View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tikkathree
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Posts: 755 Location: Lovely Suffolk in Great Britain
Expire: 2012-12-28
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:18 am Post subject: Oh no - not poppies - and that ruddy 55mm f/1.2 again! |
|
|
tikkathree wrote:
I think I'm turning into a one-lens kinda guy
I came across these poppies in a wheat field, not whole seas of them just one or two here and there, and all several metres into the crop - so I've had to do some cropping of my own - and it was blowing, oh gusting force 4 so they were dancing about in a most teasing manner.
Anyway, here are some, looking quite surreal.
Oh, and my grandson is staying this week so guess what the next subject's going to be?
_________________ I used to think digital was fun but then I discovered film, then I found old lenses and then, eventually I found rangefinders.
EOS 5DII, loadsalenses
Canon G9 IR conv,
MF: TLR, 645 and folders
35mm: Oly OM Pro bodies 1, 2, 3 and 4; Soviet RF kit |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yebisu
Joined: 13 Feb 2011 Posts: 1299
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yebisu wrote:
Nice. I like the last two best |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChromaticAberration
Joined: 23 Dec 2010 Posts: 819 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChromaticAberration wrote:
Third one is almost spot on composition-wise. _________________ Body: Fujifilm X-E1
Landscapes: Samyang 12mm f/2 NCS CS
Macro: Vivitar Series 1 105mm Æ’/2.5
Portrait: Helios-44 58mm Æ’/2.0
Low-light: SMC Takumar 50mm Æ’/1.4
_________________
Marketplace feedback
_________________
a pнoтograpн ιѕ neιтнer тaĸen or ѕeιzed вy ғorce. ιт oғғerѕ ιтѕelғ υp. ιт ιѕ тнe pнoтo тнaт тaĸeѕ yoυ. one мυѕт noт тaĸe pнoтoѕ.†– нenrι carтιer-вreѕѕon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tikkathree
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Posts: 755 Location: Lovely Suffolk in Great Britain
Expire: 2012-12-28
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tikkathree wrote:
ChromaticAberration wrote: |
Third one is almost spot on composition-wise. |
Is it? Golly! Thanks. I just think, point, adjust and click. _________________ I used to think digital was fun but then I discovered film, then I found old lenses and then, eventually I found rangefinders.
EOS 5DII, loadsalenses
Canon G9 IR conv,
MF: TLR, 645 and folders
35mm: Oly OM Pro bodies 1, 2, 3 and 4; Soviet RF kit |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16663 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Not really that convincing for me to be honest. Lacks contrast (sunshade used?) overall and micro-contrast as well as sharpness. Of all, #2 woudl be it...sorry. _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tikkathree
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Posts: 755 Location: Lovely Suffolk in Great Britain
Expire: 2012-12-28
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tikkathree wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
Not really that convincing for me to be honest. Lacks contrast (sunshade used?) overall and micro-contrast as well as sharpness. Of all, #2 woudl be it...sorry. |
That's fair enough. Fiddly enough conditions and I expected them all to be rejects, as it is I'm gauging opinion so that I can learn something from the experience. I was swaying in the breeze, the camera was swaying in the breeze, the poppy petals were simply joining in. As to contrast - no sunshade used, just a lens hood, and these are the very dry conditions we'vec been experiencing. Not much contrast to get hold of and I decided they weren't worth spending much time on in pp.
This is how the field looks and it'll be a wonder if the poor crop doesn't get ploughed in.
This was the first shot which certainly came out looking very strange!!
_________________ I used to think digital was fun but then I discovered film, then I found old lenses and then, eventually I found rangefinders.
EOS 5DII, loadsalenses
Canon G9 IR conv,
MF: TLR, 645 and folders
35mm: Oly OM Pro bodies 1, 2, 3 and 4; Soviet RF kit |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gurdie
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 997 Location: Finland
Expire: 2013-02-20
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gurdie wrote:
I like the impressionistic feeling and the muted tones. #3 is my favourite. I would crop the treeline from the last pic, probably. _________________ Markku
Give me two hours a day of activity, and I'll take the other twenty-two in dreams.
― Salvador Dali
----------------------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gearsNcogs
Joined: 20 Oct 2010 Posts: 215
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gearsNcogs wrote:
Gurdie wrote: |
I like the impressionistic feeling and the muted tones. |
+1
I personally love #4 the best, and i really like the "first shot" that you posted later (shall i call it #6?). I really like the rendering of this lens. It's much more painterly than most lenses now-a-days. _________________ Stills: SLR: Asahi Pentax Spotmatic SP, DSLR: Canon EOS Rebel XTi, Canon EOS 7D
Cine: 16mm: Krasnogorsk-3 (M42 mount) 8mm: Revere Model 88 Super 8: Bell and Howell 1235 XL Filmosonic
MF Lenses: M42: Meteor 5-1 KMZ 17-69mm 1:1,9 (Cine Only), Asahi Super Takumar 50mm 1:1.4, Focal MC 28mm 1:2.8, Tele-Lentar 135mm 1:2.8, Helios-44 KMZ 58mm 1:2, Helios-44-2 KMZ 58mm 1:2 M39: Industar-26M 50mm 1:2.8 F: Nikon Nikkor 50mm 1:1.8 EF: Lensbaby Composer f2 w/Double Glass Optic, Rokinon 35mm 1:1.4 AS UMC, Rokinon 85mm T1.5 AS IF UMC
AF Lenses: EF-S: Canon EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 II, EF: Tamron AF 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 TELE-MACRO (1:2), Canon EF 50mm 1:1.8 II
Fixed-Focus Lenses: D: Elitar 6.5mm 1:1.9, Wollensak-Revere 13mm 1:2.5 Velostigmat |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
I like the vintage glowy / painterly look to them _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
If they're worth sharing, and they are, they're worth post processing time. I suspect they can be improved with some PP contrast. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011 Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
tikkathree wrote: |
This was the first shot which certainly came out looking very strange!!
|
I like this one! .... _________________ Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DigiChromeEd
Joined: 29 Dec 2009 Posts: 3462 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
DigiChromeEd wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
If they're worth sharing, and they are, they're worth post processing time. I suspect they can be improved with some PP contrast. |
+1 _________________ "I've got a Nikon camera, I like to take a photograph" - Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tikkathree
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Posts: 755 Location: Lovely Suffolk in Great Britain
Expire: 2012-12-28
|
Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2011 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tikkathree wrote:
DigiChromeEd wrote: |
woodrim wrote: |
If they're worth sharing, and they are, they're worth post processing time. I suspect they can be improved with some PP contrast. |
+1 |
Oh you lot, you do badger a chap so! Leave it with me and I'll do what I can, when I can. _________________ I used to think digital was fun but then I discovered film, then I found old lenses and then, eventually I found rangefinders.
EOS 5DII, loadsalenses
Canon G9 IR conv,
MF: TLR, 645 and folders
35mm: Oly OM Pro bodies 1, 2, 3 and 4; Soviet RF kit |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|