View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
PaulC
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 2318
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 6:38 am Post subject: Is it the film? |
|
|
PaulC wrote:
I don't quite understand what happened here - is it the film or is it the lens? I shot this in '75 or '76 on a Pentacon Six. I was probably using the 50mm flek but it could have been the 80mm Biometar, both of them coated. I realise it is difficult to look beyond the adorable Ann (or Mike if you are female) but check out the background trees. How did that paint-like effect happen? The neg is marked "Kodak Safety Film" but doesn't have the type on it.
So can anyone tell me how I got this background effect, and if it is the film does anyone know which it would be or - more important - if there is a similar one available today?
The second shot is from the same roll and is more normal, so maybe it is the lens (Flek 50?) being used wide open with a distant background.
This will have been shot with the Biometar wide open, I still remember the moment - I was stunned by the way the light was falling on her towel and had to capture it. I guess I should have realised then that what I really wanted to do was take photos but it took another quarter-century for me to work it out. _________________ View or buy my photos at:
http://shutterstock.com/g/paulcowan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulC
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 2318
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
PaulC wrote:
To get that shallow DoF in bright/hazy. If I shot at 1/1000 at f4 it would require a 100 ISO film... _________________ View or buy my photos at:
http://shutterstock.com/g/paulcowan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Interesting effect, Paul. Have you tried Fomapan 100? Thinking it might be
close. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulC
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 2318
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PaulC wrote:
I need to get some of that. It is a leading 1950s film repackaged under another company, isn't it? _________________ View or buy my photos at:
http://shutterstock.com/g/paulcowan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
technical pan or panatomic-x? _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
PaulC wrote: |
I need to get some of that. It is a leading 1950s film repackaged under another company, isn't it? |
Dunno, Paul, think it's an original, has a vintage look. I love Fomapan 100
and 400 dev'd in HC-110. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulC
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 2318
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PaulC wrote:
Definitely not anything as specialist as technical pan, maybe panatomic, it was something I could pick up easily from a camera shop, anyway. _________________ View or buy my photos at:
http://shutterstock.com/g/paulcowan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Plus X Pan is rated at ISO 125. Did Kodak make Plus-X for medium format? I have some in 35mm that dates back to 1983 and it reads "Kodak Safety Film 5062" on the margin. Has a slight blue cast from being developed in D-76 with Kodak Rapid Fixer.
To me the scene looks normal, like you shot it with a close-to-normal focal length lens set at a moderate aperture. I would expect to see about that level of background blur at f/5.6 or f/8 with a normal lens. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gary2881
Joined: 22 May 2010 Posts: 135 Location: Scio, OR
|
Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
gary2881 wrote:
I think that Foapan 100 is the same as Arista EDU 100. Check out Freesyle's website. I believe that its the Adox CHS film that is 50's film.
BTW, I have one, 35mm, roll of Panatomic X left. Its ASA 32.
Gary |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|