View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1058 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 2:28 pm Post subject: Canon EX-EE QL lenses |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
A Happy New Year to everybody !
On a 5-bottles-of-beer-impulse I've just unexpectedly won on ebay a Canon EX-EE QL and the complete set of 4 lenses for it.
I offered 75$ for the whole set without thinking that the seller will accept, but he did!
This is the set:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/171203725149?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1497.l2649
I don't think I'm ever going to use the camera. The 4 lenses could be interesting but I have no experience with them.
I know that the convertible lenses could be either very good or crappy. Have any of you direct experience with this lenses?
If they are good enough I could extract the lens-base off the camera and adapt it to my Nex. This way I'll have a full set of 4 EX lenses adapted in a not to bulky setup.
Is it worth to do it or is better to resell the whole set?
Last edited by dan_ on Wed Jan 01, 2014 5:25 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
dan_ Hi, I also have the full set(EX not QL) includes all lenses,Hoods for each,original Flash,5filters 48mm,48mm-49mm step up,manual and all in brown leather case.Must have been very lightly used as in ex++ condition,I paid $60 US but have seen on Ebay as much as $300 just for camera and 4lenses nothing else.lenses can be used with bellows. Interesting to see what members think. _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wayup North
Joined: 11 Dec 2013 Posts: 3 Location: 60 degrees north
|
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wayup North wrote:
Hi there,
I don't think these lenses are of any use on their own. As far as i can remember, the lenses only contain half of the optics needed. The rearmost lens group is fixed in the camera, so the detachable part can not produce a picture. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11053 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Wayup North wrote: |
Hi there,
I don't think these lenses are of any use on their own. As far as i can remember, the lenses only contain half of the optics needed. The rearmost lens group is fixed in the camera, so the detachable part can not produce a picture. |
Welcome! _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Wayup North wrote: |
Hi there,
I don't think these lenses are of any use on their own. As far as i can remember, the lenses only contain half of the optics needed. The rearmost lens group is fixed in the camera, so the detachable part can not produce a picture. |
Correct, rear group is permanently affixed to the camera. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1058 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
...rear group is permanently affixed to the camera. |
I know that but the rear group can be taken off the camera and adapted to a digital camera. This way you have all 4 lenses adapted with a single adapter (that includes the rear group).
My question is : are this lenses good enough to merit the effort.
According to this article:
http://photo.net/classic-cameras-forum/00Spje
appears so, but in other articles I've found mixed opinions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 749 Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
Best to send the whole set to some rabid Canonista. Me! _________________ In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1058 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
Still nobody has any experience with this lenses? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
dan_ wrote: |
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
...rear group is permanently affixed to the camera. |
I know that but the rear group can be taken off the camera and adapted to a digital camera. This way you have all 4 lenses adapted with a single adapter (that includes the rear group).
My question is : are this lenses good enough to merit the effort.
According to this article:
http://photo.net/classic-cameras-forum/00Spje
appears so, but in other articles I've found mixed opinions. |
Yes, keep an eye out for a broken camera chap to make an adapter.
Not sure about the quality of the lenses, I would expect them to be good but perhaps a little less good than the contemporary Canon FL lenses due to having to make some compromises in the optical design to allow for the common rear group. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1058 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
The auction I won already includes a camera. Its meter is not working and I don't intend to use it anyway, so I'll use it to make the adapter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Good luck, I'm interested to see your results. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
dan_ Please keep me informed,with pics if possible, of your progress and results re.conversion.Regards _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1058 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
kryss wrote: |
dan_ Please keep me informed,with pics if possible, of your progress and results re.conversion.Regards |
kryss, I've taken off the rear group from the camera. That was simple - just 3 screws are keeping the front Al. masks. Once this masks are off 4 screws are keeping the rear group in place.
After the rear group was taken off I've taped it in front of a focusing helicoid NEX adapter to finally see if the lenses are worth adapting to NEX.
With this set-up only close-up with the diaphragm blocked wide opened was possible. The 4 lenses proved to be nice enough in my opinion - especially 35mm and 50mm.
See the first samples (with some basic PS adjustments):
35 mm.
50 mm.
95 mm
120 mm
The bad news is that the diaphragm included in the back group is controlled from inside the camera. For a proper use of diaphragm the back lens group has to be extracted from the lens-diaphragm-helicoid ensemble and remounted at the back of a new diaphragm.
And that is not easy as lens barrel and the diaphragm housing are a single block of Al.
I've cut it off the Al. block, I have a proper diaphragm and now I am in the stage of making the adapter. Some lathe parts have to be made. When I'll finish it I'll come back with more details. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16662 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
You're really brave Dan, I praise your willingness to cut through all those obstakles! _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1058 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
Thank you Klaus!
If I knew from the beginning that it's so difficult I would probably renounced. Unfortunately I realized that only when the dismantling process was in a point of no-return : either I continue or I had to throw everything to garbage as useless. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ZoneV
Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 1632 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
Looks good!
I thought about such an adapter a while ago, but with my EOS DSLR I saw it as probably not working. So I did not buy such a camera and lenses. Great to see this idea realized! _________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1058 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2014 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|