View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BKSPicture
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 426 Location: Sverige
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 10:01 pm Post subject: AGFA Xray film + D76 |
|
|
BKSPicture wrote:
Just got a nice roll of 300ft AGFA Cinerex xray film.
Someone have any experiense with this film?
Have looked up some info and know that its about ISO 50 but not shore of developing times?
Use D76 and would guess a time around 10-12 min, 1+1 water and 20° _________________ Homepage: http://www.bkspicture.com/
(My personal picture etc.)
Blog: http://www.blog.bkspicture.com/
(Lens & camera review, tips and tricks etc.)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I have some Konica-Minolta x-ray film, only had an initial attempt with a piece I cut to fit in my old Kodak 3A.
Result was not good, multiple issues, very soft.
I developed in a tray of Rodinal 1:200 under a red safelight, with my film, the image forms fast, in say 30-45 seconds, doesn't seem to change much with more time in the developer.
Hope your film is better than mine.
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Looks ghostly. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BKSPicture
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 426 Location: Sverige
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BKSPicture wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
I have some Konica-Minolta x-ray film, only had an initial attempt with a piece I cut to fit in my old Kodak 3A.
Result was not good, multiple issues, very soft.
I developed in a tray of Rodinal 1:200 under a red safelight, with my film, the image forms fast, in say 30-45 seconds, doesn't seem to change much with more time in the developer.
Hope your film is better than mine.
|
That image have a nice feel to it
Have read that the AGFA Xray film should be quite good.
Do a test roll and se what happends. _________________ Homepage: http://www.bkspicture.com/
(My personal picture etc.)
Blog: http://www.blog.bkspicture.com/
(Lens & camera review, tips and tricks etc.)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I thought it looked ghostly too.
I'm going to try again with the x-ray film, but I don't have high hopes of producing high quality results with it.
There is a huge thread on the large format forum about the use of x-ray film so no doubt it works, maybe I have either the wrong type or my film is in poor condition (I got it secondhand on ebay).
http://www.largeformatphotography.info/forum/showthread.php?48099-X-ray-Film-example-and-comparison _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4744 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
I've used xray film before, the image is always soft because there are two emulsions, a front and a rear. The larger the film the less soft photos will be. I used some Kodak DF58 periapical film in my 35mm camera and the results were good but probably only suitable for portraits as its soft.
Your church photo looks as if the film has been damaged by light. I suspect the bag has been removed from the box a few times. perhaps films in the middle of the stack will have lower light damage.
Unfortunately I dont have access to unlimited xray films and chemicals any more. I used to enlarge negs on to pantomography film and create transparencies 12inch by 6inch. The detail was great and they looked terrific in transparent holders hung in front of the window. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BKSPicture
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 426 Location: Sverige
|
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BKSPicture wrote:
philslizzy wrote: |
I've used xray film before, the image is always soft because there are two emulsions, a front and a rear. The larger the film the less soft photos will be. I used some Kodak DF58 periapical film in my 35mm camera and the results were good but probably only suitable for portraits as its soft.
Your church photo looks as if the film has been damaged by light. I suspect the bag has been removed from the box a few times. perhaps films in the middle of the stack will have lower light damage.
Unfortunately I dont have access to unlimited xray films and chemicals any more. I used to enlarge negs on to pantomography film and create transparencies 12inch by 6inch. The detail was great and they looked terrific in transparent holders hung in front of the window. |
Don't think the Agfa have two emulsions and this fil gave some nice results.
Have anoter post about post about with a test shot
http://forum.mflenses.com/first-image-with-agfa-x-ray-film-t54331.html _________________ Homepage: http://www.bkspicture.com/
(My personal picture etc.)
Blog: http://www.blog.bkspicture.com/
(Lens & camera review, tips and tricks etc.)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|