Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
#3 three for me.
too much fish for me also, even if I'm fisheye addicted aswell.
A gnomic wide angle would have been a little better here. Best fisheye pics are fisheye pics where you almost can't see that a fisheye was used.
Does your camera has DRO? In some of these shots that might have been helpful to get an better exposure. I personally would have exposed for the ground and not for the sky.
Which Samyang fisheye did you use? There are several... for MFT there are at least two (8/3.5 is easily adaptable and 7,5/3.5 a native one).
I used both 8/2.8 and 8/3.5 (adapted) on NEX and I'm loving them both. 8/2.8 is better wide open and is much more compact, 8/3.5 has slightly more harmonic distortion which makes composition easier (imho). _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |