View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 8:40 pm Post subject: Panasonic G1 - Anyone? |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Anyone use this camera for MF lenses? I am serious considering to buy one. I have an Olympus E-510 and I am wondering if I would loose out on not have IS on the body. What's the EVF like to operate under strong lighting and low light conditions. I suspect that the high ISO performance of the Panny camera would beat the E-510.
I have a broad spectrum of MF experiences. Started with Olympus OM-2, then digital E-300, then moved on to E-510. Then for a good while I was shooting with a FF Canon 5D. Also have a Nikon D2H (9 fps) body. The 5D is now gone.
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsmlogger
Joined: 14 Apr 2010 Posts: 178 Location: Athens, Greece
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:49 pm Post subject: Re: Panasonic G1 - Anyone? |
|
|
dsmlogger wrote:
stingOM wrote: |
Anyone use this camera for MF lenses? I am serious considering to buy one. I have an Olympus E-510 and I am wondering if I would loose out on not have IS on the body. What's the EVF like to operate under strong lighting and low light conditions. I suspect that the high ISO performance of the Panny camera would beat the E-510.
I have a broad spectrum of MF experiences. Started with Olympus OM-2, then digital E-300, then moved on to E-510. Then for a good while I was shooting with a FF Canon 5D. Also have a Nikon D2H (9 fps) body. The 5D is now gone.
Thanks. |
I used to have a Panasonic G1 but I got rid of it quickly.
I own an E-510 and I am happy with it.
IS is a big plus for MF lenses, you need it everytime you need to shoot with 1/60s or less, not to mention telephotos that you may need to shoot with 1/200s to get a sharp photo.
As for ISO performance, prepare to be surprised. The G1 is good up to ISO640 but 800 and upwards is pretty mediocre. Especially ISO1600 is really, really... bad.
Oh and don't think that RAW will save you. There is so much noise that you will prefer to shoot JPEG so the camera may apply Noise Reduction.
The E-510 for me is a very decent camera for Hi-ISO shooting, much better than E-520. You can get very good results just by lowering the sharpness to -2 and even disable the Noise filter.
The only good thing about the G1 was that the EVF was very good and large, it surely can't compete a large optical viewfinder but for an EVF, it was excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:56 pm Post subject: Re: Panasonic G1 - Anyone? |
|
|
Attila wrote:
stingOM wrote: |
Anyone use this camera for MF lenses? I am serious considering to buy one. I have an Olympus E-510 and I am wondering if I would loose out on not have IS on the body. What's the EVF like to operate under strong lighting and low light conditions. I suspect that the high ISO performance of the Panny camera would beat the E-510.
I have a broad spectrum of MF experiences. Started with Olympus OM-2, then digital E-300, then moved on to E-510. Then for a good while I was shooting with a FF Canon 5D. Also have a Nikon D2H (9 fps) body. The 5D is now gone.
Thanks. |
Way better MF lens handling than any of your camera. Pretty noisy , like all 4/3 , but focusing really a joy vs any SLR. You can focusing virtually at any aperture yes even F22 no dark screen like on SLR if you have split screen in. It has built in 10x live view magnifier if you are unsure in focus, but I using more an more rare simple focusing is at least same accurate what I could get from Olympus E-1+ Katz-Eye split screen. In last half a year all of my digital images was taken with this camera. I think you will love it. Simple micro 4/3 - 4/3 ring available from Ebay vendor Roxsen and Jinfinance with this adapter you can use all of your 4/3 adapters. Micro 4/3 -EOS adapter also available if you have Rollei etc adapter for Canon. Black LCD is very, very good also. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
http://forum.mflenses.com/panasonic-g1-t20948.html
_________________ Rolf |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Is it easy to get a AF adapter so that I can hold on to my Olympus 14-45mm f3.5-5.6 kit lens? Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
stingOM wrote: |
Is it easy to get a AF adapter so that I can hold on to my Olympus 14-45mm f3.5-5.6 kit lens? Thanks. |
Yes, available but expensive if need to use electronic, over 100 USD. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 7:00 pm Post subject: Help me decide please |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
I finally sourced one for less than €200 body only. Very tempted to go for it now as I have a nice set of FD/FL lenses to go with the camera:
Canon FL 58mm f1.2
Canon FD 50mm f1.8
Vivitar 100mm f2.8 1:1 macro
Canon FD 28mm f2.8
Sigma FD 135mm f2.8 Pantel
But what is holding me back is that I am worried I might regret losing the IS function from my E-510 which I plan to sell with the superb 14-45mm original kit lens
Or may be I should wait a little longer and save up to buy the G10 instead?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I never had IS so I can't say anything than I am fine without IS, if I need help due low light I am using a mono pod or tripod.
I had Nikon D50, Olympus E-300, E-1 and for one afternoon an E-500 this camera is better than any of above list. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Thanks Attila.
This is what I can do with IS - all handheld :
E-510 with Tamron 500mm f8 CAT, ISO 400, 1/160s
E-510 with Tokina 400mm f5.6, ISO 400, 1/40s |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Monopod what I said, if no IS. Cheaper than a new camera _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|