View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5042 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:10 pm Post subject: Too old look |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
I tried some 1969 expired Ilford FP 3 with my Nettar 515/16. Developed it too cold but propably also for too long. The I put it into stantard flatbed scanner backed by white paper and got me nice 700x700 pictures.
Purpose was to get something you could see from the 1920's to about 1950's.
But instead I have reached the quality of first wet-plate pioneers, really don't have a clue what went so terribly wrong.
#1 impressionistic
#2 this is the only even sligthly acceptable
#3 Daguerre would have tossed this one to the bin and probably stopped experimenting
#4 yes, it is a locomotive, but you can't see the rails
#5 even succeeded creating a double exposure
_________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
I would say you have accomplished a convincing imitation! _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5042 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
Some of the problems are obviously scanning, because negatives aren't that bad when I took a photo thru window.
Which one is it: old film or some bad processing?
No pp here (except the negative conversion by Gimp).
this is what the negative looks like.
_________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Film wasn't stored properly and perhaps fixing wasn't enough long too, this is my guess. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I shot some 1985 expired improperly stored FP4 a few days ago. Results were not bad.
I rated it at ISO 64 as it would have lost speed, but seems it is still 80-100 ISO (originally 125).
When you try again, rate the film at half it's speed and push the developing a little, say 10%.
Fixer, leave it in twice the time stated, won't do any harm, seems to me your first results are under-fixed. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5042 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Fixer, leave it in twice the time stated, won't do any harm, seems to me your first results are under-fixed. |
Ok, I did fix it for 10 minutes, maybe the cold temperature was to blame too ..
Any idea why the spots? _________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5042 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
I shot some 1985 expired improperly stored FP4 a few days ago. Results were not bad.
I rated it at ISO 64 as it would have lost speed, but seems it is still 80-100 ISO (originally 125).
When you try again, rate the film at half it's speed and push the developing a little, say 10%. |
Overexpose and overdevelop both?
So this film is from 1969 125-200 ASA (yes the package says 125-200) - I should treat it as 50? _________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I think b&w film not loose it's speed. I did develop successfully similar aged films ISO50 , ISO100 films I also got crap result too, so evidence to me , storage is very important. I got similar crap like yours when I did fix for short time and once on fresh efke film reason is still unknown to me. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
erkie
Joined: 08 Oct 2011 Posts: 308 Location: Missouri
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
erkie wrote:
Looks as though it has gotten too warm a time or two in storage . I've had a roll or three come out badly when left in my truck in the summer . _________________
I shoot film and meter with digital
Asahi H3v, Praktica FX3, Retina IIa, Spotmatic sp1000, Fujica V2, Yashica lynx5000, Pentax Sf1, Minolta SRT102, Minolta7000i, Pentax MX, Pentax ME, Pentax Kx
lensesM42- Isco Gottingen Westanar 50/2.8, Isco Gottingen Westron 35/2.8, Rikenon 35/2.8, Spiratone Tc 105/2.5, Spiratone Tc 200/4.5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 300/5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 135/3.5, Auto Tak 35/3.5, Super Tak 150/4, S-M-C Tak 50/1.4, S-M-C Tak 28/3.5, SMC Tak 55/2, Mamya Sekor 55/1.8
K- mount- Helios 44-K-4, Jc penny 28/2.8, Da 18-55, Da 55-300, Pentax F 35-70, SMCP M 50/1.4, SMCP M 50/1.7
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
kansalliskala wrote: |
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
I shot some 1985 expired improperly stored FP4 a few days ago. Results were not bad.
I rated it at ISO 64 as it would have lost speed, but seems it is still 80-100 ISO (originally 125).
When you try again, rate the film at half it's speed and push the developing a little, say 10%. |
Overexpose and overdevelop both?
So this film is from 1969 125-200 ASA (yes the package says 125-200) - I should treat it as 50? |
Well, I shot the fp4 I have at 64 then developed it for 11 mins instead of the 10 on the instruction sheet for the developer.
Worked okay, doesn't seem to have lost a great deal of speed, it would probably be fine rated at 100.
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5042 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
Thank you very much for valuable information!
Could someone move this to 'darkroom' section. What started as experiment produced some real knowledge. _________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4744 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
maybe some of the problem is how you scanned your film. I have had similar problem scanning negs same way look:
could be your prob... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|