View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Victor Nguyen
Joined: 02 Aug 2012 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:32 am Post subject: What is your favorite lens to focus on? |
|
|
Victor Nguyen wrote:
I don't know if this is a weird question or not, but do you guys judge how much you like a lens by the focusing? _________________ Nikkor 24mm f2.8 ai, Rokinon/Samyang 35mm f 1.4, Nikkor 55 f2.8 micro ais, Rokinon/Samyang 85mm f 1.4, Pentacon 135 "bokeh monster" f 2.8, Contax Zeiss 180 f 2.8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
twinquartz
Joined: 11 Jun 2012 Posts: 316 Location: Sweden
Expire: 2013-10-29
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
twinquartz wrote:
Yes, I do -- in the sense that I hate wobbly, short focus ring travels.
Examples:
Canon 50mm/1.8 II is horrible.
Industar-61L/Z is superb. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enliten
Joined: 20 Sep 2011 Posts: 201 Location: Perth, WA
Expire: 2014-07-03
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
enliten wrote:
my super takumar 50 1.4 has the smoothest focus ring out of any of my lenses _________________ www.craftedbyben.com
Digital: Canon EOS 7D
Film SLRs: Zenit 122, Nikon F55, Nikon FM2, Pentax Spotmatic, Pentax ME Super, Pentax K1000, Minolta SR1
Rangefinders: Konica Auto S2, Zeiss Ikon Contessa LKE, Zeiss Ikon Continette, Zeiss Ikon Ikonta 521/16, Fed 5B
50's: Super Takumar 50 f1.4, Helios 44-m6,, Minolta MD 50 f1.4, Meyer Optik Oreston 50 f1.8, Olympus 50 f1.4, Industar 55 f2.8 (RF), Jupiter-3 50 f1.5 (RF), Yashinon DS 50 f1.4, Zeiss Jena 50 f2.8, Zeiss Pancolar 50 f1.8
Med Tele: Jupiter-11 135 f4 (RF), Mamiya 120 f4 Macro (645), Meyer Optik Trioplan 100 f2.8, Jupiter-9 85 f2
Tele: Jupiter-21a 200mm f4
Wide: Rikenon 35 2.8, Rikenon 28 f2.8, Minolta MD 28 f2.8, Minolta MD 24 f2.8, Pentacon 30 f3.5, Enna Werk Munchen Lithagon 35 f4.5
Autofocus: Canon 50 1.8, Sigma 50 1.4, Tokina 11-16 2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 2187 Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
All my Taks are a joy to focus: long throw, perfectly damped, great feel.
Also, i really like my Tair 3 Phs for its knob, which i find extremely comfortable and accurate. _________________ C&C and editing of my pics are always welcome
Samples from my lenses
My gear
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
Any lens with long focus throw, but also smooth, even, precise and damped. _________________ La migliore cura di LBA � imparare una nuova lingua. Le meilleur rem�de de LBA est d'apprendre une nouvelle langue. La mejor cura del LBA es aprender una nueva lengua. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
hoanpham wrote: |
Any lens with long focus throw, but also smooth, even, precise and damped. |
+1 _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Victor Nguyen
Joined: 02 Aug 2012 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Victor Nguyen wrote:
Then shouldn't pentacon 135mm be the best? man is the focus throw for that lens long. _________________ Nikkor 24mm f2.8 ai, Rokinon/Samyang 35mm f 1.4, Nikkor 55 f2.8 micro ais, Rokinon/Samyang 85mm f 1.4, Pentacon 135 "bokeh monster" f 2.8, Contax Zeiss 180 f 2.8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2697 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
hoanpham wrote: |
Any lens with long focus throw, but also smooth, even, precise and damped. |
Using that criteria my choice would be my Nikon 105/4 micro. A great example of precise engineering. _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
I have a few lenses that have 360deg focus throws, I find them to be a bit long, I prefer 180-200 deg.
I like my Tak's, and my MC Rokkor's the most, I love the metal focus rings, pure heaven. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scope79
Joined: 05 May 2011 Posts: 2 Location: Liverpool .England
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Scope79 wrote:
nikkor 50mm 1.8 ais and Super tak 50mm 1.4 , are pure focus joy for me !!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I like the Tair-3s knob too. Micro-Nikkor 3.5/55 i really like the focus action of, Topcor RE Autos I have also have beautifully smooth and damped focus.
