Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

lenses you wish you had kept.
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 7:02 pm    Post subject: lenses you wish you had kept. Reply with quote

I have been missing two lenses that I sold and wish I never had, the first being a lowly tonika RMC 28mm 2.8 and the second a well used super tak 55mm 1.8.

I always find myself looking for more of them at the markets here, I'm sure there are many times you can think back of the ones that got away!!


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 7:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the Tokina AT-X 90/2.5 macro is the one I regret most.


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can't honestly think of one. There was the Fujinon-TV 1.8/75 I sold for a tenfold profit, but then I found another one.


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I once sold an OM-1 with a standard 50mm 1.8. Before posting I took the lens off to double check the mirror was clean and mirror foam was OK. It wasn't until my friend asked a week later if his 50mm 1.4 had been cleaned that I realised what I had done. I did wonder why I had a 50mm 1.8 sitting on my desk. Embarassed

The only lens I regret selling was one of my first Canon zooms, the Canon EF II USM 28-105 mm f/3.5-4.5. I use to have great fun with this lens and it never let me down. I sold it for pittance too.


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There was a time when i did not have any Konica stuff, and there was no NEX with cool adapters.... but i had this one lens, the 3.2/135, brandnew, never used. It was some old stock left-over from a photography shop.
I sold it because i couldn't use it. Today i have several Konica cams, many lenses, a NEX with AR adapter.... but no 3.2/135....


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nope, just have some I want to sell, and a very few I wish I had't bought.


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Canon FD 85mm f1.8.
Let it go along with my other Canon FD's, but this is the one I miss the most.
OH


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

An old Tokina 28mm f/2.8 rmcII. I gave it to a guy with a camera I sold.
This thing had a coating problem or something, because the pictures had a wonderful character, very vintage colors with a yellow/green hue. The more I see pictures taken with this lens, the more I want it back, but it's now gone. I tried a few other Tokinas 28mm but never had the same effect. Crying or Very sad

I used it for only one single day.









PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I kind of regret selling my SMC Takumar 50 1.4 ! The build quality was amazing but the truth is I rarely used it !!


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Micro Nikkor 200mm f4 and Biotar 70mm f1.6 lens optical block.


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 9:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Many years ago I had a Canon A1, 50 / 1.4, 28 / 2, 80-200 / 4 and all the accessories like flash and motor drive in a nice Canon real leather case, I bought it from a friend at a good price, and virtually unused. I used it for about 2 years then decided to move to the EOS system and traded everything in a straight swop for a EOS 600 and crappy kit lens. Rolling Eyes I didn't regret it at the time, but looking back......... Crying or Very sad

EDIT, I just looked closely at the list of the gear I had written down in the cover of my copy of 'Lens work' for insurance purposes, with the prices as advertised. There's a date 1991 which is probably shortly before I traded it, and the only things on the list I kept were the AE1P, the 500 mirror and the Gitzo, everything else was traded.



check your serial numbers guys, I want my stuff back !


Last edited by Lloydy on Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:14 pm; edited 2 times in total


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SMC Pentax 50/1.4. Great glass. It came with my ME-Super when I bought it new back in the day. Let it go for next to nothing. I could just kick myself.


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Memory as a tendency to forget....

But from memory, there was an almost complete photosniper Tair 3PhS that i miss...
It was quite a lens....

A 15 blades Pentacon GDR 2,8/135mm #8484228 that i also miss....wasen't an exceptional lens but i really liked using it...

A Hoya 3.5/25-42 that i like using more than my Tamron SP 24-48.....

@woodrim
PM me what you want to sell....thanks


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting topic!
Hmm... I had many great lenses I sometimes miss. My list of these lenses changes from month to month.
This month it's
- Steinheil Culminar 135/4.5 LTM - I'm missing it's wonderful bokeh for potraits. Also it looks and feels like a gem. I used it only once and regret that I haven't used it more.
- Apo-Rodagon-R 75/4 - I used it for digitalisation if negatives when I found that Rodagon 105/5.6 does give at least >95% of the IQ at 1:1,5. But now I've changed to FF and I need 1:1 not 1:1,5 anymore I guess the Apo-Rodagon-R would be visibly better here as it's made for 1:1 and I would love to try it again.


Last edited by ForenSeil on Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:04 am; edited 3 times in total


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

can't wait for the day that's my problem.

