View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 4:14 pm Post subject: Komura Koki Tokyo 135mm f:2.8 |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
I have a m42 Komura lens with a short serial No. 5113
This must be pretty old?
I count 20 blades
_________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Looks much different than mine, which is No.3247491. I like the f/2.8 better than the f/3.5. I see you now have both; how do you compare the two? _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
A. Yes its old; its from about 1955-1959 for sure. 1955 may be the earliest date I know of, as I believe its this lens that was listed as a "Coligon" in Seymours Exakta catalog.
B. This sinks my theory that this series of lenses was made by Fujita. They are definitely Komuras, you can't get more definitive evidence than this.
I am referring to the same lens sold as Soligor, Coligon, Peerotar, Spectra, etc. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Sat Oct 16, 2010 11:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Looks much different than mine, which is No.3247491. I like the f/2.8 better than the f/3.5. I see you now have both; how do you compare the two? |
I have a Komura 105mm f/2. The 135mm f/2.8 is a completely different lens, but I see some similarities in how the glass "renders" the pictures.
luisalegria wrote: |
A. Yes its old; its from about 1955-1959 for sure. 1955 may be the earliest date I know of, as I believe its this lens that was listed as a "Coligon" in Seymours Exakta catalog.
B. This sinks my theory that this series of lenses was made by Fujita. They are definitely Komuras, you can't get more definitive evidence than this.
I am referring to the same lens sold as Soligor, Coligon, Peerotar, Spectra, etc. |
Interesting theory and conclusion, thx!
Difficult to answer this, but what can a decent price tag be on a lens like this? _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no
Last edited by Nordentro on Sat Oct 16, 2010 11:54 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
This is still going to be a pretty cheap lens, even with a Komura name and the rarity factor - this is absolutely the earliest Komura I have seen, and the first of this type I have seen sold under its makers name.
The Soligors, etc. of this make regularly sell for @$20
If you advertise it well, maybe $30-40 _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2463 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
A. Yes its old; its from about 1955-1959 for sure. 1955 may be the earliest date I know of, as I believe its this lens that was listed as a "Coligon" in Seymours Exakta catalog.
B. This sinks my theory that this series of lenses was made by Fujita. They are definitely Komuras, you can't get more definitive evidence than this.
I am referring to the same lens sold as Soligor, Coligon, Peerotar, Spectra, etc. |
I don't think this disproves your theory. I think two different manufactorers made similiar lenses.
http://forum.mflenses.com/fujita-the-forgotten-maker-t22482,highlight,juplen.html
This a link to your old thread. I think everyone but one is Fujita made.
The Soligor with the the writing around the rim on the rear row right corner, I believe is Komura made.
If I'm right the serial number dosen't start with the letter Y.
If it does I'm wrong. _________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
20 blades, wow! _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
The other 135/2.8 in that lineup (Peerotar) is precisely the same construction as the Soligor. They are identical internally, I have opened both side-by side. I even switched parts from one to the other - the Peerotar was M42 and the Soligor Exakta, I switched mounts. They fit perfectly.
So the maker must be the same. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
verdurina
Joined: 16 May 2010 Posts: 58 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
verdurina wrote:
i love this lens!! _________________ if you like photography, maybe you should visit my site!
MY FLICKR
Canon EOS 450D / Digital Rebel XSi
M42 lenses: Pentacon 200mm f4 / Helios 44-2 / Helios 44m-4 MC / Helios 44m-7 / Zeiss Aus Jena DDR Tessar / Marep 135mm f3.5/ MC Zenitar 50mm f1.9 / Jupiter 37AM 135mm f3.5/ Mir-1b 37mm f2.8 / |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Nordentro wrote: |
woodrim wrote: |
Looks much different than mine, which is No.3247491. I like the f/2.8 better than the f/3.5. I see you now have both; how do you compare the two? |
I have a Komura 105mm f/2. The 135mm f/2.8 is a completely different lens, but I see some similarities in how the glass "renders" the pictures.
|
I had momentarily confused you with Luis, who has the f/3.5 version. I have both and prefer the f/2.8. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
The other 135/2.8 in that lineup (Peerotar) is precisely the same construction as the Soligor. They are identical internally, I have opened both side-by side. I even switched parts from one to the other - the Peerotar was M42 and the Soligor Exakta, I switched mounts. They fit perfectly.
So the maker must be the same. |
Yes, it looks like my Komura is exactly the same as your Soligor
_________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|