View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: London, UK.
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
What is the "FDn" model? Is that the model before the FD L version? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Amazing lens and pics! _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
DSG wrote: |
What is the "FDn" model? Is that the model before the FD L version? |
That's the 'L' version...
the lens is actually here
http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-85-f1-2-l-sn-14883-omar-t37706.html
tf _________________ Flickr.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
well done, both conversion & images _________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: London, UK.
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
Thats the same as mine...My Favorite portrait lens. But why call it an FDn when its an FD L? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: London, UK.
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
Omar wrote: |
DSG wrote: |
Thats the same as mine...My Favorite portrait lens. But why call it an FDn when its an FD L? |
The n is for "new" FD |
But you dont call the older models FD O (O for older) do you?
There is only one FD 85mm f1.2 L. The older versions being the FD 85mm f1.2 AL and the FD 85mm f1.2 S.S.C, which are easily differentiated from the L version, so adding an N prefix and ommitting the L prefix is just making things confusing IMO. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: London, UK.
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
Omar wrote: |
DSG wrote: |
Omar wrote: |
DSG wrote: |
Thats the same as mine...My Favorite portrait lens. But why call it an FDn when its an FD L? |
The n is for "new" FD |
But you dont call the older models FD O (O for older) do you?
There is only one FD 85mm f1.2 L. The older versions being the FD 85mm f1.2 AL and the FD 85mm f1.2 S.S.C, which are easily differentiated from the L version, so adding an N prefix and ommitting the L prefix is just making things confusing IMO. |
Maybe, but I didn't come up with the names or prefixes, canon did. I don't think canon knows what FD means, at least the n for new is known
It's a great lens and that's what matters to me, FD or FDn, I can live with both.
http://www.fdreview.com/lens-review.php?itemid=74 |
Do have definitive evidence that Canon called the 85mm f1.2 L the "FDn" version? That link is written by a private individual, not by Canon itself, so he could be mistaken too.
I have the original box that came with one of my two L versions and there is no "FDn" prefix mentioned anywhere on it, just "FD 85mm f/1.2 L" and "FD 85mm f1.2 L". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
DSG is it worth arguing over a name?may be opening another thread to discuss names etc.
It takes away from Omars photos.A Google search is handy for those in doubt to what the lens is "officially" called.
A beautiful conversion and images from it. _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: London, UK.
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
mo wrote: |
DSG is it worth arguing over a name?may be opening another thread to discuss names etc.
It takes away from Omars photos.A Google search is handy for those in doubt to what the lens is "officially" called.
A beautiful conversion and images from it. |
I agree this may not be the place to do it but I'm a stickler for getting the names for lenses correct. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
Hi All
Just to let you know I split the discussion about the lens "title" to its own thread here.Stan sorry I did not know how to select your post to put it back into the other Topic.Thanks for understanding DSG.
The original post is
HERE _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
DSG wrote: |
Omar wrote: |
DSG wrote: |
Thats the same as mine...My Favorite portrait lens. But why call it an FDn when its an FD L? |
The n is for "new" FD |
But you dont call the older models FD O (O for older) do you?
There is only one FD 85mm f1.2 L. The older versions being the FD 85mm f1.2 AL and the FD 85mm f1.2 S.S.C, which are easily differentiated from the L version, so adding an N prefix and ommitting the L prefix is just making things confusing IMO. |
Speaking about making things confusing: I own the FD 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical. How does that fit into the lenses you mentioned, the FD 85mm f/1.2 AL and the FD 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C.? So my lens is unique unless you omitted the "Aspherical" part? _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
Omar wrote: |
All over the net they call it New FD because a change in how the lens mounts onto the camera. If Canon calls it that? I don't know, will I continue calling it that, yes. |
To make a long story short: yes, Canon calls it the "New FD" mount. Proof (and also watch the "nfd" part in the link below):
http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/camera/lens/nfd/135-800.html _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
DSG wrote: |
Thats the same as mine...My Favorite portrait lens. But why call it an FDn when its an FD L? |
"New FD" is Canon's name for the new style of mount and lens construction that they adopted when they replaced the breech-lock (BL) mount. The BL lenses had the silver ring to lock the lens on the camera mount and always a metal aperture ring; the nFD lenses had some internally rotating part instead of the breech-lock and a button on the lens to unlock it, and a plastic aperture ring (most/all of them?).
