View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:14 am Post subject: Washed out background with fast lenses |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
I've noticed many times that when photographing with fast lenses wide open you often get the the subject well exposed and contrasty but the background tends to be washed out, nearly high key. Anyone else seeing this. Why is it?
I don't have a good example right now but I will see what I can find. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hifisapi
Joined: 25 Sep 2012 Posts: 941 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
hifisapi wrote:
I havent found that to be the case, sometimes the background is dark. _________________ ===========
ACQUIRED OVER 30 YEARS:
Cameras: DSLR=Pentax istDS FILM=Pentax SP, SP-F, ESII, SP1000, KX, K2
Lenses : Pentax M42 = Super Multi Coated Takumars 50/1.4 55/1.8 100/4-BELLOWS 500/4.5 1000/8 135-600/6.7 Pentax PK= SMC Pentax-Ks K17/4-FF Fisheye K18/3.5 K20/4 K24/3.5 K28/3.5 K28/2 K35/3.5 K35/2 K50/1.2 K50/1.4K 50/4-MACROK 55/1.8 K85/1.8 K100/4-MACRO K100/4-BELLOWS K105/2.8 K120/2.8 K135/3.5 K135/2.5 K150/4 K200/4 K400/5.6 K45-125/4K 85-210/4.5 Pentax PKM = SMC Pentax-M M40/2.8-Pancake M50/1.4 M75-150/4 M80-200/4.5 Pentax PKA= SMC Pentax-A A15/3.5 A50/2.8-MACRO A28/2 A35/2 A50/1.4 A135/2.8 A200/4 A*300/4 A35-105/3.5 A24-50/4 A70-210/4 TAMRON AD2= SP80-200/2.8 SP180/2.5 TOKINA AT-X PK= ATX28-85/3.5-4.5 ATX35-70/2.8 ATX60-120/2.8 ATX80-200/2.8 ATX100-300/4 ATX90/2.5 MACRO KIRON-LESTER DINE PK = 105/2.8-MACRO VIVITAR PK = 135/2.8-MACRO 28-85/4 NOFLEXAR AUTOBELLOWS PK = 60/4 105/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pich900
Joined: 10 Jun 2007 Posts: 1745 Location: The Netherlands/Zwolle
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:39 am Post subject: Re: Washed out background with fast lenses |
|
|
pich900 wrote:
Pontus wrote: |
I've noticed many times that when photographing with fast lenses wide open you often get the the subject well exposed and contrasty but the background tends to be washed out, nearly high key. Anyone else seeing this. Why is it?
I don't have a good example right now but I will see what I can find. |
I guess it's depending which metering are you using on your camera!...With center or spot metering (light mesuring on the subject) is the chance that your background will be overexposed, at least that's my experience! _________________ All my lenses are for sale, nikkor, Angenieux, Zeiss etc.....
Regards,
Pascal
-------------------------------------------------------
Nikon D700 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
Here's an example. Look at the 2nd photo: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-1-2-55mm-aspherical-venezia-mask-portraits-t54376,highlight,%2Bcanon+%2Baspherical.html
Please note, I absolutely love these pictures, bringing them up in this thread is not to be seen as negative critique. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:05 am Post subject: Re: Washed out background with fast lenses |
|
|
Attila wrote:
pich900 wrote: |
Pontus wrote: |
I've noticed many times that when photographing with fast lenses wide open you often get the the subject well exposed and contrasty but the background tends to be washed out, nearly high key. Anyone else seeing this. Why is it?
I don't have a good example right now but I will see what I can find. |
I guess it's depending which metering are you using on your camera!...With center or spot metering (light mesuring on the subject) is the chance that your background will be overexposed, at least that's my experience! |
+1 _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jjphoto
Joined: 17 Mar 2009 Posts: 414
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
jjphoto wrote:
It has nothing to do with the speed of the lens. Its just dependant on the scene and metering. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sonyrokkor
Joined: 24 Sep 2012 Posts: 222 Location: Perù, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:37 am Post subject: Re: Washed out background with fast lenses |
|
|
sonyrokkor wrote:
pich900 wrote: |
Pontus wrote: |
I've noticed many times that when photographing with fast lenses wide open you often get the the subject well exposed and contrasty but the background tends to be washed out, nearly high key. Anyone else seeing this. Why is it?
I don't have a good example right now but I will see what I can find. |
I guess it's depending which metering are you using on your camera!...With center or spot metering (light mesuring on the subject) is the chance that your background will be overexposed, at least that's my experience! |
Depending what do you "put" at the spot of the meter.
If you spot on the clear image (like with the slides) you will metering for the high lights, so the background never be overexposed.
