View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 11:28 am Post subject: Portraits |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
First one with a Samyang 84/1.4, all others Helios 40, any C&C welcomed as always.
.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
#4 to me on others too much dark area on face. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Regarding picture #1: wide open portraits are very nice, but you need to make sure that both eyes are on the same focus line (frontal),
because depth of field is shallow at 85mm and it doesn't look good when one eye is super sharp and the other is defocused.
In picture #2 the difference of focus between the eyes is smaller (because of the aperture, but maybe also because the lens is less sharp),
so the image feels better. #3 solves the problem because it's a nearly pure profile so the other eye is invisible.
In general, when taking close-up portraits of face and shoulders only, it's better to stop down to a safety aperture (e.g. f/4 or f/5.6)
and if there is not enough separation from the background, place the subject farther from the background. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rick1779
Joined: 17 May 2013 Posts: 1207 Location: Italy
Expire: 2014-06-06
|
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rick1779 wrote:
I prefer #4 and #5, better light and background |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Regarding picture #1: wide open portraits are very nice, but you need to make sure that both eyes are on the same focus line (frontal),
because depth of field is shallow at 85mm and it doesn't look good when one eye is super sharp and the other is defocused.
In picture #2 the difference of focus between the eyes is smaller (because of the aperture, but maybe also because the lens is less sharp),
so the image feels better. #3 solves the problem because it's a nearly pure profile so the other eye is invisible.
In general, when taking close-up portraits of face and shoulders only, it's better to stop down to a safety aperture (e.g. f/4 or f/5.6)
and if there is not enough separation from the background, place the subject farther from the background. |
+10 _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Regarding picture #1: wide open portraits are very nice, but you need to make sure that both eyes are on the same focus line (frontal),
because depth of field is shallow at 85mm and it doesn't look good when one eye is super sharp and the other is defocused.
In picture #2 the difference of focus between the eyes is smaller (because of the aperture, but maybe also because the lens is less sharp),
so the image feels better. #3 solves the problem because it's a nearly pure profile so the other eye is invisible.
In general, when taking close-up portraits of face and shoulders only, it's better to stop down to a safety aperture (e.g. f/4 or f/5.6)
and if there is not enough separation from the background, place the subject farther from the background. |
Thanx Orio and all others for the comments, as always it very intresting to hear how other see your pictures.
The idea was to "hide" the oof eye in the "chiaroscuro", at least on some, i try to nail the focus on the eye in the brighter part. I am "experimenting" with chiaroscuro and shooting backlit lately, very difficult to do and even harder to post process, difficult to get the balance between the darker parts and the brighter one correctly.
All where taken wide open, i agree that the "softness" of the Helios helps to make the difference between the eyes less evident, then there are also slight differences in PP sharpening. I was trying to stir away from a classic passport head and shoulders portrait, that would have been easyer to do. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|