The "L" name wasn't used until Canon switched to the nFD style. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_FD_lens_mount#Aspherical_or_.27L.27_lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: London, UK.
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
Spotmatic wrote: |
DSG wrote: |
Omar wrote: |
DSG wrote: |
Thats the same as mine...My Favorite portrait lens. But why call it an FDn when its an FD L? |
The n is for "new" FD |
But you dont call the older models FD O (O for older) do you?
There is only one FD 85mm f1.2 L. The older versions being the FD 85mm f1.2 AL and the FD 85mm f1.2 S.S.C, which are easily differentiated from the L version, so adding an N prefix and ommitting the L prefix is just making things confusing IMO. |
Speaking about making things confusing: I own the FD 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical. How does that fit into the lenses you mentioned, the FD 85mm f/1.2 AL and the FD 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C.? So my lens is unique unless you omitted the "Aspherical" part? |
All three of them have Aspherical elements so the only differentiators we need to know are "L", "AL" and "S.S.C". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: London, UK.
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
AhamB wrote: |
DSG wrote: |
Thats the same as mine...My Favorite portrait lens. But why call it an FDn when its an FD L? |
"New FD" is Canon's name for the new style of mount and lens construction that they adopted when they replaced the breech-lock (BL) mount. The BL lenses had the silver ring to lock the lens on the camera mount and always a metal aperture ring; the nFD lenses had some internally rotating part instead of the breech-lock and a button on the lens to unlock it, and a plastic aperture ring (most/all of them?).
The "L" name wasn't used until Canon switched to the nFD style. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_FD_lens_mount#Aspherical_or_.27L.27_lenses |
Exactly, so there is no need to add an n prefix for the L version as it is already easy to differentiate it from two previous two versions, the AL and S.S.C. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: London, UK.
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
Spotmatic wrote: |
Omar wrote: |
All over the net they call it New FD because a change in how the lens mounts onto the camera. If Canon calls it that? I don't know, will I continue calling it that, yes. |
To make a long story short: yes, Canon calls it the "New FD" mount. Proof (and also watch the "nfd" part in the link below):
http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/camera/lens/nfd/135-800.html |
Ok, but note that the word "New" comes before FD which means "FDn" is wrong and "NFD" is correct, though it looks wrong!
I'd agree that for certain Canon FD lenses adding "New" in front of FD is probably a necessary step to differentiate them from older versions but not with the L version of the 85mm f1.2, because its the only FD L version! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
DSG wrote: |
Exactly, so there is no need to add an n prefix for the L version as it is already easy to differentiate it from two previous two versions, the AL and S.S.C. |
There is also only one nFD 85/1.2 (the L), so there is no room for confusion. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
DSG, I think you're missing the point. Perhaps on purpose.
None of the FDn or NFD or nFD designations have ever been used by Canon. They have ALWAYS referred to the New FD mount as the New FD mount. The mount itself is a separate entity from the rest of the lens when it comes to lens designation, thus it is not incorrect to call the "L" version of the 85mm f/1.2 a New FD 85mm f/1.2 L.
Here is a link to Canon's Museum, where the New FD 85mm f/1.2 L is discussed:
http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/camera/lens/nfd/data/50-100/nfd_85_12l.html
Good enough for you?
Of the older breechlock FD models, the 85mm f/1.2 SSC Aspherical is the only one that has the f/1.2 aperture. Unlike the 55mm f/1.2, which was available as an early chrome nose, an SSC, and an SSC Aspherical. Canon also made an 85mm f/1.8 SSC, which did not have an aspherical element.
Adding letters to Canon names has been going on since before the advent of the Internet. Take the Canon FTb and F-1 as examples. The FTb was made in two versions -- generally identified as FTb and FTbn. Canon never called the later model FTbn, but anybody acquainted with that camera knows what is being discussed. With the F-1, the original model was updated in about 1976 and became known as the F-1n. Then when Canon came out with a new F-1, they called it the New F-1. So its designation is generally F-1N. So, we have F-1, F-1n, and F-1N, and those who are familiar with this camera know the differences. Canon has never used these terms to refer to its cameras, but people who use them do.
And so it goes. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|