View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:32 pm Post subject: Leica Elmarit-R 2.8/35mm & D700 |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
Below a shot with Leica Elmarit-R 2.8/35mm (E55) and Nikon D700 taken during a late evening walk.
_________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Super Rolf
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
Beautiful.
Personally, I prefer more light in the sky, about 10-15min earlier, with dark blue. That should enhance the profile of the building.
Sparkling stars in dark blue sky is too much to ask. And I am no good at all in PP and HDR. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
hoanpham wrote: |
Beautiful.
Personally, I prefer more light in the sky, about 10-15min earlier, with dark blue. That should enhance the profile of the building.
Sparkling stars in dark blue sky is too much to ask. And I am no good at all in PP and HDR. |
Thanks all for your friendly comments.
I prefer the blue hour too. But in this particular image the floodlights will be only on if it is more darken outside. Sparkling star you will see here with your eyes but with the sensor it's unfortunately almost impossible due to the lights of the great towns around. And yes, I needed some PP but it is no HDR.
_________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
I am not known the capability of d700/d800, but the nex5n has dynamic range level 5 which i found useful in some cases. Still the differences are too much in this scene. perhaps 2 photos on tripod and hdr in pp? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yebisu
Joined: 13 Feb 2011 Posts: 1299
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yebisu wrote:
Up to your usual high standard Rolf. Very nice. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nisseliten
Joined: 26 May 2012 Posts: 332 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nisseliten wrote:
Sorry Rolf, but this one just doesn't do it for me. Nice composition but I'm not "feeling it" like I usually do from your work unfortunately.
I own two of the Elmarit 2.8/35, and neither of them impress me either for that matter.
Maybe I am partial because of that. _________________
DSLR: Canon 550D, Panasonic DMC-GF3
SLR: Leica R3mot electronic, Leica R4s, Leica R4mot electronic. and more.
Medium Format: Many.
Lenses
Leica: 19/2.8, 35/2, 35/2.8x2, 50/2, 60/2.8 macro, 90/2, 90/2.8, 180/3.4, 250/4, 500/8 T-Noflexar 400/5.6
Other: When will it end?!
Canon: 50/1.8, 70-200 f4 IS
Last edited by Nisseliten on Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:00 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jon E
Joined: 24 Aug 2012 Posts: 132 Location: Kalispell, MT
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jon E wrote:
Beautiful!! _________________ I Shoot Everything
SLR ~ Minolta XE-7 Rokkor-X 85mm f/1.7, Rokkor-X 300mm f4.5, Tokina AT-X 35-70mm f/2.8, Soligor Tele-Auto 200mm, f/2.8, Rokkor-X 50mm f/1.7, Sigma Mini Wide 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 80-200 f/3.5, Albinar 75-300mm f/5.6
DSLR ~ Canon EOS 30D, Canon EF 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM, 85mm f/1.7, Rokkor-X 300mm f4.5, Tokina AT-X 35-70mm f/2.8, Soligor Tele-Auto 200mm, f/2.8, Rokkor-X 50mm f/1.7, Sigma Mini Wide 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 80-200 f/3.5, Albinar 75-300mm f/5.6
Bridge Camera ~ Fuji HS20EXR, Fixed 30X MF 24-720mm lens |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
Nisseliten wrote: |
Sorry Rolf, but this one just doesn't do it for me. Nice composition but I'm not "feeling it" like I usually do from your work unfortunately.
I own two of the Elmarit 2.8/35, and neither of them impress me either for that matter.
Maybe I am partial because of that. |
No problem.
I own also 2 of these 2.8/35, this one and the first version, which I have converted now for Pentax P/K. With the first version I was unhappy too, nothing special. I feel, the second is much better. Will look into my archive, perhaps I will find some "better" images.
_________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nisseliten
Joined: 26 May 2012 Posts: 332 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nisseliten wrote:
I've always heard great things, and if anyone can prove it it's you. Both of mine are from the first version, so it's not a real surprise if I'm not too fond of one, the second is essentially the same. _________________
DSLR: Canon 550D, Panasonic DMC-GF3
SLR: Leica R3mot electronic, Leica R4s, Leica R4mot electronic. and more.
Medium Format: Many.
Lenses
Leica: 19/2.8, 35/2, 35/2.8x2, 50/2, 60/2.8 macro, 90/2, 90/2.8, 180/3.4, 250/4, 500/8 T-Noflexar 400/5.6
Other: When will it end?!
Canon: 50/1.8, 70-200 f4 IS
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
Below another sample with D700 and Elmarit-R 2.8/35mm
_________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nisseliten
Joined: 26 May 2012 Posts: 332 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nisseliten wrote:
That's more like it
Hard to see a difference in resolution, but it renders very nicely. _________________
DSLR: Canon 550D, Panasonic DMC-GF3
SLR: Leica R3mot electronic, Leica R4s, Leica R4mot electronic. and more.
Medium Format: Many.
Lenses
Leica: 19/2.8, 35/2, 35/2.8x2, 50/2, 60/2.8 macro, 90/2, 90/2.8, 180/3.4, 250/4, 500/8 T-Noflexar 400/5.6
Other: When will it end?!
Canon: 50/1.8, 70-200 f4 IS
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|