Since I became a member here I bought 60+

have sold 2 or maybe just one.

yikes!


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lloydy wrote:
check your serial numbers guys, I want my stuff back !


Hmm, ok, but there might be a "small" handling charge. Very Happy


PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can't say as I've ever sold a lens and regretted it, but obviously quite a few people here have.....

If they are Japanese lenses, I may be able to find them if some people are interested. For example, I see Super Tak 55mm F1.8 very often here in Tokyo. Nobody here in Japan is really interested in these!!! It includes the Super Tak & the Tak SMC.

I also see the OM 50 F1.4

And MC Rokkor 55mm F1.7 by the bucket load. (etc)


Actually, I converted a Canon FL 58mm F1.2, and regret that a little, now that the FF Sony mirrorless is almost here!!!! Wink


PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 12:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pentax FA35/2. Don't think I've found a lens since with that sort of micro contrast (not getting into Pentax limited)

Pentax A50/1.4 - never got around to using it much

Zm-5a-mc. Beast of a lens, couldn't mount on my K20d due to the extended flash housing, never got to see it shine. Got a zm-5ca recently but came misaligned.

Zenitar-16

Kiron 105/2.8


PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 2:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Meyer Trioplan 2.8/100 - Now they are expensive!


PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 3:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

calvin83 wrote:
Meyer Trioplan 2.8/100 - Now they are expensive!

Same with one of my Cyclop 85/1.5 - I sold it for ~70€
A few months later I sold my other one for 260€
IQ- and build wise my first one was better (sharper, slightly contrastier and smoother focus)

Some vintage "toy" lenses are quite exensive these days. I wonder which is hyped next.
Maybe Mir 65/3.5 (Trioplan like bokeh)?

PS:
I often also often regret that I sold the Contax G Carl Zeiss Planar 35/2.
It's very compact (even more compact than Biogon 35/2), sharp wide open (not as sharp as Biogon 35/2 though) and very sharp stopped down with best T* colors. Bokeh was sometimes good-very good but often poor, especially wide open, which was one of the main reasons for me to sell it. But I regret that quite often, as very good and fast 35mm vintage lenses are hard to find.


iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Can't honestly think of one...

Well... I guess you haven't sold many of the lenses you did like? Shocked
How many lenses do you keep?

My only keeper is my first Helios 44-2 due good IQ and imho too low reselling price.


PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 8:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

uhoh7 wrote:
can't wait for the day that's my problem.

Since I became a member here I bought 60+

have sold 2 or maybe just one.

yikes!


I started feeling bad having too many lenses stored away and not using them so I went on a mad selling spree and went a bit too far with the 2 lenses I mentioned.


PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 9:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What a depressive thread! like the dark, the cold and rainy is not enough for this autumn...

Keep them all.


PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 10:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The one I regret to have sold the most is the Nikkor-O 2.0/35. Definitely.
And perhaps the Vivitar 3.5/17.

And I really regret NOT to have bought a fully working Leica M3 with a collapsible Summicron 2/50 which was offered to me for €300,-!!
Damn! Silly me!


PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LucisPictor wrote:
And I really regret NOT to have bought a fully working Leica M3 with a collapsible Summicron 2/50 which was offered to me for €300,-!!
Damn! Silly me!


Sounds like a good title for a different thread, the ones you have regretted not buying!!


PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Over the 20-odd years I've been messing with cameras there have been a few that I've missed.

1. Zeiss 18/4 Distagon in Contax MM. I loved the character of that lens but sold it about 18 moths ago to fund something non-photographic, then regretted it immediately and ever since. Sadly I've not been able to afford another, however I've acquired Tamron 17/3.5 for £50 which has helped ease the pain, but it's not a patch on the Zeiss.

2. Canon FD 135/2 which I thought was just a great short/mid tele, often combined with a Canon 2x converter. I traded a Sigma 70-210 2.8 APO to get it. And to prove history repeats… I've just chopped in a Canon 70-200/2.8 L IS against a 135/2L

3. Pentax SMC-M 50/1.4. Good? Bad? Can't remember but it was my first fast prime and it impressed at the time. I sometimes consider buying an MX and one of these just to see if I'd still be impressed.

I'd also like to re-buy a Zeiss Planar 85/1.4, but I don't regret that as I like NEX-6 it helped pay for.