| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
laenee
Joined: 31 Jan 2011
Posts: 370
Location: Shanghai
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:51 am Post subject: CARL ZEISS JEAN DDR PANCOLAR ELECTRIC 80/1.8 M42 silverring |
 |
|
laenee wrote:
On NEX_5
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007
Posts: 8551
Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Clearly a fine lens and very nicely presented
patrickh
_________________
DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
f1.2
Joined: 12 May 2012
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
f1.2 wrote:
Nickname : Big P
You must select MC Electric M42 with Silver Ring Ver. it is rare one |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tervueren
Joined: 18 May 2011
Posts: 1177
Location: West Sussex, United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-08
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tervueren wrote:
Very nice but please tell me that she's not really riding that 'moped' with oven gloves on  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Smoli4
Joined: 01 Jul 2011
Posts: 606
Location: Haifa, Israel
Expire: 2013-06-07
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Smoli4 wrote:
| Tervueren wrote: |
| Very nice but please tell me that she's not really riding that 'moped' with oven gloves on |
nooo, these are not oven gloves  I laughed when we saw a guy on a moped with those gloves, so these are hand warmers so your hands wont freeze in the cold wind  that way you can hold the steering and gas with your bare hands so i guess its more comfortable then with gloves on... yeah.....
well i dont have an opinion on all that, except it looks funny and strange
_________________
Canon 6D + Mir 24, SMC Tak 50 f1.4, 135 f2.5 V2, Tamron SP 90mm f2.5 52B, mcMTO 500 8, Canon IS USM 75-300 4.5-5.6, zeiss ikon talon 85 f2.8 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
izvar
Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Posts: 252
Location: Moldova
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
izvar wrote:
very good photos, but do not see anything superspecial in this lens. I heard too many nice things about Pancolar 80. Why better than rokkor 85/1.7 or Zuiko 85/2 or takumar 85/1.9. Not understand its market price. Well, seems to be unreasonably high.
maybe someone made some comparisons in this FL range. Forum has very much info about range 50-58 and very few in 80-85 or maybe I'm too demanding?
_________________
“The hardest thing of all is to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if there is no cat.”
― Confucius |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007
Posts: 2190
Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
| Quote: |
very good photos, but do not see anything superspecial in this lens. I heard too many nice things about Pancolar 80. Why better than rokkor 85/1.7 or Zuiko 85/2 or takumar 85/1.9. Not understand its market price. Well, seems to be unreasonably high.
maybe someone made some comparisons in this FL range. Forum has very much info about range 50-58 and very few in 80-85 or maybe I'm too demanding? |
I do not have experience with the Rokkor or Zuiko but I have the S-M-C Takumar 1.8/85 (supposedly the best of pentax's m42 line). In respect to the Takumar, the Pancolar is sharper wide-open, has more dimensional rendering, better colors, and has a more unique background blur. I hate to say it but I don't see these strengths in the pictures either. If you look elsewhere it is clearer. The market price may be slightly inflated but for what some consider the best m42 portrait lens ever made, I don't think it's outrageous. It's also not very common so you have to factor in rarity/collector value. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3705
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Did you guys checked bigger versions? I find them quite awesome.
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
laenee
Joined: 31 Jan 2011
Posts: 370
Location: Shanghai
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
laenee wrote:
On Canon Mark 2 @ wide-open Test
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pich900
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1745
Location: The Netherlands/Zwolle
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
pich900 wrote:
This lens really shine on FF, your last portraits shows that perfectly....
_________________
All my lenses are for sale, nikkor, Angenieux, Zeiss etc.....
Regards,
Pascal
-------------------------------------------------------
Nikon D700 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
f1.2
Joined: 12 May 2012
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
f1.2 wrote:
焦內銳利, 散景柔和! 靚嘢來的!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
laenee
Joined: 31 Jan 2011
Posts: 370
Location: Shanghai
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
laenee wrote:
A very nice day ! @ Shanghai Fuxing (French) Park Downtown
On Canon 5d Mark ii , totally @f2
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
f1.2
Joined: 12 May 2012
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
f1.2 wrote:
I prefer this shoot !!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ChromaticAberration
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 819
Location: Portugal
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
ChromaticAberration wrote:
Nie set but you abused wide or neaw-wide open apertures, most of the times you don't need it that much and you would get sharper results by going to an f/4 or 5.6 or even 8 depending on subject-background distance.
_________________
Body: Fujifilm X-E1
Landscapes: Samyang 12mm f/2 NCS CS
Macro: Vivitar Series 1 105mm Æ’/2.5
Portrait: Helios-44 58mm Æ’/2.0
Low-light: SMC Takumar 50mm Æ’/1.4
_________________
Marketplace feedback
_________________
a pнoтograpн ιѕ neιтнer тaĸen or ѕeιzed вy ғorce. ιт oғғerѕ ιтѕelғ υp. ιт ιѕ тнe pнoтo тнaт тaĸeѕ yoυ. one мυѕт noт тaĸe pнoтoѕ.†– нenrι carтιer-вreѕѕon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
| ChromaticAberration wrote: |
| Nie set but you abused wide or neaw-wide open apertures, most of the times you don't need it that much and you would get sharper results by going to an f/4 or 5.6 or even 8 depending on subject-background distance. |
+1
I don't understand wide open shooting in many situations.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3705
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
No, no, no. This usage is perfect! Just keep it wide-open, great series.
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
