View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
AussieBob
Joined: 14 Aug 2010 Posts: 49 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 9:31 pm Post subject: Nikon D50 any good? |
|
|
AussieBob wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new here. I currently have a Canon 350d using old Nikkor lenses with adapters & it works great. By chance I recently purchased a VERY cheap Nikon D50. Has anyone used one of these & what do they think of them? I haven't had a chance to give it a good try yet but early indications are very positive. I love the focus confirmation light. I can live without metering which the Canon gives me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Nikon D50 was my first digital SLR I did love it. Take it without hesitation it works with AI and AIS lenses. With non-AI lenses you can't change aperture if lens is already mounted, need to disconnect first set aperture ring and mount again. This is only the negative what I know. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
And good for Infrared photography. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
And good for Infrared photography. |
No IR filter in ? _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
It has an IR filter but it's quite a weak one. There's only 3 stops of light loss so you can hand hold. Screw an IR filter to the lens and use a hotshoe view finder and you're away. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gaeger
Joined: 16 Jan 2010 Posts: 722 Location: Brier, Wash.
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
gaeger wrote:
The D50 is a great camera! Very light and the ability to use the old Nikkors is a huge plus. _________________ "Here's to the wonder" -- Alan Boyle
Nikkor/Nikon 20, 24, 28, 35, 50, 55, 85, 105, 135, 180, 200, 300, 10-20, 18-35, 18-55, 28-50, 28-70, 24-85, 35-200, 50-300, 75-150, 80-200, 70-210, 70-300, 200-500
Minolta Rokkor 24, 28, 35, 45, 50, 58, 100, 135, 50-135, 300
My most interesting images | Full photostream
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
This camera also has a surprising good / low noise characteristics at high ISO! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
It has an IR filter but it's quite a weak one. There's only 3 stops of light loss so you can hand hold. Screw an IR filter to the lens and use a hotshoe view finder and you're away. |
This is an excellent news! Thanks! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
AussieBob
Joined: 14 Aug 2010 Posts: 49 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
AussieBob wrote:
Well after using this camera for a couple of months, I find that the ergonomics are great & it seems to be well suited to using old lenses & shooting in manual mode. I dont even miss the lightmeter. I have been using the "sunny 16" rule & have had almost perfect exposures first go with just about every shot. Sadly, I have not used my 350d since. I just really enjoy this camera so much more. I found that with the 350d, the auto exposure was not always correct anyway so I figure no great loss. The big difference is that all my shots are in perfect focus now due to the built in rangefinder which works with every lens I own from 20mm to 300mm. My eyesight is not the greatest & the focus confirmation is a godsend. I took some night shots with a 30 second exposre at ISO 200 & the results were unbelievable. Almost no noise & not noticable at all on 12x16" prints hanging on my wall |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
hey AussieBob...you have to post a few here for us to see _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sevo
Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 1189 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2012-12-03
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sevo wrote:
Quite probably the best 6MP Nikon - better than the original D2 in image quality. Being the last it got the least noisy and highest dynamics sensor...
For MF lenses, it is noteworthy that while it can attach anything AI and up (and has a focus motor so that it will will focus every AF lens except for the two or three for the F3AF), it has no tab coupling and will only meter with chipped lenses. But "shoot by histogram" works fine in less dynamic situations, and so would a handheld meter. If you are shooting sports or children, a D70 might be more reasonable - one sensor generation older, but metering with all AI lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gaeger
Joined: 16 Jan 2010 Posts: 722 Location: Brier, Wash.
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2010 5:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
gaeger wrote:
AussieBob wrote: |
I took some night shots with a 30 second exposre at ISO 200 & the results were unbelievable. Almost no noise & not noticable at all on 12x16" prints hanging on my wall |
I know! I find that the D50 has better noise at long night exposure than my D300!
_________________ "Here's to the wonder" -- Alan Boyle
Nikkor/Nikon 20, 24, 28, 35, 50, 55, 85, 105, 135, 180, 200, 300, 10-20, 18-35, 18-55, 28-50, 28-70, 24-85, 35-200, 50-300, 75-150, 80-200, 70-210, 70-300, 200-500
Minolta Rokkor 24, 28, 35, 45, 50, 58, 100, 135, 50-135, 300
My most interesting images | Full photostream
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Nice reoport on D50:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D50/D50A17.HTM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AussieBob
Joined: 14 Aug 2010 Posts: 49 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AussieBob wrote:
Heres an example of a 30 second second exposre with a Nikkor 28mm f3.5 set at around f8. Noise is barely noticable. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Do they not meter old lenses? I'm tempted to pick one up for IR work and to play with the old Nikkors, but if they cannot meter, this is a disadvantage. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sevo
Joined: 22 Aug 2008 Posts: 1189 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2012-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sevo wrote:
With digital you can always waste a shot or two to make the camera its own meter... _________________ Sevo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AussieBob
Joined: 14 Aug 2010 Posts: 49 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 2:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
AussieBob wrote:
This is a shot I took at the same place on a different night (cloudy) with a Canon 350D & 18-55mm kit lens as comparison for noise. Same 30 second exposure time, what do you think?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|