Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Is it the film?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 6:38 am    Post subject: Is it the film? Reply with quote

I don't quite understand what happened here - is it the film or is it the lens? I shot this in '75 or '76 on a Pentacon Six. I was probably using the 50mm flek but it could have been the 80mm Biometar, both of them coated. I realise it is difficult to look beyond the adorable Ann (or Mike if you are female) but check out the background trees. How did that paint-like effect happen? The neg is marked "Kodak Safety Film" but doesn't have the type on it.

So can anyone tell me how I got this background effect, and if it is the film does anyone know which it would be or - more important - if there is a similar one available today?

The second shot is from the same roll and is more normal, so maybe it is the lens (Flek 50?) being used wide open with a distant background.






This will have been shot with the Biometar wide open, I still remember the moment - I was stunned by the way the light was falling on her towel and had to capture it. I guess I should have realised then that what I really wanted to do was take photos but it took another quarter-century for me to work it out.


PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 7:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

To get that shallow DoF in bright/hazy. If I shot at 1/1000 at f4 it would require a 100 ISO film...


PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting effect, Paul. Have you tried Fomapan 100? Thinking it might be
close.


PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I need to get some of that. It is a leading 1950s film repackaged under another company, isn't it?


PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

technical pan or panatomic-x?


PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PaulC wrote:
I need to get some of that. It is a leading 1950s film repackaged under another company, isn't it?


Dunno, Paul, think it's an original, has a vintage look. I love Fomapan 100
and 400 dev'd in HC-110.


PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Definitely not anything as specialist as technical pan, maybe panatomic, it was something I could pick up easily from a camera shop, anyway.


PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Plus X Pan is rated at ISO 125. Did Kodak make Plus-X for medium format? I have some in 35mm that dates back to 1983 and it reads "Kodak Safety Film 5062" on the margin. Has a slight blue cast from being developed in D-76 with Kodak Rapid Fixer.

To me the scene looks normal, like you shot it with a close-to-normal focal length lens set at a moderate aperture. I would expect to see about that level of background blur at f/5.6 or f/8 with a normal lens.


PostPosted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that Foapan 100 is the same as Arista EDU 100. Check out Freesyle's website. I believe that its the Adox CHS film that is 50's film.

BTW, I have one, 35mm, roll of Panatomic X left. Its ASA 32.

Gary