Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Carl Zeiss Planar 1.4/85 CY nex5n
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:21 pm    Post subject: Carl Zeiss Planar 1.4/85 CY nex5n Reply with quote

Thank you Tony for this lens.

Some few samples taken with nex5n, no PP than standard sharpening when resize for web.
All shot wide open.

#1


#2


#3


#4


#5


#6


#7


PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WOW! Very sharp and pleasant boked.


PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like #3 most Smile you should combine it with #4 Smile
Bokeh is always a matter of taste an subject, in some shots I like it in others not! It's indeed sharp but blueish CA's are pretty eye-pooping in some situations. Is this normal or are the elements slightly decentered?


PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks fantastic Very Happy


PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Where is the blue CA? I honestly can't see it.


PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 8:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Last pic. The Planar can show this in extreme circumstances wide open sometimes.


PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 8:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can see a little fringe between the white shirt of the lady and the black of the man and perhaps some on his jeans.

Hardly eye-popping though.


PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

congrats hoanpham, the Nex look good for wide open focusing


PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Congrats! Great lens I love it too.


PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the sample Smile


PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, that is nice!


PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 12:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Hardly eye-popping though.


That was "eye pooping", which is different. Wink


PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 1:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is what I'd call 'eye-pooping' CA Wink



PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
This is what I'd call 'eye-pooping' CA Wink



That looks like operator error to me.


PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Never let a joke distract you from a trolling opportunity, eh?


PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Never let a joke distract you from a trolling opportunity, eh?




PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 5:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm new to manual focus photography, how do you guys even do it with moving people?


PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 6:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Victor Nguyen wrote:
I'm new to manual focus photography, how do you guys even do it with moving people?


1. Practice.
2. Prediction.
3. More practice.
4. We don't show the failures. Smile

K.


PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 6:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great stuff! I don't know if it's worth the price of the Samyang though...


PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Omar wrote:
womble wrote:
Victor Nguyen wrote:
I'm new to manual focus photography, how do you guys even do it with moving people?


1. Practice.
2. Prediction.
3. More practice.
4. We don't show the failures. Smile

K.


Laughing So true!


It's not as hard. I get used to mf lenses and never think about that. Tracking moving object, esp action kids, one needs to feel the lens how it focuses, and mostly estimate the distance between camera and subject. Some vivitars have very short focus throw and useless for tracking object. In general, short distance has too much throw, near infinity has too short throw - all in between is possible.


PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ducdao wrote:
WOW! Very sharp and pleasant boked.

Thanks Duc. I also have the FA*84/1.4. Both are very different. I can't tell which one I am prefer. My copy of FA85 auto focus badly near infinity, but portrait distances, it's very good.

ForenSeil wrote:
I like #3 most Smile you should combine it with #4 Smile
Bokeh is always a matter of taste an subject, in some shots I like it in others not! It's indeed sharp but blueish CA's are pretty eye-pooping in some situations. Is this normal or are the elements slightly decentered?

#3 and #4 are in the same spot, same time.

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Where is the blue CA? I honestly can't see it.

ManualFocus-G wrote:
Last pic. The Planar can show this in extreme circumstances wide open sometimes.

Ian and Graham,
The lens has blue CA/PF, but in-focus area it is ok.

SonicScot wrote:
Looks fantastic Very Happy

woodrim wrote:
Oh, that is nice!

Thanks. yes, the lens is awesome.

aleksanderpolo wrote:
Thanks for the sample Smile

You are welcome.

poilu wrote:
congrats hoanpham, the Nex look good for wide open focusing

Attila wrote:
Congrats! Great lens I love it too.

Thanks guys. I have long time wish for this lens.

TijmenDal wrote:
Great stuff! I don't know if it's worth the price of the Samyang though...

The samyang/rokinon costs approx 300-340usd new, I may pick that lens later if fund allow, not my 1st priority. Build quality is not the same.


There are several things I have in mind when first using this lens:
- it is known for high contrast, or black level micro contrast, so I prefer darker or colorful objects
- it is known for 3D rending. My fav photo is #1. There are lots of people so i just pick a random crowd. Distance should have dof cover the whole subject.
- There are mix opinion regarding bokeh.
- Last photo of dancing pair illustrates the CA/PF.

I have one more sample, about +1.3EV over exposure, then adjust black level in PP: