View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 2441 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 7:45 pm Post subject: Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF ZE ZK |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
Unbelievably, a thorough search did not reveal ZE/ZF/ZK specific topics?
I love this lens. Design and factory tolerances are like Rolls Royce, every aperture useable and the lens has a very versatile dual character: Though the Planar design is designed for medium to infinity detail, the delicate softness at near focusing wide open is perfect for portraits. Everything about this lens breathes QUALITY. Every aperture useable. Focusing experience must be close to switching gear on a Bentley - delicate and precision-driven.
These are all shot at high ISO (4000 to 6400) using a Nikon D3.
f/2 1/80s hand-held
f/2 1/100s hand-held
f/1.4 1/100s hand-held
f/1.4 1/100s hand-held
Last edited by Esox lucius on Fri Feb 04, 2011 11:51 am; edited 8 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aleksanderpolo
Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 684
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aleksanderpolo wrote:
The bokeh is sooooo smooth, surprise to see such a big difference with 50/1.4. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Joosep
Joined: 25 Jan 2010 Posts: 305 Location: Estonia, Tallinn
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joosep wrote:
The 85 1.4 does not exist in ZS.
Quote: |
Camera Mounts: F mount (ZF), EF mount (ZE), K mount (ZK) |
_________________ The future is analogue.
23 cameras, 25 lenses and counting. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hexi
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 1631 Location: France
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hexi wrote:
Looks like an amazing lens ! nice samples .
well there's only some money to save left _________________ Happy owner and user of :
SLR's > Contax Aria - RX
DSLR > Canon 5D
Lenses : C/Y Planar 1.4/50 - Distagon 2.8/35 - Planar 1.4/85
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sonnar85 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 1130 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
aleksanderpolo wrote: |
The bokeh is sooooo smooth, surprise to see such a big difference with 50/1.4. |
Yess there is. Really close to sonnar look.
What about comparison to Nikkor 85/1.4 Ais?
There is half price difference and contrast should be similiar also when would be talk about plasticity of pictures. Suppose that lens aperture blades have same number. _________________ Shoot on analog mainly with
Nikkor glass
then Pentacon6TL for squares
and Fujica GL690 in case of 6x9
Carpe diem! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BRunner
Joined: 29 Jul 2009 Posts: 705 Location: Czech Republic
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BRunner wrote:
Very nice and natural photos... I like this kind of unobtrusive OOF areas rendering. _________________ .: APO-Maniac :. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thePiRaTE!!
Joined: 31 Oct 2008 Posts: 416 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
thePiRaTE!! wrote:
Whether it was originally intended or not, the persistence of under-corrected spherical aberration in Zeiss Planar designs under f2 makes me believe that Zeiss, while demonstrating superior MTF at infinity, was leaving the diffusive contrast, wide open at short distance, as a property of the artist.
The ZK and C/Y both do this. I too take it as a delightful opportunity.
K. _________________ kellysereda.com
Sony A7ii, A900, NEX-5
_______________________
Helios: 1.5/85 40-2.
Meyer-Optik: Trioplan 2.8/100, Oreston 1.8/50.
Minolta: Rokkor-PG 1.2/58.
Porst: 1.2/55 Color Reflex.
Sony: 4-5.6/70-400 G.
Takumar: Super Takumar 3.5/135, Super Takumar 1.4/50, SMC Takumar 3.5/28.
Topcon: Topcor 1.4/58.
Voigtländer: Nokton Classic SC 1.4/35.
Zeiss: Planar T*1.2/85 "60 jahre" C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*3.4/35-70 C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*2.8/16-35 ZA, Distagon T*2/24 ZA.
lenses for sale here |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xjjohnno
Joined: 07 Apr 2009 Posts: 1270 Location: Melbourne Australia
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
xjjohnno wrote:
Yet to use my PK mount one a bit more frequently. Over the last few months I've been buying up on modern ZK mount Zeiss lenses after finding a US seller who is bery reasonably priced. Due to storage limitations at home I've had to sell a few old MF lenses to make space for them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 2441 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
spleenone wrote: |
What about comparison to Nikkor 85/1.4 Ais? There is half price difference and contrast should be similiar also when would be talk about plasticity of pictures. Suppose that lens aperture blades have same number. |
I would be very interested to compare the two, but I don't have the Nikkor 85/1.4 Ai-S.
I paid EUR 515 for a new in box ZF 85/1.4 at Yodobashi in Osaka, the yen was record low at the time and I had a contact who arranged an extra 15% discount for me. I consider that to be very lucky, the lens costs 1099 EUR in Finland.
left Zeiss Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF, right Nikkor 85/1.4 Ai-S
thePiRaTE!! wrote: |
Whether it was originally intended or not, the persistence of under-corrected spherical aberration in Zeiss Planar designs under f2 makes me believe that Zeiss, while demonstrating superior MTF at infinity, was leaving the diffusive contrast, wide open at short distance, as a property of the artist.
The ZK and C/Y both do this. I too take it as a delightful opportunity. |
Kelly, you summarized it much better than I could. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dude163
Joined: 21 Mar 2010 Posts: 726 Location: New Brunswick , Canada
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dude163 wrote:
I love the 1st shot, some great emotion in that one _________________ Stormtrooper white Pentax K-X m42 adapter
Soviets: Helios 44m-6 and 40-1 , Pentacon 50mm f1.8
Taks : ST 28mm f3.5 , ST 35mm f3.5, SMC 50mm f1.4 , ST 55mm f2 , SMC 135 f 3.5 , ST 200 f 4
CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 1954 model
Leica m8u : Rigid cron 50/2 Elmar 90/4 Elmarit 135/2.8 Jupiter8 50/2 Serenar 85/2
my flickr : http://www.flickr.com/photos/riverviewfoto/
Vintage lens blog : http://dude163.blogspot.com/
500px : http://500px.com/roberttwilson |
|
Back to top |
|
|
laenee
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 370 Location: Shanghai
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
laenee wrote:
I like the 1st one shot !
classic style !!!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rbelyell
Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4269 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
i must say that i do not possess tech understanding to differentiate this lens in performance between various mounts and betwixt various versions (mm, non mm etc), but having recently recieved a plain ol' contax mount version with no other lettering than T*, i have to say it is the absolute finest lens i have ever used, which bears out what i have seen on this forum: that in any incarnation the pix i have seen, and now taken, are among the best to my eye. while previously i was enamored of my c/y planar 50/1.4 T*, i dont know if i will ever take the 85 off my 5d again!
btw, these are just lovely shots, esp 1. _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1387 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2011 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
spleenone wrote: |
What about comparison to Nikkor 85/1.4 Ais?
There is half price difference and contrast should be similiar also when would be talk about plasticity of pictures. Suppose that lens aperture blades have same number. |
The Nikkor is sharper, especially wide open and especially at close distances due to its floating CRC design. The Zeiss is sharper stopped down. Also, when stopped down, the Zeiss has stronger contrast than the Nikkor. Bokeh is different between the two lenses, but delightful in both of them. There's no wrong choice here, really. _________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2011 10:37 am Post subject: Re: Carl Zeiss Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF ZE ZK |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Esox lucius wrote: |
Unbelievably, a thorough search did not reveal ZE/ZF/ZK specific topics? |
That's perhaps because of the search function. I have shown several pictures and written several texts on the new Zeiss lenses here.
Here are just a few:
Zeiss Distagon 2/28 and 2/35 on
Canon EF/M
Zeiss Twins (2x Distagon)
Zeiss Distagon 2/35 ZE on Canon EOS 5D - Xmas Market
Zeiss Distagon T* 3.5/18 ZF - a short report
Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/25 ZF - some shots
And especially about the lens you mention here:
First shots with the Zeiss Planar T* 1.4/85 ZE
Some (more) shots with the new Zeiss Planar 1.4/85 ZE...
