View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 5:53 pm Post subject: Kodak D-76 |
|
|
Attila wrote:
My latest and seems favorite developer. Why ?
1) All film what I did try required same develop time, Agfa APX 100, Fomapan 100, Fortepan 100,Orwo NP 20,Ilford 50 and come out nice with great tone, limited grain. This is big thing to me due I like to try many films and develop them in batch two tanks 6 rolls at same time.
2) Long self life stock dilution keep 2-3 months
3) Inexpensive with 1L stock dilution I did develop 25 rolls already and no sign of end. After each 4 rolls I did extend time with 1 minute.
Some samples
http://forum.mflenses.com/contax-ii-sonnar-5cm-f2-0-pre-war-ilford-pan-f50-kodak-d-76-t55572,highlight,%2Bkodak.html
http://forum.mflenses.com/certo-six-portraits-fomapan-100-kodak-d-76-wide-open-t55539,highlight,%2Bkodak.html
http://forum.mflenses.com/certo-six-second-version-fomapan-100-kodak-d-76-t55382,highlight,%2Bkodak.html
http://forum.mflenses.com/kodak-technical-pan-mamiya-c3-kodak-d-76-t54675,highlight,%2Bkodak.html
http://forum.mflenses.com/ultrix-6x9-ihagee-fortepan-100-kodak-d-76-t54509,highlight,%2Bkodak.html
http://forum.mflenses.com/mamiya-c3-fortepan-100-kodak-d-76-t54614,highlight,%2Bkodak.html _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
marzipan
Joined: 21 Jan 2013 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2013 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marzipan wrote:
D-76 also comes (or at least it used to come) in the shape of D-76R, which is a specially formulated replenisher solution. After each use one adds the prescribed number of milliliters (forgot how much) and can this way keep the same developing soup going (keeping its characteristics) for a LONG time. Was very useful in larger labs with big tanks of D76.
Does anyone know the recipy for the R solution? Metol, hydroquinone, and...?
D76 is also in my experience a perfect developer for most classic films and I have been using it for years. Tri-X, HP5, Neopan, they all turn out very good in it. Well structured medium sized grain and good detail, also on faster films.
T-max 3200 however did NOT work so well the times I tried, good to know for those who still have some left. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jimithing616
Joined: 27 Mar 2013 Posts: 63 Location: Minneapolis, MN
|
Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
jimithing616 wrote:
Yea, I like Rodinal for the T3200
I would probably not develop different films in the same tank regardless of their developing times... the different emulsions may cause improper results... there was a discussion about this over on APUG... People over there with more knowledge than me seemed to have had bad experiences with it... or if not BAD... not as GOOD as when developed alone... Up to you though
D-76 is good stuff though... I would recommend getting good at using it... it will surprise you how great the results can really be... this and rodinal are really awesome stuff... _________________ My Best Lenses (off the top of my head):
Konica UC 28mm 1.8 AR
Konica UC 80-200mm 4 AR x2
Konica 55mm 3.5 Macro w/Converter.
Minolta MD 24mm 2.8
Minolta MC 58mm 1.4
Minolta MD & MC 50 1.4
Vivitar 35mm 1.9 (minolta MD)
Canon FD 50mm 1.4 S.S.C. & FDn
Canon FD 24mm 2.8 S.S.C. & FDn
Canon FD 200mm 4 S.S.C
Canon FD 135 3.5 S.C. & FDn
Tamron Adaptall 2 24mm 2.5
Nikon AI-S 55mm 2.8 Macro
SMC Pentax-m 50mm 1.4
SMC Pentax-m 135 3.5
Spiratone Plura-Coat 28mm f/2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Schnauzer
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 Posts: 2155 Location: Maine, USA
Expire: 2012-03-08
|
Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Schnauzer wrote:
Some of your film was really quite old. It must have been still good to get such nice results. Do you think part of the reason it came out so well was the developer itself or would it have come out as good with a different developer? _________________ Ron |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Schnauzer wrote: |
Some of your film was really quite old. It must have been still good to get such nice results. Do you think part of the reason it came out so well was the developer itself or would it have come out as good with a different developer? |
I think developer, time, temperature is key factor. D-76 (MIcrophen) is best what I did use until now, (Rodinal, Fomadon LQN, LQR) _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
NikonAIS
Joined: 23 Mar 2014 Posts: 227 Location: Pawleys Island, SC, US
|
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
NikonAIS wrote:
I have used D-76 and Microdol-X for the last 40+ years. Microdol 1:3 produces very high acutance and tight grain but the development times are somewhat long and shadow detail is sometimes lacking. D-76 1:1 @ 68 degrees is a good combination with wide EV range and it lends itself very well to N-1, N+1 and N+2 developments. _________________ Nikon FTn, F2A, F3HP, F4E, F5, Nikkormat FT2, Nikon FE-2, Nikonos V, D850, D500 and D750. 8mm f/2.8 AIS, 16mm f/2.8 Fisheye AIS, 15mm f/3.5 AIS, 18mm f/3.5 AIS, 24mm f/2 AIS, 28mm f/2 AIS, 28mm f/3.5 Nikkor H non-AI, 25-50mm f/4 AIS, 28mm f/3.5 and 35mm f/2.8 UW-Nikkors, 35mm f/1.4 AIS, 50mm f/1.4 AIS, 50mm f/1.4 Nikkor-S, 50-135mm f/3.5 AIS, 55mm f/2.8 AIS Micro w/ PK-13, 80-200mm f/4 AIS, 85mm f/1.4 AIS, 105mm f/1.8 AIS, 10.5 cm f/2.5 non-AI, 105mm f/2.8 AIS Micro, 135mm f/2 AIS, 180mm f/2.8 ED AIS, 200mm f/4 Micro AIS and PN-11, 200mm f/2 ED-IF AIS, 300mm f/2.8 ED-IF AIS, 400mm f/2.8 ED-IF AIS, 500mm f/8 Reflex, 600mm f/4 ED-IF AIS, TC14B and TC300.
Hasselblad 500CM with PM-90 eye level finder and assorted A12 and A16 backs, Carl Zeiss C and CF T* 40mm f/4. 60mm f/3.5. 80mm f/2.8, 150mm f/4 and 250mm f/5.6
AF lenses are for sissies! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
moltogordo
Joined: 16 Mar 2014 Posts: 46 Location: Prince George, British Columbia
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2014 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
moltogordo wrote:
You've discovered the charms of a great developer. Ilford ID 11, by the way, is essentially the same thing. D76 has long been a favorite of pictorialists, but I'll throw in with jimithing616 in saying that you should really get to know it - any chemical benefits from the user having experience with it, but I think especially D76.
Being the lazy slob that I am, I went to HC110, diluting straight from the syrup, because it is very similar to D76 and the one shot concept is much easier for my mind to grasp than replenishing. I use HC110 with HP5, exposed at ASA320, 1:64 for 11 minutes at 68. I use Rodinal on a few other films like Tri-X because I like the quality of the negatives.
I seldom use other films (except XP2) going to a larger format negative rather than a different film, but I am a cantankerous old fart set in my ways! And I am still crying over the loss of Plus X, not yet ready to believe it no longer exists and having to use FP4, which is a perfectly good film. _________________ If you prefer "I think, therefore I am" to "non sum qualis eram", you are putting Descartes before Horace. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|