| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:10 am Post subject: Agfa Isolette III, Ilford XP2 in Paterson FX-39 1:9 8mins |
 |
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Many thanks to Attila for kindly allowing me to try this camera out before I relayed it to him. It's a good one, not quite as sharp as my Ikonta-M but still very respectable, suffers from flare a bit though.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Pretty good indeed!
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ludoo
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 1397
Location: Milan, Italy
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
ludoo wrote:
Stick to MF analog, it really suits your style. 
_________________
My galleries
Digital: Samsung EX-1
Past Digital: Samsung NX10, Sigma SD9, Sigma SD10, SD14, DP2, Pentax *istD, Kx, Fuji S2 Pro, Canon 5D
Analog: packfilm Polaroids, 6x9 Kodak folders, Pentacon Taxona half-frame, Fujica ST605n, Walz Envoy, Olympus 35 S-II, Olympus Wide S
Past Analog: Polaroid 600se, Polaroid 110B, Canon IIF, various fixed-lens and Russian rangefinders, ...
Past Lenses: Nikkor 24/2.8, Nikkor SC 50/1.4, Nikkor 50/2, Nikkor H 85/1.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5, Nikkor Q 135/3.5, Fujinon 100/2.8, Fujinon EBC 100/2.8, Fujinon EBC 135/3.5, Fujinon EBC 200/4.5, Mamiya SX 135/2.8, CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 zebra, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, ...
altroformato
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Cheers Ludoo, I like to shoot old buildings and other vintage subjects so BW film does fit very well with those subjects.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skida
Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 1826
Location: North East England
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
skida wrote:
I am liking the shots from these vintage cameras. Nicely done on this set. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
#3 would be a beautiful photo if you did not apply that terrible digital texture.
Stay with your negatives, you take good photos, of good subjects, with good camera, you don't need fake beautifiers.
Beauty is already there in the simple pureness of your negatives.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Ian, you should take really crappy pictures, lots of OOF shots directly into the sun, etc. Then Attila
won't want it and you have a free camera!   Next time, OK? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Thanks for the tips and kind words guys.
Bill, shh, I'm just waiting till I have to relay something special to try that tactic!
Orio, here is the untouched scan of #3:
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
I still see the artifacts in the sky.  Then I guess it's a problem with the negative.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Yes, not sure what happened, sadly.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
| Yes, not sure what happened, sadly. |
I had similar ugly artifact with Efke film, film was fresh new. May developing time was wrong really no clue. With same camera later on other film I made brilliant shoot.
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