And finally:
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 1.4/85 ZE - a field report
But I also have this problem often that I do not find a particular post when searching although I know that it was there!
BTW, have a look here... _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 2441 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2011 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
Wow Carsten, thank you for the effort and compiling the links. Lot of good reading to go through! _________________ Vilhelm
Nikon DSLR: D4, D800, Nikon D3, D70
Nikon SLR: Nikon F100, Nikon FM2n
Nikkor MF: 20/2.8 Ai-S, 24/2 Ai-S, 24/2.8 Ai-S, 28/2 Ai-S, 28/2.8 Ai-S, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 Ai-S, 45/2.8 GN, 50/1.2 Ai, 50/1.2 Ai-S, 50/1.4 Ai, 50/1.4 Ai-S, 50/1.8 AI-S "long", 50/1.8 AI-S "short", 55/1.2 Ai, 85/1.4 Ai-S, 85/1.8H, 105/2.5 Ai, 135/2.8Q, 135/3.5 Ai, 180/2.8 Ai-S ED
Nikkor AF/AF-S FX: 14-24/2.8G, 16/2.8D Fisheye, 16-35/4G VR, 17-35/2.8D, 24/1.4G, 24/3.5D PC-E, 24/2.8D, 24-70/2.8G, 28/1.4D, 28/1.8G, 35/1.4G, 35/2D, 50/1.4D, 50/1.4G, 50/1.8G, 60/2.8 Micro, 60/2.8G Micro, 70-200/2.8G VR, 70-200/2.8G VR II, 80-400/4.5-5.6D VR, 85/1.4G, 85/2.8D PC-E Micro, 105/2D DC, 105/2.8G VR Micro, 135/2D DC, 200/2G VR, 200-400/4G VR, 300/2.8G VR, 300/4D ED, 400/2.8G VR, 800/5.6E VR
Nikkor AF/AF-S DX: 10.5/2.8G Fisheye, 12-24/4G, 18-70/3.5-4.5G
Topcor: Auto-Topcor 58/1.4,
Voigtländer SL: 40/2 Ultron, 58/1.4 Nokton, 75/2.5 Color-Heliar, 90/3.5 APO-Lanthar, 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar, 180/4 APO-Lanthar
Zeiss ZF: Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF
M42 SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM
M42: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.4, Tessar 50/2.8 T, Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Biotar 58/2 T, Pentacon 135/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5
Medium format: several Zeiss Super Ikonta 532/16 Opton-Tessar 80mm f/2.8, Zeiss Ikonta 524/16 Opton-Tessar 75mm f/3.5
Leica: R7, M4, Super-Angulon-R 4/21, Elmarit-R 2.8/28, Summicron-R 2/35, Summicron-M 2/35, Summicron-M 2/50, Elmarit-R 2,8/180 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 1130 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2011 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
Esox lucius wrote: |
I would be very interested to compare the two, but I don't have the Nikkor 85/1.4 Ai-S.
I paid EUR 515 for a new in box ZF 85/1.4 at Yodobashi in Osaka, the yen was record low at the time and I had a contact who arranged an extra 15% discount for me. I consider that to be very lucky, the lens costs 1099 EUR in Finland. |
Wow, fantastic deal. You was lucky. Who could resist...
aoleg wrote: |
The Nikkor is sharper, especially wide open and especially at close distances due to its floating CRC design. The Zeiss is sharper stopped down. Also, when stopped down, the Zeiss has stronger contrast than the Nikkor. Bokeh is different between the two lenses, but delightful in both of them. There's no wrong choice here, really. |
I guess that modern coatings makes apparent defference between them.
And that's true about choice which one. There is great quality about those "branded" fast 85's. Actually that focal lenght has all the time special place at FF. _________________ Shoot on analog mainly with
Nikkor glass
then Pentacon6TL for squares
and Fujica GL690 in case of 6x9
Carpe diem! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|