. Furthermore, the lens is very compact for a fast 135 (length is only 79.5mm) and it focuses right down to 1.2m, which is great for a compact telephoto lens. Lastly, it features a built-in collapsible lens shade (so handy!), a feature too often left aside by lens makers.
Just add some extensions tubes (or a Raynox dcr-250), and you have a great macro lens. And don't forget that, since it's an Adaptall lens, you can use it with almost any camera on earth (you can even enjoy automatic aperture, focus confirmation and image stabilization if you have a Pentax body)!
Cheers!
Abbazz |
yeah, but if your using a Pentax body, it cant compare to the TRULY exceptional 6 element SMC Pentax K 135mm F2.5 which would be comparable but superior in several ways. Its that good. _________________ ===========
ACQUIRED OVER 30 YEARS:
Cameras: DSLR=Pentax istDS FILM=Pentax SP, SP-F, ESII, SP1000, KX, K2
Lenses : Pentax M42 = Super Multi Coated Takumars 50/1.4 55/1.8 100/4-BELLOWS 500/4.5 1000/8 135-600/6.7 Pentax PK= SMC Pentax-Ks K17/4-FF Fisheye K18/3.5 K20/4 K24/3.5 K28/3.5 K28/2 K35/3.5 K35/2 K50/1.2 K50/1.4K 50/4-MACROK 55/1.8 K85/1.8 K100/4-MACRO K100/4-BELLOWS K105/2.8 K120/2.8 K135/3.5 K135/2.5 K150/4 K200/4 K400/5.6 K45-125/4K 85-210/4.5 Pentax PKM = SMC Pentax-M M40/2.8-Pancake M50/1.4 M75-150/4 M80-200/4.5 Pentax PKA= SMC Pentax-A A15/3.5 A50/2.8-MACRO A28/2 A35/2 A50/1.4 A135/2.8 A200/4 A*300/4 A35-105/3.5 A24-50/4 A70-210/4 TAMRON AD2= SP80-200/2.8 SP180/2.5 TOKINA AT-X PK= ATX28-85/3.5-4.5 ATX35-70/2.8 ATX60-120/2.8 ATX80-200/2.8 ATX100-300/4 ATX90/2.5 MACRO KIRON-LESTER DINE PK = 105/2.8-MACRO VIVITAR PK = 135/2.8-MACRO 28-85/4 NOFLEXAR AUTOBELLOWS PK = 60/4 105/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kendo1
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 171 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kendo1 wrote:
I've not seen one for a while. Your results look pretty good.
I think I'll see if there are any going cheap... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7788 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
kendo1 wrote: |
I've not seen one for a while. Your results look pretty good.
I think I'll see if there are any going cheap... |
There might be rush of interest in this Tamron. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Fri May 17, 2013 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Those are excellent images. Is this the Close Focus model? _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
parabellumfoto
Joined: 06 Apr 2013 Posts: 413 Location: Sydney, Australia
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 4:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
parabellumfoto wrote:
phoeniks wrote: |
parabellumfoto wrote: |
Very nice shots. The last one of the pretty girl in particular. I assume it was a candid shot and if so well timed!
Thanks for sharing. |
Thanks, and yes, it was a candid shot
I've just tried another Tamron (also free ) 70-210mm - results in another post below main reply (http://forum.mflenses.com/tamron-sp-52a-70-210mm-t57897.html). But 135mm is far beter and more pleasent to use! If I have time, I'll add some more samples. |
I keep looking at that photo. Amazing shot.
You should enter it into a contest. Absolutely stunning shot. Well timed and in my opinion it's a contest winner! _________________ Minolta MC Rokkor f1.4 50mm
Minolta MD Zoom Macro 35-105mm f3.5-4.5
Nikon Nikkor 50mm F2
Nippon Kogaku Japan Nikkor-S Auto 5cm F2
Nippon Kogaku Japan Nikkor-Q Auto 135mm F2.8
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 35mm F1.8G
http://www.parabellumfoto.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 6:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
****First of all, there are not so many affordable 135mm lenses with an aperture of F/2.5 ***
Well you could be right, but is there that much difference between f2.5 and f2.8 and it's possible the true aperture could be f2.6 _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bruzzo
Joined: 05 Jul 2012 Posts: 153
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
bruzzo wrote:
Excalibur wrote: |
****First of all, there are not so many affordable 135mm lenses with an aperture of F/2.5 ***
Well you could be right, but is there that much difference between f2.5 and f2.8 and it's possible the true aperture could be f2.6 |
I am not too knowledgeable as to recent market prices on lenses. I think the Canon FD 135 2.5 S.C. should be around the same price as this Tamron 135 2.5? And I remember there's a soligor 135 2.5 as well, but guess it would be inferior in sharpness and optical quality to this Tamron hence it would be cheaper.
How about the Vivitar 135/2.3 compared to this Tamron 135/2.5? I think in terms of price the Vivitar should be a bit more expensive than the Tamron on average but there's always outliers...
Anyways superb photos indeed! The speedbooster is releasing the full potential of the lens. I still haven't figure out the 135 (202.5) focal length on an apsc yet, good for flower and animals but is in my mind competing with other focal lengths that are also good such as 85 and 90mm. And it seems too long for portraits most of the time. Mostly close up head shots and if you want upper body you'll need to walk further away. Much to learn indeed . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
phoeniks
Joined: 18 Jun 2011 Posts: 62 Location: Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
phoeniks wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Those are excellent images. Is this the Close Focus model? |
Yes, close focus model _________________ HUGE speedbooster fan! http://www.metabones.cz/?lang=en |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MacTak
Joined: 15 Jun 2011 Posts: 108
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MacTak wrote:
I had one of these Tamron AD2 135/2.5 lenses and also found it to be surprisingly good. It was basically as good as my S-M-C Takumar 135/2.5 (the first version)--I never did any formal head to head tests, but in general shooting they seemed pretty close. The advantage to the Tamron is the close focus (although at close focus, mine needed to be stopped down to f5.6 before becoming good); the advantage to the Takumar was build quality (and SMC). In the end I kept the Takumar but still have quite a soft spot for the Tamron. I did take the Tamron apart to clean, and of note was that the third element was entirely a friction fit, so one good drop could easily alter its spacing or orientation slightly and so degrade IQ (so if you have a bad copy, it's worth checking). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
phoeniks
Joined: 18 Jun 2011 Posts: 62 Location: Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
phoeniks wrote:
more samples, all wide open.
_________________ HUGE speedbooster fan! http://www.metabones.cz/?lang=en |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Excalibur wrote: |
****First of all, there are not so many affordable 135mm lenses with an aperture of F/2.5 ***
Well you could be right, but is there that much difference between f2.5 and f2.8 and it's possible the true aperture could be f2.6 |
+1 _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Inner shoots shows weakness of inexpensive lens like this Tammy, better coating on Carl Zeiss, Leica give much more clarity on inner pictures. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Sat May 18, 2013 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
phoeniks wrote: |
more samples, all wide open.
|
I particularly liked #3(singer) and #4(glass pouring). Excellent results!
PS: #6 is very nice too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun May 19, 2013 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Singer result is very good indeed, I think due nice light on his face. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
phoeniks
Joined: 18 Jun 2011 Posts: 62 Location: Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sun May 19, 2013 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
phoeniks wrote:
100% crop from singer photo (bright sun light ISO100):
pictures from the night are ISO3200, so some noise/noise reduction might have changed them a little. _________________ HUGE speedbooster fan! http://www.metabones.cz/?lang=en |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|