Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Expired Superpan 200 dev. in cold Rodinal
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:48 pm    Post subject: Expired Superpan 200 dev. in cold Rodinal Reply with quote

This panchromatic (originally made for aerial and technical photography) 35mm film is expired 6 months ago, developed 14min in 17°C cold 1:50 Rodinal

The dynamik range especially in dark areas is definately a lot lower than usual because the film was developed ~4-5min to short or lower ISO should have been used to reach optimum results. Negs were very thin.
Digitaltruth says 17min @ 20°C in 1:50 rodinal - and I got a lot more ugly results with these times than in these examples. I think there a lot space for improvement!
The last ~5 times I developed this film (with the digitaltruth times) I got grainy results without any good whites or blacks while the first time I was using the film I got perfectly clear results (with times from a another forum, can't remember them).
First I thought that it was caused by expiration (my first roll was not expired) or of slightly different developer (I used Parodinal), but now with this Roll I think that this film is very sensitive to high temperatures and it's better to develope the film a little colder than usual. But maybe my old analog development-thermometer is crap Question


A buddy tries my NEX Smile


(he tried to shoot some geese)




Some other friends playing with my NEX Smile Here you can see the bad blacks because of the under-development






Some urban exploration on the way home (here a little gamma boost was applied)


My friend is a Telekom guy and looks if this telephone box may still work Very Happy


lol conclusion was that it still might work when a analog phone would be attached


(bark of a tree, contrast reminds me slightly of Rollei Retro 80s)

Lens used was mostly Contax G Planar T* 45/2 except three of the "urban exploration" shots which were made Contax G Biogon T* 28/2.8 wide open, all on Contax G1 Body
Scanner is Epson V500, @2400dpi, grain reduction turned off, standard sharpening on, no PP except the one pic with the gamma boost.


Last edited by ForenSeil on Mon Mar 26, 2012 4:38 pm; edited 12 times in total


PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice series. I like the shots of your buddy with your Nex the best. Tree bark is always good and a good test for how a film shows detail and contrast, too.


PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I see very good results already.