View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3704 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:37 am Post subject: How steady your hand is with NEX? |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
I've heard mirrorless do not need image stabilization as much as DSLR. I wonder about longest exposure times that can be achieved shooting from hand with Nex (no blurred images)? 50mm lens? 135mm lens? _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bhargav
Joined: 24 Nov 2011 Posts: 938 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
bhargav wrote:
Regularly shoot at 1/30 on a 50 to 55mm without too much problem if the subject is of course steady. Haven't paid attention for other focal lengths though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
std
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Posts: 1826 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
std wrote:
If i remember correctly with Nex-3 i was using manual lenses on shutter speeds around 1/125 and higher in order to have sharp pics.
When using 'P' and set ISO to Auto the camera doesn't turn ISO up until the speed drops to 1/30 - don't know if this is fixed in later models.
With Nex in the dark you can use image stacking which works quite nice. _________________ Stefan
My lens list:
SLR MD: Rokkor 1,7/50 Exakta: Kilfitt-Makro-Kilar E 3.5/4cm; CZJ 2/50 Pancolar;M42: CZJ 2.8/50 Tessar; Mir-1B 2.8/37; Jupiter-9 2/85 T-mount: Tamron 5.9/200; Tamron 6.9/300; Tamron 7.5/400 C-mount: Cosmicar 1.8/50 Y/S: Sun 3.5/38-90, Sun 4/70-210 RF Contax RF: Jupiter-8 2/50; Contax G:CZ 2,8/21 Biogon T; CZ 2,8/28 Biogon T; CZ 2/35 Planar T; CZ 2/45 Planar T; CZ 2,8/90 Sonnar T |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
Quote: |
I've heard mirrorless do not need image stabilization as much as DSLR |
a dslr, in liveview mode, is a mirrorless
exactly like a full frame is also a crop
I have made a 3 euros loupe that I use for video
I can also use it for liveview photography
I could win a stop in low shutter speed
but I prefer to use the optical viewfinder
isn't my dslr sexy with my loupe
_________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3704 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
std wrote: |
If i remember correctly with Nex-3 i was using manual lenses on shutter speeds around 1/125 and higher in order to have sharp pics. |
This is certainly not good news. 1/30s would be better then my 1/60s with 5D but still not as nice as 1/15s with K10D (true i am also older and had few bottles of vine since then).
poilu wrote: |
Quote: |
I've heard mirrorless do not need image stabilization as much as DSLR |
a dslr, in liveview mode, is a mirrorless... |
I guess it has more to do with short flange distance. _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
bhargav wrote: |
Regularly shoot at 1/30 on a 50 to 55mm without too much problem if the subject is of course steady. Haven't paid attention for other focal lengths though. |
+1 _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
FL and speed law is important.
I can shoot with 1/20 with Samyang 8/3,5. I cannot do it with 50mm lens without lend the cam on my body. _________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Indeed, 1/30s with a 50mm doesn't seem to be a problem.
That has surprised me, to be honest. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hatch
Joined: 19 Feb 2012 Posts: 30 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hatch wrote:
1/13 at 50 mm every time if I've been coffee free for a day
Slower is a question of luck.
Being able to use an EVF instead of relying on a screen is a huge bonus.
But old age is catching up.
I used to scoff at tripod users.
Ah the arrogance when one is young. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Riku
Joined: 23 May 2007 Posts: 1059 Location: Finland
Expire: 2017-04-30
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Riku wrote:
1/60 with a 50mm if I have nothing to lean on. Pentax (with shake reduction) is about two stops better (1/15). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Nex has a shake reduction mode , in this mode camera makes a series of image and save only that where is no movement, if you really need this extreme condition try it, due fine high ISO I really doubt need to use very low speeds. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Riku
Joined: 23 May 2007 Posts: 1059 Location: Finland
Expire: 2017-04-30
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Riku wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Nex has a shake reduction mode , in this mode camera makes a series of image and save only that where is no movement, if you really need this extreme condition try it, due fine high ISO I really doubt need to use very low speeds. |
How do you use it? I tried it and it seems that you can't control ISO in that mode. I tried it inside with the standard 16/2.8 and it fired many shots at ISO6400 and 1/200 Another useless feature... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
std
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Posts: 1826 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
std wrote:
True - it only works in JPEG and on fixed iso which is usually too high to get a decent results.