When you do that and the foreground is dark, so move the spot untill you find the exposure that you like.
It's easy.
You never had that adventage with film. In the old times, you have to use polaroid back to "preview" the image.
Today the LCD let us almost All. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
skida
Joined: 02 Mar 2012 Posts: 1826 Location: North East England
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
skida wrote:
On that particular shot, I think the subject was in shadow, or muted light, while the buildings behind were in sunlight. The shot is perfectly exposed for the subject's face. On other shots I guess blurred highlights spread and merge, which would give a washed out look too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
jjphoto wrote: |
It has nothing to do with the speed of the lens. Its just dependant on the scene and metering. |
Perhaps. But it is my feeling that with a very large aperture there is a lot of background blur and bokeh highlights. These bokeh highlights seem to suck in light which gives an impression of a lighter background. I don't know, I guess it's my imagination again _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sonyrokkor
Joined: 24 Sep 2012 Posts: 222 Location: Perù, Argentina, Chile, Uruguay
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
sonyrokkor wrote:
And when the well expose background needs the subject in dark shadows, so reduce the ratio between the high lights and the loiw lights.
Let me say in other words, change the background, choose any other without high lights.
Or let the high light stay there, but....... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
skida wrote: |
On other shots I guess blurred highlights spread and merge, which would give a washed out look too. |
Oh, what a great way to put it. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jjphoto
Joined: 17 Mar 2009 Posts: 414
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
jjphoto wrote:
Pontus wrote: |
jjphoto wrote: |
It has nothing to do with the speed of the lens. Its just dependant on the scene and metering. |
Perhaps. But it is my feeling that with a very large aperture there is a lot of background blur and bokeh highlights. These bokeh highlights seem to suck in light which gives an impression of a lighter background. I don't know, I guess it's my imagination again |
The biggest problem with fast lenses is simply that they often vignette more than slow lenses so the cntral part of the frame is often quite a lot brighter then the edges.
Last edited by jjphoto on Mon Apr 01, 2013 6:55 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
Ok, as the photographer of the images you refer to, i will give some explanations..
Yes.. first it has to do with the kind of metering.. i activated the spot measurement on the 5D MKII. The light conditions were poor during the venezian carnival session and so i decided to take the very fast lens wide open.
As you can see in those pictures, most of the details are dark.. and i need to have correct metering for the skins of the models..
If you measure a dark surface, the spotmeter trys to bring the exposure to the average value of 18% grey.. no mater if you measure dark details or white surfaces.. he will try to give you the average 18% value..
And in the shown and refered images, there are lots of dark details..
With this very fast lens all details in the background would completely wash out if you should try to shot with that spotmetering.. so you have to do a little compromise..
In addition to that, this models are "amateurs".. so the walk very fast.. and with a fast and manual lens, you have to concentrate yourself on the focuswork.. there are lots pihotpgraphers around you and the models.. so you have not time to switch on your camera or do some other work ... thats why i decided to do the following before i start shooting:
I measured my own hands in that situationen.. in german we call this "Ersatzmessung".. lets take the words equivalent measurement and shot in fully M-Mode. First make a measurement, holding the measurd hand of yourself in shadow position and after that measure the reflection of the sky on your hand...
This was the ideal way for quick action photography with a manual lens, because the diffus light condition was on every place, the models walk around.. no shadow.. nothing.
So this was a weighted measurment for giving me the possibility to concentrate myself on the focuswork and have perfect reflektion of the skin surface..
Because of this kind of metering, the light details in the background must be overexposed.. and this has nothing to do with how fast the lens is.. its indeed metering.. and in addition to that the very, very short DOF of a 1.2/55mm lens.
Cheers
Henry _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
Thank you Henry for your detailed explanation, it's appreciated! One thing though, what exactly do you mean by your statement "and in addition to that the very, very short DOF of a 1.2/55mm lens".
I was asking if fast lenses under some conditions render the background brighter than slower lenses, and what you wrote gives me the impression that there is something to it because of the shallow DOF. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 929 Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
Pontus wrote: |
.....
I was asking if fast lenses under some conditions render the background brighter than slower lenses, and what you wrote gives me the impression that there is something to it because of the shallow DOF. |
IMHO they gives greater "circle of confusion" so every reflecting highlight seemed to be brighter.. compaired with a slower lens.. maybe thats what you mean and ask?
But thats a normal effect of a 1.2/5x lens..
Look, this was taken with a Porst 1.2/55mm lens
If you would close the lens aperture to lets say f2 or 2.8... you would have smaller circle of confusion in the image backgraound and lot more details.. thats what i meant with the DOF remark.
Cheers
Henry _________________ some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
This is exactly what I mean. So maybe I haven't been imagining things after all _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|