View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:58 am Post subject: Nasty stripes on negative |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Any idea what cause it ?
Camera was Rolleiflex-T so I not expect film is injured by camera.
#1
_________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
berraneck
Joined: 24 May 2009 Posts: 972 Location: prague, czech republic
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
berraneck wrote:
is that Foma200 film? _________________ equipment doesn´t count, good photographs do |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
Is it on all your negatives, or just that one? Is this roll or cassette film? What kind of thing did you load it into for developing (e.g., a spool.) _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
std
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Posts: 1826 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
std wrote:
Those look like scratches from camera transport to me. Do you see them on the negative if you look with a loupe?
Otherwise the image is nice - it's worth making a large print on a baryta paper.
The scratches only will contribute to the vintage look _________________ Stefan
My lens list:
SLR MD: Rokkor 1,7/50 Exakta: Kilfitt-Makro-Kilar E 3.5/4cm; CZJ 2/50 Pancolar;M42: CZJ 2.8/50 Tessar; Mir-1B 2.8/37; Jupiter-9 2/85 T-mount: Tamron 5.9/200; Tamron 6.9/300; Tamron 7.5/400 C-mount: Cosmicar 1.8/50 Y/S: Sun 3.5/38-90, Sun 4/70-210 RF Contax RF: Jupiter-8 2/50; Contax G:CZ 2,8/21 Biogon T; CZ 2,8/28 Biogon T; CZ 2/35 Planar T; CZ 2/45 Planar T; CZ 2,8/90 Sonnar T |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
The scratches are very regular so there is no doubt in me that it's a transport problem.
It can be either the camera, the film, or your film loader if you used one. If this is Foma film,
there are chances that the film is part of the damaged stocks that were around a couple of years
ago, mostly of Fomapan 200 film, but also of the other speeds. It was a problem in Foma coating
machines that was later repaired. But sincerely, it seems too much for me to be the film. My most
suspect is the Rollei camera. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Orio wrote: |
The scratches are very regular so there is no doubt in me that it's a transport problem.
It can be either the camera, the film, or your film loader if you used one. If this is Foma film,
there are chances that the film is part of the damaged stocks that were around a couple of years
ago, mostly of Fomapan 200 film, but also of the other speeds. It was a problem in Foma coating
machines that was later repaired. But sincerely, it seems too much for me to be the film. My most
suspect is the Rollei camera. |
As above........An example of when I forgot to use my Watson bulk loader properly:-
_________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Thank you for all hints, 120 film so no bulk loading , Fomapan 100 I bought 10 rolls , none of other rolls shows these tripes, stripes are visible with loupe on negative.
Seems camera but hard to belive this is happen with a Rolleiflex T, camera was a loan and sold long time ago to local buyer. He is never brought back with issue. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
twinquartz
Joined: 11 Jun 2012 Posts: 316 Location: Sweden
Expire: 2013-10-29
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
twinquartz wrote:
Another guess: back then, we used
our fingers to draw off any water from the
neg to make it dry faster (or a pair of "sponge-tweezers").
If the sponge (or fingers) were severly unclean,
nasty streaks would appear. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
twinquartz wrote: |
Another guess: back then, we used
our fingers to draw off any water from the
neg to make it dry faster (or a pair of "sponge-tweezers").
If the sponge (or fingers) were severly unclean,
nasty streaks would appear. |
Yes , good guess. I didn't use it. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I did call my friend who sold camera and I did ask why camera didn't return, he did response , perhaps already camera was ruined inside , or dirty and I didn't recognize little sand, but new owner clean it or new owner simple bought as collection and never use it. He said strip 90% chance ruined by camera. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Yes, what has happened I think is some roughness of the edge of the film gate has scratched the film, sometimes doesn't take much. A rollei will have nicely finished metal on it's gate so it probably had some very small pieces of dirt/grit on the gate and those scratched the film. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|