View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Nikos
Joined: 17 May 2010 Posts: 1077 Location: Greece
Expire: 2015-01-02
|
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 6:04 pm Post subject: To have a classic gem serviced, or not ? |
|
|
Nikos wrote:
I have a Zeiss 2/135 Planar Contax (S/N 5.8XX.XXX).
The seller in the eBay description mentioned a bit of "haze".
When I received the lens, I thought he meant a tiny amount of fungus, which I treat which greek sunshine every now and then.
It only took me 14 months [ ] to notice that one of the elements is indeed quite unclear/hazy
Even with haze and a tiny bit of fungus, this lens captures amazing images.
Zeiss does not service Contax AE lenses any more.
Now, the question is, would you trust someone else to fiddle with the inners of this gem?
They told me about a guy here in Athens who is supposed to be a good technician, but I hesitate.
I have no idea how easy or difficult it is to correctly reassemble the lens after cleaning the elements.
I also wonder what I am missing.
It is difficult to imagine this lens producing even more contrasty photos.
Your suggestions please? _________________ Νίκος • www.diafragma.gr
Cameras: Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Sony α7R, Sony NEX-5N
MF lenses:
SLR:
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4, Zeiss 2.8/21 ZE, Zeiss 2/28 Contax, Zeiss 2/35 ZE, Zeiss 1.4/50 Contax, Zeiss 1.4/85 Contax, Zeiss Makro 2/100 ZE,
Zeiss 2/135 Contax, Zeiss 2.8/135 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 35-70 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 100-300 Contax, Zeiss F-Distagon Rollei, Canon FD 24mm f2, Minolta MD Rokkor 35mm f2.8
Rangefinder:
Zeiss 4.5/21 C Biogon ZM, Zeiss 2/35 Biogon ZM, Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar L39, Leica Tele-Elmarit 2.8/90mm, Zeiss 2/45 Contax G, Zeiss 2.8/90 Contax G, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM
AF lenses: Canon 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, Canon 70-200 f/4 L, Canon 300 f/4 L IS, Canon 100 f/2.8 macro
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I have a pro repair man here he did made awesome job to me several times, he did clean many Contax lens to me successfully and failed on one where is fungus did grow between cemented elements , to clean it was not economical so he left in.
In my opinion if lens produce amazing images keep it with haze and don't clean it. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 6:18 pm Post subject: Re: To have a classic gem serviced, or not ? |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Nikos wrote: |
Your suggestions please? |
Contax must have had a Greek distributor at the time. Contact the distributor, they will probably give you the name of one of their technicians. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nikos
Joined: 17 May 2010 Posts: 1077 Location: Greece
Expire: 2015-01-02
|
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 7:28 pm Post subject: Re: To have a classic gem serviced, or not ? |
|
|
Nikos wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Contax must have had a Greek distributor at the time. Contact the distributor, they will probably give you the name of one of their technicians. |
Good point. I will try to find out.
I remember to have seen a Contax lens in a shop window.
However, Contax never was popular here.
I am sure a lot of people are going to ask me "what is Contax?"... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5041 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:44 pm Post subject: Re: To have a classic gem serviced, or not ? |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Contax must have had a Greek distributor at the time. |
I dont know why this sounds so funny? _________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ZoneV
Joined: 09 Nov 2009 Posts: 1632 Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:48 pm Post subject: Re: To have a classic gem serviced, or not ? |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
Nikos wrote: |
...I have no idea how easy or difficult it is to correctly reassemble the lens after cleaning the elements.
I also wonder what I am missing.
It is difficult to imagine this lens producing even more contrasty photos.
... |
On all the lenses I opend up to now I did not find centring correction screws or something like that.
Furthermore I found that all lens elements have a exact defined place in the lens tube where I can not change it by accident.
I could - and have - sometimes changed the direction of the lens by accident. I most times or every time this is clearly to see in the image.
So from my viewpoint it is not very special lens science knowledge needed to clean lens elements. One needs skills for mechanics. And how to handle lenses, how to clean them.
Now the BUT: I have up to now not opend Zeiss Contax lenses or Leitz/Leica lenses. Probably they have more possibities to adjust things - but I suppose not.
I would reccomend to take that workshop and have the lens cleaned.
When not there is the possible danger that the fungus etches the lens permanent. _________________ Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
AlunH
Joined: 26 Jan 2012 Posts: 23 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AlunH wrote:
Hi Nikos,
Ive heard that fogging can be caused by a number reasons. A thin fungus layer or A film of oil - This can happen when the lens has been subjected to high temperatures and a lubricant has broken down and gassed out. Once vapourised it can come to rest on one of the glass elements and condense once the lens cools down. The same with moisture such as if water has managed to penetrate. Some lenses have two or more elements glued together. The adhesive can go off after time or poor storage.
I would expect that a competant camera technician would be able to clean this up for you, unless there is something complicated in there such as an index matching adhesive which has gone bad. However, there is always the chance that something may snap or sheer during the repair and with no more spares available the chance of getting it back together and working again rest on you or the technician finding a suitable 'donor' lens for the parts.
If it were me, I'd keep an eye out for a beaten up donor lens first and then take it to a tech with a good reputation.
Or even try it myself!
Alun _________________
DSLR: - Canon EOS500D/ 1DS /6D/Canon
SLR: - Canon FTb QL /Pentax Spotmatic ...
Lenses (AF): - EF 20-35mm f2.8L, EF 28-135mm IS USM, EF 50mm f1.8, EF 70-200 f2.8L USM, EF 2x Extender Mk1...
Lenses (MF): - Canon FL 55 /1.2, Carl Zeiss Jenna MC 135mm 3.5, Jupiter 9 85mm f2, Helios 44-2 58mm f2, Helios 44-m 58mm f2, Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 135mm f4, CZJ 35mm f2.4 Flektogon (x2), CZJ Pancolar 1.8/80mm, MTO 1000mm f10, MTO 500mm f8, Pentax SMC Takumar 50mm f1.4, RMC Tokina 17mm f3.5, Tamron SP17 /3.5, Pentacon 135mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nikos
Joined: 17 May 2010 Posts: 1077 Location: Greece
Expire: 2015-01-02
|
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nikos wrote:
Thank you for your input!
I tried to call to the technician, but it was past 17:00 and I only spoke with the answering machine _________________ Νίκος • www.diafragma.gr
Cameras: Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Sony α7R, Sony NEX-5N
MF lenses:
SLR:
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4, Zeiss 2.8/21 ZE, Zeiss 2/28 Contax, Zeiss 2/35 ZE, Zeiss 1.4/50 Contax, Zeiss 1.4/85 Contax, Zeiss Makro 2/100 ZE,
Zeiss 2/135 Contax, Zeiss 2.8/135 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 35-70 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 100-300 Contax, Zeiss F-Distagon Rollei, Canon FD 24mm f2, Minolta MD Rokkor 35mm f2.8
Rangefinder:
Zeiss 4.5/21 C Biogon ZM, Zeiss 2/35 Biogon ZM, Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar L39, Leica Tele-Elmarit 2.8/90mm, Zeiss 2/45 Contax G, Zeiss 2.8/90 Contax G, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM
AF lenses: Canon 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, Canon 70-200 f/4 L, Canon 300 f/4 L IS, Canon 100 f/2.8 macro
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|