View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
revers
Joined: 13 May 2010 Posts: 574 Location: In the country just north of Toronto Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:03 am Post subject: I just won a lens on eBay. |
|
|
revers wrote:
When I saw it, there was less than an hour to go in the auction, so, I had no opportunity to do much research on it. I got a Tokina 35-105mm f/3.5-4.3 for $24 including shipping. I have not found much on this lens on the net & am wondering if the folk here have any experience with it. _________________ Ron
Olympus OM-D E-M5, 14-42 & 45/1.8.
Panasonic G1, GF1, 14-45, 45-200 & various legacy lenses.
Canon S5, Sony 1.7 Tele-converter & Raynox DCR 150 Macro converter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 749 Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
If it's the same configuration as my 35-105 Vivitar TX, I consider it a darned respectable lens. _________________ In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
revers
Joined: 13 May 2010 Posts: 574 Location: In the country just north of Toronto Canada
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
revers wrote:
casualcollector wrote: |
If it's the same configuration as my 35-105 Vivitar TX, I consider it a darned respectable lens. |
Here is a link to the item:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&hash=item45f7ce5155&item=300510237013&nma=true&pt=Camera_Lenses&rt=nc&si=gcCIZaKNLevfSYR42UBY0rLsHfk%253D _________________ Ron
Olympus OM-D E-M5, 14-42 & 45/1.8.
Panasonic G1, GF1, 14-45, 45-200 & various legacy lenses.
Canon S5, Sony 1.7 Tele-converter & Raynox DCR 150 Macro converter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 749 Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
Different lens than TX. _________________ In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
My experience with these older Tokina RMC lenses is that they are good, solid performers. I think you'll enjoy it. Certainly can't complain about the price. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I had a 24mm prime RMC Tokina and it was awful. I thought these were budget series lenses? _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
I had a 24mm prime RMC Tokina and it was awful. I thought these were budget series lenses? |
Maybe their quality control wasn't as consistent? Maybe your 24mm had been dropped? I have a Vivitar 17mm f/3.5, made by Tokina, same as the Tokina RMC 17mm f/3.5. Not a budget lens. Mine is sharp with great color and contrast. I've also had compact RMC zooms that rendered surprisingly good photos. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cheekygeek
Joined: 05 Aug 2008 Posts: 183
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
cheekygeek wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
I had a 24mm prime RMC Tokina and it was awful. I thought these were budget series lenses? |
Not sure how many lines Tokina had, but the AT-X series was supposed to be the top of the line, I believe (and the one used by Vivitar for Series 1 relabeling in some cases). Correct me if I'm wrong.
_________________ DSLR: Pentax K-3 II, D-BG5 grip, SLR: Pentax SP500, Pentax SP, Pentax SP II, Pentax Spotmatic F, MX, ME-Super, Super Program, pZ-1
Lenses:
Tele-Takumar: 300mm f6.3; 200mm f5.6; Takumar 200mm f3.5; Takumar 135mm f3.5; Macro-Takumar 50mm f4 (1:1)Super Takumars: 24mm f3.5, 55mm f2.0, 135mm f3.5; S-M-C Takumar 35mm f3.5, 50mm Macro f4.0 (1:2), 50mm f1.4, 135mm f2.5 (v2); Pentax SMC K 17mm f4 fisheye; Pentax-A: 50mm f1.4, 35-70mm f4; Pentacon: 50mm f1.8; Spiratone 85mm f1.8 (y/s); Vivitar: 85mm f1.8 preset; Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon Electric 35mm f2,4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Maybe sombody else will chime in here, but I believe the AT-X series came relatively late in Tokina's manual-focus history -- like from the mid-80s forward. Whereas the RMC series were earlier.
Here are some links I found regarding the topic of RMC Tokina lenses that are germane to this discussion, I believe:
http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?topic_id=23&msg_id=000lSO
http://www.fixya.com/support/t20192-quality_tokina_rmc_lenses
And finally a nice blog entry on the subject by one of our own members:
http://lensporn.blogspot.com/2009/12/tokina-rmc-80-200mm-f4-699-from-ebay.html _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
revers
Joined: 13 May 2010 Posts: 574 Location: In the country just north of Toronto Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
revers wrote:
Thanks guys for the replies. I see mixed opinions so I will have to try it out against some of my other lenses when I get it. Should be interesting. _________________ Ron
Olympus OM-D E-M5, 14-42 & 45/1.8.
Panasonic G1, GF1, 14-45, 45-200 & various legacy lenses.
Canon S5, Sony 1.7 Tele-converter & Raynox DCR 150 Macro converter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5083 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
revers wrote: |
Thanks guys for the replies. I see mixed opinions so I will have to try it out against some of my other lenses when I get it. Should be interesting. |
Yes. Looking forward for results.
I have a Tokina AT-X 2.8/35-70. _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|