The worst has to be any AF lens in MF mode. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vlousada
Joined: 11 Dec 2010 Posts: 345 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vlousada wrote:
To me, any Macro manual focus lens is a joy to focus...
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
The worst has to be any AF lens in MF mode. |
+1000 _________________ Regards,
VITOR
-------
SELLING:
Please ask
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Victor Nguyen
Joined: 02 Aug 2012 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Victor Nguyen wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
The worst has to be any AF lens in MF mode. |
Why do you think I start using MF lenses? _________________ Nikkor 24mm f2.8 ai, Rokinon/Samyang 35mm f 1.4, Nikkor 55 f2.8 micro ais, Rokinon/Samyang 85mm f 1.4, Pentacon 135 "bokeh monster" f 2.8, Contax Zeiss 180 f 2.8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
Aanything wrote: |
All my Taks are a joy to focus: long throw, perfectly damped, great feel. |
much agreed, but really I like focusing my Pentax K lenses just as much!
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
The worst has to be any AF lens in MF mode. |
manually focusing my AF Pentax FA43 ltd., which makes a very subtle sound as if well lubricated gear wheels were turning, is wonderful, a pure pleasure! _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Leitz lenses
I generally prefer a short way to focus _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
twinquartz
Joined: 11 Jun 2012 Posts: 316 Location: Sweden
Expire: 2013-10-29
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
twinquartz wrote:
ForenSeil wrote: |
I generally prefer a short way to focus |
But wouldn't that give you less precision? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Drack
Joined: 27 Feb 2011 Posts: 735 Location: Lithuania
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Drack wrote:
I really like lenses that don`t have to be turned several times to jump from minimum focus distance to infinity. I find them to be fast, easy to use.
The Tair-3PSH is one of the most comfortable telelenses that I have used. The knob makes it all worth while _________________ I have many great Russian cameras and lenses for sale on my ebay account, please check it out: http://www.ebay.com/sch/piksius/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_from=&_ipg=25&_trksid=p3686
Forum members are olbigaded to a discount
DSLR: Pentax K-x + 18-55 kit + f4 35-75mm
Mirrorless : Samsung NX-20 + 18-55 kit
M42 lense: Helios 44-2 , Helios 44-3, Helios 44m , Tair 3 Phs , Mir-1B , Jupiter-37a, Industar 50-2, Industar 61 L/Z, Tlear-N .
Currently using:
Minolta X-700 + MD f1.7/50mm + Rokkor-X f2.8/28mm + MD f3.5 35-70mm MACRO
Zorki-4K + J-8 f2/50mm + J-12 f2.8/35mm
EXA 1A + CZJ Tessar f2.8/50mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chris_zeel
Joined: 21 Jan 2013 Posts: 136 Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chris_zeel wrote:
My SMC Takumar 55/2 is very pleasant to work with.
I must admit that more my Japanese lenses have smoother focussing than German or Russian ones.
When the focussing of a lens is not ideal, I find myself reluctant to use them and often clean and relube them.