I think it merges those few high iso shots and reduces the noise a bit.
Riku wrote: |
Attila wrote: |
Nex has a shake reduction mode , in this mode camera makes a series of image and save only that where is no movement, if you really need this extreme condition try it, due fine high ISO I really doubt need to use very low speeds. |
How do you use it? I tried it and it seems that you can't control ISO in that mode. I tried it inside with the standard 16/2.8 and it fired many shots at ISO6400 and 1/200 Another useless feature... |
_________________ Stefan
My lens list:
SLR MD: Rokkor 1,7/50 Exakta: Kilfitt-Makro-Kilar E 3.5/4cm; CZJ 2/50 Pancolar;M42: CZJ 2.8/50 Tessar; Mir-1B 2.8/37; Jupiter-9 2/85 T-mount: Tamron 5.9/200; Tamron 6.9/300; Tamron 7.5/400 C-mount: Cosmicar 1.8/50 Y/S: Sun 3.5/38-90, Sun 4/70-210 RF Contax RF: Jupiter-8 2/50; Contax G:CZ 2,8/21 Biogon T; CZ 2,8/28 Biogon T; CZ 2/35 Planar T; CZ 2/45 Planar T; CZ 2,8/90 Sonnar T |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I used a few times mostly a family snap shoots inside house , it was okay to me. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010 Posts: 1973 Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yinyangbt wrote:
In my experience, the lack of bracing the camera against the forehead as a classic camera (rangefinder or DSRL) reduces the chance to use theoretical advantage of vibration free in a mirrorless . Bracing the camera against the abdomen with the LCD flipped up can help to compensate (in fact this is the way that I use my Nex3) but I don't find much of advantage in terms of going down with the shutter speed.In fact I generally try to keep the Shutter speed at 1/focal length .
I still think that a stabilised sensor would be desirable on these cameras . _________________ Cheers , Teo
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=5778915 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
the great versatility of how to hold a NEX also makes for many stable positions, if on the lap or pressed to the abdomen when using LCD. The EVF of the NEX5N tilted up drops the camera lower so that my upper arms can be pressed against the sides of my chest, makes the camera even more stable than if it was lifted up to eyelevel.
I have been surprised how long shutter speed I can get sharp photos with, with a 50mm down to 1/15 sec, see: http://forum.mflenses.com/pentax-m-f1-7-50mm-wide-open-on-nex5n-t47820.html _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7788 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
kuuan wrote: |
the great versatility of how to hold a NEX also makes for many stable positions, if on the lap or pressed to the abdomen when using LCD. The EVF of the NEX5N tilted up drops the camera lower so that my upper arms can be pressed against the sides of my chest, makes the camera even more stable than if it was lifted up to eyelevel.
I have been surprised how long shutter speed I can get sharp photos with, with a 50mm down to 1/15 sec, see: http://forum.mflenses.com/pentax-m-f1-7-50mm-wide-open-on-nex5n-t47820.html |
This is my experience as well, the whole way of holding and using the camera is easier than the bulk of my Pentax K10 ( still away for repair ! )
I also tension the strap around my neck sometimes, which helps a lot especially if I'm leaning against something as well. The NEX is also so much easier to hold against something like a tree or signpost, or place on a low wall or the top of a rubbish bin.
I rarely leave home without a monopod as well, I have it hanging from my belt so it's no problem to carry around, and that's saved many slow shots.
I've got a much higher hit rate of lower speed shots with the NEX because it's just so much easier. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|