View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 1:32 pm Post subject: rokkor 45/2. Underrated? So much!!! |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
I have seen some pics taken with nex 3 and 4 minolta's lenses.
1- 45/2
2- 35/1,8
3-35/2,8 mc
4-35/,2,8 md.
In all the casus were used f/4 to f/8.
The pics where the 45/2 was used at f/8 win over the rest (yes) the 35/1,8 included.
Wanderful and cheap lens!!!!!
Anything is wrong? Don't understad very well, can't beleave this.
Any experience?
Rino _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
I like this lens: it's small, sharp, and the focal length is not very common. Here's the size comparison with Canon FD 50/1.4 and Hexanon AR 40/1.8 on their respective m4/3 adapters. I think it also shows a downside of this lens: the size advantage over 1.4 lens is not that great, while 1 stop difference is quite significant.
IQ is quite good, certainly good enough for me. I don't think however, that it stands out compared to other good normals. I'll keep it, however, because it's the only 45mm lens that I have.
_________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
It's tiny, good and cheap.
#1 at f2.0
#2 at f2.0
Last edited by hoanpham on Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:40 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Minolta made good lenses shame how people not respect most of them. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I think it's the best cheap pancake available. I have Rokkor 2/45, Hexanon 1.8/40, Pentacon 2.4/50 and had Yashica ML 2/50, they are all the same size - tiny.
The Yashica is perhaps the sharpest but the Rokkor is the one I liked most, very smooth rendering and bokeh, rich colours, sharp even wide open. It's not the greatest technically but the character is very attractive. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Minolta made really great lenses.
The Minolta MD 50/2 is also really great and as underrated as the 45/2. For my taste the 50/2 is optically the best manual ~50mm lens I've ever had (and I had many of them, some of them were 20 times more expensive). _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
For me the only real drawback with the 45 is that it doesn't focus as close as the Minolta 50's. Otherwise, a wonderful lens. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Almost all 50/55/58 mm rokkor lenses seem to have better rendering than the 2/45. Or at least the same at f/5,8-8.
Different with 35 mm lenses? Is the 45 lens better fhan the mc and md 35's?
From that fact the 45 shoul be more and better watched like a moderate wide angle than a normal lenses.
A good partner to the 100/2,5 rokkor?
Rino _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hatch
Joined: 19 Feb 2012 Posts: 30 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hatch wrote:
The way Minoltas are priced, getting them all shouldn't be such a problem.
The cult lenses excepted of course.
Those are pricey relatively speaking.
Minoltas are my favorites with the NEX7.
Prefer them over my Leitz tbh |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
estudleon wrote: |
Almost all 50/55/58 mm rokkor lenses seem to have better rendering than the 2/45. Or at least the same at f/5,8-8.
...
From that fact the 45 shoul be more and better watched like a moderate wide angle than a normal lenses.
|
How can it be a wide angle if most people today are using it on crop cameras? _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
The term wide angle is not absolute, but relative to the focal lengh taken like " normal ". If you read adecuately thr tread, can see that the 50/55/58 are taken as normal lenses.
The little size of your sensor, isn't a lens problem, is yours.
Inside this reference, the 45 mm can be considered like a moderate wide angle lens, not matter how little your senzor can be
Anyways, can you do any serious aport? _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar.
Last edited by estudleon on Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:40 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tromboads
Joined: 29 May 2012 Posts: 1655 Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
tromboads wrote:
I've wanted a 40ish lens for a while now, just sunk some cash on a 45mm in which I will adapt to take a pentax K-mount.
Weeeee |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
estudleon wrote: |
The term wide angle is not absolute, but relative to the focal lengh taken like " normal ". If you read adecuately thr tread, can see that the 50/55/58 are taken as normal lenses.
...
Inside this reference, the 45 mm can be considered like a moderate wide angle lens, not matter how little your senzor can be
...
|
I simply don't think that re-defining well established terminology has any justification here: terms "normal", "wide", and "tele" has long been related to the FOV, and used that way they have photographic meaning, while your redefinitions don't.
For example on APS-C 35mm is a normal, while 45mm is a short tele, I don't think there is any basis for comparison of these lenses in APS-C context as the usage is too different. On m4/3 both will be short teles and the basis for comparison reappears, but it's completely different to such basis on Minolta film camera, where 35-45mm is wide-normal to normal. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
I agree respect the little sensors. I hope that the ff will come more accesible. The results seem to not let comparison. For example the pics i watched taken using a canon ff are stunning. And with almost any kind of lenses. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vlousada
Joined: 11 Dec 2010 Posts: 345 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vlousada wrote:
I like this small Minolta lens too...
I also tend to use Rokkor with Sony cameras (NEX-3). I believe the sony's sensor and minolta signature in lenses work very well together
I have rokkors 35 f/1.8 and 45 f/2 and guess what: - the little rokkor 45mm f/2 IS MY FRONT CAP of NEX camera!!!
Pros:
a) fantastic size in camera;
b) not so long with adapter , Thus can be used with the Nex's flash;
c) really sharp lens.
cons:
d) to me the only downsize is: focus ring is small (at least compared with 1.8 version) and to sometimes with low light and "fast actions" it is hard to spot the focus... The rokkor 35mm f/1.8 has a much longer focusing ring so (to me) work better to focus precisely.
A little GEM indeed.
Regards _________________ Regards,
VITOR
-------
SELLING:
Please ask
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
A FRONT CAP???? OHH......
If you take an accidental pic it should be a good one _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vlousada
Joined: 11 Dec 2010 Posts: 345 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vlousada wrote:
estudleon wrote: |
A FRONT CAP???? OHH......
If you take an accidental pic it should be a good one |
So TRUE, that I also forgot to include this lens in my profile signature!!!
(Surely was on camera and not among the others lenses when start inventoring...) _________________ Regards,
VITOR
-------
SELLING:
Please ask
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|