My Jupiter 9 has a bit tough focussing, even after I relubed it, so I kind of neglected it, while it's the most expensive lens of my modest collection. I'm thinking of giving it another service soon. _________________ DSLR: Canon 6D, Canon 400D
SLR: Praktica MTL5, Topcon RE-2, Topcon RE Super, Nikon EM, Chinon CE-3 Memotron, Pentacon F, Zenit 12-XP
Rangefinder: Zorki 4K, Ricoh 500G, Olympus 35 SP, Neoca 2S
Folder: Afga Isolette-I
Compact: Olympus mju-I
AF: Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 XR Di LD
Exakta: Meyer-Optik Trioplan 50/2.9, Primagon 35/4.5
M42: Sigma Mini Wide 28/2.8, Auto Chinon 28/2.8, Meyer-Optik Lydith 30/3.5, Pentacon Electric 29/2.8, Mir 1b 37/2.8, Super-Takumar 50/1.4, Meyer-Optik Oreston 50 f/1.8, Auto Yashinon 50/2, CZJ Tessar T 50/2.8, E. Ludwig Meritar 50/2.9, Meyer-Optik Primotar E 50/3.5, Industar 50-2 50/3.5, SMC Takumar 55/2, CZJ Biotar 58/2, Helios 44 58 f/2, Jupiter-9 85 f/2, Meyer-Optik 85/3.5, Super-Takumar 105/2.8, Accura Super Tc 135/2.8, Pentacon Zebra 135/2.8, Jupiter-11 135 f/4, Chinon MC Auto 200/3.5, Accura Supertel Tc 200/4.5, Soligor C/D Macro+Zoom 80-200/4.5
F-mount: Nikon Series E 28/2.8, 50/1.8, 100/2.8, Nikkor-S 35/2.8, Nikkor-H.C 50/2, Nikkor-H 85/1.8
Topcon: RE Auto Topcor 35/2.8, RE. Auto Topcor 58/1.8, RE. Auto Topcor 135/3.5
OM: Zuiko Auto-S 50/1. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jjphoto
Joined: 17 Mar 2009 Posts: 410
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jjphoto wrote:
Wide open sharpness is the most critical factor for accurate focusing, regardless of the focus throw or it's feel. If the image you are focusing on is slightly unsharp then it becomes difficult to pinpoint exact focus. Admitedly any play in the focus is a show stopper for me and that's the only reason I avoid most Nikkors, having had many in the past that have had such slop I just avoid them altogether these days.
Last edited by jjphoto on Sat Mar 30, 2013 11:32 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Victor Nguyen
Joined: 02 Aug 2012 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Victor Nguyen wrote:
jjphoto wrote: |
Everyone should have one! |
Not everyone are rich _________________ Nikkor 24mm f2.8 ai, Rokinon/Samyang 35mm f 1.4, Nikkor 55 f2.8 micro ais, Rokinon/Samyang 85mm f 1.4, Pentacon 135 "bokeh monster" f 2.8, Contax Zeiss 180 f 2.8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Billou
Joined: 01 Feb 2013 Posts: 169 Location: Germany
Expire: 2015-05-19
|
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Billou wrote:
Re Auto Topcor 58mm f/1.8. Just perfect. It's slowly becoming my favorite lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Nordentro wrote: |
hoanpham wrote: |
Any lens with long focus throw, but also smooth, even, precise and damped. |
+1 |
+1 _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ray Parkhurst
Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Posts: 504 Location: Santa Clara, CA, USA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ray Parkhurst wrote:
jjphoto wrote: |
Wide open sharpness is the most critical factor for accurate focusing, regardless of the focus throw or it's feel. |
Could not agree more. I find that the only lenses I am able to trust the focus accuracy on are apochromats. Longitudinal CA makes focusing very ambiguous, and results in either poor sharpness or odd color presentations. Ironically, the net effect is that sharp apochromats are actually quite difficult to focus since they have literally one plane where they are in critical focus. Less sharp lenses are easier to focus since they maintain a level of semi-focus over a wider depth of field. Their aberrations tend to obscure the range of critical focus in a similar way as if they were stopped-down. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
ForenSeil wrote: |
I generally prefer a short way to focus |
Me too. There is a tradeoff between focusing accuracy and speed, but some lenses have too long focus throw. One lens that comes to mind is a famous Kiron macro, it just goes on forever. However, Kiron is a heavy macro, probably mostly used on tripod, so that's understandable. Pentacon 135mm is not a macro and has almost 360 degrees focus throw, that's way too long and not really needed, I prefer something between 1/2 and 3/4 turn on 135mm lens. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jjphoto
Joined: 17 Mar 2009 Posts: 410
|
Posted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jjphoto wrote:
Ray Parkhurst wrote: |
... Less sharp lenses are easier to focus since they maintain a level of semi-focus over a wider depth of field. Their aberrations tend to obscure the range of critical focus in a similar way as if they were stopped-down. |
What that's really saying is that unsharp lenses don't benefit from being focused accurately, which may be true, but I don't think that makes them easier to focus. If anything I think that makes them harder to focus (accurately), but it probably makes less difference if they aren't properly focused. However a lens is only ever accurately focused at one point and it is either accurately focused or it isn't (IMHO), even if it isn't very sharp in the first place. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|