View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
TijmenDal
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Posts: 206
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:15 pm Post subject: Optical difference between German and Japanese Contax lenses |
|
|
TijmenDal wrote:
So I was reading this article and was wondering how much difference there is between Japanese and German made Contax lenses. Seeing as there are two versions, MM and AE, and some of them are made in Japan and others in Germany, I was wondering which ones are better. Also, would anyone have a list of different serial numbers? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Orio have a few from both he say they have no difference. These lenses are top of the line I doubt anybody can make better lenses with significant differences. Take any of them and enjoy!
I have Japanese 180mm and 135mm, 35mm 1.4,85mm 1.4, 85mm f2.8 , 50mm f1.4 all German, I sold 200mm was German too , all are stunning. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TijmenDal
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Posts: 206
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TijmenDal wrote:
Ok thanks, I'm asking because I'd like to pick one up. Probably going for the Distagon 35mm f/2.8, seeing how I'm considering swapping the 40D for a 5Dc and the 28mm isn't really mountable on a 5D.
Also looking into getting the 135mm f/2.8 Sonnar. Is there a big difference with the CZJ 135mm f/3.5 I have now? Haven't had too much luck finding side-by-side comparisons online. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
Between lenses produced in both Germany and Japan I never have seen any real difference in terms of optical quality.
The German lenses tend to cost more now in the used market and that is a real value since people will in fact to continue to pay a premium.
The Lens you mention ... Distagon 2.8/35 was only ever a Japan lens as far as I know.
One thing you will find with the later MM lenses is they have a different aperture shape.
The glass and Coatings are perform remarkably uniform from the first run of lenses to the last.
Maybe the last had a bit more sharpness and maybe the first had a bit smoother bokeh.
IQ in general would be difficult to tell apart if you did not know you were looking at different lenses output. _________________ Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
I have used both the AE and MM versions of the Distagon 28/2.8 on my 5D with no problem, just make sure you have a decent quality adapter. I noticed that the MM version was sharper in the corners at larger apertures. _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Another question would be: How big is the difference between Carl Zeiss and Carl Zeiss Jena?
(For everyone who don't know the difference - Carl Zeiss was splittet after WWII into Carl Zeiss (in West-Germany) and "Carl Zeiss Jena" (G.D.R./East-Germany))
Rollei-factories in Singapur made also Carl Zeiss lenses, right? How do they differ drom each other? _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Depend by lens, in general western made Contax lenses are better a lot than Jena made ones , but some Jena made ones good as than western made or even better. Biotar 75mm f1.5 , Pancolar 80mm f1.8 they are better than western made lenses in my opinion. Several others are close, 180mm, 200mm, 135mm, Sonnars , 55mm f1.4, 50mm f1.8 Pancolars , Biotar 50mm f2 etc
In general western lenses has better coating, better contrast , and way better built quality. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
I confirm that in my experience there is no difference in build quality between German and Japanese lenses in the Contax SLR line. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TijmenDal
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Posts: 206
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
TijmenDal wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
I have used both the AE and MM versions of the Distagon 28/2.8 on my 5D with no problem, just make sure you have a decent quality adapter. I noticed that the MM version was sharper in the corners at larger apertures. |
Ok thanks! Good to know! What would you consider a quality adapter? So far I've only gotten the cheapest adapters yet fro Canon EF mount (M42, OM, F and T2). Except for the OM mount adapter, they're all really snug and fit well. Could you maybe point me in the right direction for a good C/Y->EF adapter? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
I noticed that the MM version was sharper in the corners at larger apertures. |
Let me point out that this depends on the MM, not on the country.
Some MM lenses, amongst them the 2.8/28, have been optically improved when the production switched from AE to MM. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
The problem with adapters is that they are only available for a short period before disappearing and being replaced with a new model. My best adapters are black in colour and look a bit like these:
Click here to see on Ebay _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
What I've heard is that there are only three Contax lenses that have been confirmed by Zeiss to have received optical improvements in their MM versions, namely the 25/2.8, 28/2.8 and 135/2.8. I've heard from different users that the wide open corner performance of the 28/2.8 MM is better than that of the AE. Don't remember any testimonies about the 25 or 135.
My Distagon 28/2.8 works without problems on my 5D with 3 different adapters (cheap and more expensive). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
AhamB wrote: |
What I've heard is that there are only three Contax lenses that have been confirmed by Zeiss to have received optical improvements in their MM versions, namely the 25/2.8, 28/2.8 and 135/2.8. I've heard from different users that the wide open corner performance of the 28/2.8 MM is better than that of the AE. Don't remember any testimonies about the 25 or 135.
My Distagon 28/2.8 works without problems on my 5D with 3 different adapters (cheap and more expensive). |
Yes, those are the only three lenses that have been confirmed by Zeiss.
There are rumours on others, but I find most of them unfounded.
I have found, however, a couple of other lenses that show a definite improvement at some point in their history.
The most striking is the 1.7/50 Planar. The versions with serial number beginning with 8 are visibly sharper than the
versions with serials 5x, 6x and 7x
I have had a copy of all of them, and I currently have two copies of 8x, so I am pretty sure of what I am saying.
Note that this change does not coincide with the switch to MM, which was considerably earlier (somewhere around SN 69x) _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 575 Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:01 pm Post subject: Rollei zeiss singapore for Alpa |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
The auto-alpa-color (=Distagon?) 35mm 2,8 and the auto-alpa-color (=tele tessar?) 135mm f4 are marked "made in singapore", no text referring to zeiss or rollei. Five digit serial no. starting with 25.
p. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TijmenDal
Joined: 22 Sep 2011 Posts: 206
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TijmenDal wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
The problem with adapters is that they are only available for a short period before disappearing and being replaced with a new model. My best adapters are black in colour and look a bit like these:
Click here to see on Ebay |
50 bucks for an adapter?! Wooow! I've bought my adapters from 3 to 15$ and I thought 15$ was quite a lot... I'll probably just pick up a cheap adapter first. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cambug
Joined: 06 Jun 2010 Posts: 91
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cambug wrote:
ForenSeil wrote: |
Another question would be: How big is the difference between Carl Zeiss and Carl Zeiss Jena?
(For everyone who don't know the difference - Carl Zeiss was splittet after WWII into Carl Zeiss (in West-Germany) and "Carl Zeiss Jena" (G.D.R./East-Germany))
Rollei-factories in Singapur made also Carl Zeiss lenses, right? How do they differ drom each other? |
Never heard of any lens made in Singapore designated with "Carl Zeiss" marking, would like to hear more. I suppose the factory in Singapore that made lenses in the 1970's was owned by Rollei and lenses designed by Carl Zeiss with trademarks like Planar, Sonnar. Tessar were also used and made by them. So far as I have seen, for those QBM mount lenses made in Germany by Carl Zeiss were marked " Carl Zeiss ", those made by Rollei marked by "Made by Rollei", either in Germany or Singapore, even the lens carries the same trademark name of Planar, Sonnar or Tessar... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
I confirm that Singapore Rollei lenses are not branded Carl Zeiss.
Rollei lenses that are branded Carl Zeiss and marked "Made in West Germany" have been produced by Zeiss in Oberkochen.
Rollei lenses that are marked "Made in West Germany" but branded Rollei have been made by Rollei in Rollei facility in Braunschweig.
Rollei Singapore lenses are branded Rollei and marked "Made in Singapore", and they have been made -at least so I read somewhere on the net - in a Mamiya facility. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|