View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:59 pm Post subject: De-centred lenses? |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Often we tend to forget that lenses cannot only be scratched or suffer from fungus infections, they also can have de-centred internal glass elements.
This is a problem that you won't easily see in normal usage, but if it comes to quality crucial pictures it might be disturbing.
There is an easy way to check if your lens is de-centred (and hope it is not, because there is not much to do against it. )
Shoot a frame with a distinct subject in the center that is more than 20m away so that it only covers a small part of the frame, e.g. a tower or a house or something. Use the lens at f8 in order to get maximum sharpness.
Focus as precisely as you can.
Then place this subject in the four corners and shoot again.
You will get five pictures that enable you to compare the sharpness of the subject in each of the cases.
If the subject is in all four corners equally sharp, your lens is well centred. Congratulations.
If you have a slightly de-centred lens, you will realize a slight difference in sharpness - not compared to the centre image, but between the pics with the subject on the left and those with it on the right side.
If you can detect a considerable difference between the left and the right side, your lens is heavily de-centred (which is rare).
I tested three of my lenses (all excellent ones) today at lunch time.
My Nikkor-S.C 1.2/55 is perfectly centred! Thank God, because rumour has it that this lens is kind of prone to this problem since it is susceptible to blows from a side, e.g. when badly secured during transport.
My Auto Revuenon 1.4/55 (Tomioka) also is well centred and again it surprised me with its great sharpness!
To my big surprise my SMC Pentax-M 1.7/50, which I always rank as the second best 50mm lens I've got, is slightly de-centred. I have never realised that! Fortunately, it is not too bad, but it is visible in a test like this. The right side of the frame is sharper than the left side.
As soon as I find more time, I'm going to test some more lenses, esp. those I use regularly. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bob955i
Joined: 15 Apr 2007 Posts: 2495
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bob955i wrote:
The rear element of the Flek 4/20 for one has an eccentric adjustment in that you can slacken the retaining ring and the element can then be moved sideways. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
montecarlo
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 1865 Location: Romania
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:28 pm Post subject: SMC Pentax-M 50mm |
|
|
montecarlo wrote:
Hello,
Here, in an old test, results a 2% decentering (is it much ?) for the Pentax 1.7/50 http://www.pbase.com/steephill/image/38540082
Here are other two:
http://www.pbase.com/steephill/image/38540080
and
http://www.pbase.com/steephill/image/38540078 _________________ Canonet QL17 III
Zenit E , Helios-44 58mm f:2.0 , Tair-11A 135mm f:2.8, Jupiter-9 85mm f:2.0,
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35mm f:2.4
Pentax MX, ME Super, Chinon CE4/CM4, Petri MC 28mm f:2, smc Pentax-M 50mm f:1.7, Soligor T 135mm f:2.8
Minolta X500, Tokina 28/2.8, Rokkor 50/1.7, 80-205/4.5
Nikon D90, Nikkor 35/2.0, Nikkor 50/1.8, Sigma 24/2.8, Nikkor 18-105 VR |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Thanks for the links. I don't think 2% is a lot, but surely not every M 1.7/50 will be de-centred like that (or at all). It is rather an issue of each copy and not of a whole lens series, I guess.
There surely is a certain variance in quality. Perhaps with Leica and Zeiss lenses a much smaller one than with other lenses.
But as I have written, I haven't realised that my Pentax lens is de-centred. And I still like it a lot! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bob955i
Joined: 15 Apr 2007 Posts: 2495
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bob955i wrote:
Chances are Carsten that you might not see the results of de-centred elements on a crop DSLR as the sensor wouldn't see the resulting soft corner/s either.
Unless it was really bad.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
and at wide apertures it can easily be disguised as normal OOF
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
@bob995i: Yes, you will more easily see at at a full frame body, but you can see it at a crop-DSLR. My Pentax 1.7/50 produces fine pictures, you would never think it was de-centred, but with this test I recognized a slight difference.
@patrickh: Of course. That's why I suggest to use f8. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Carsten, considering how small is the portion of frame used by a 1.6x crop camera, I'd say that if you can find a visible difference within it, then the decentering issue could be much worse than you think. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Yes, might be. But then, effectively only for full frame cams, not for me with my 350D.
I still have to test it again, since it could also be an effect of an inconstant thickness of the adapter... _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
Yes, might be. But then, effectively only for full frame cams, not for me with my 350D.
I still have to test it again, since it could also be an effect of an inconstant thickness of the adapter... |
Make a test on a film camera.
No adapter factor, and full frame. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Orio wrote: |
LucisPictor wrote: |
Yes, might be. But then, effectively only for full frame cams, not for me with my 350D.
I still have to test it again, since it could also be an effect of an inconstant thickness of the adapter... |
Make a test on a film camera.
No adapter factor, and full frame. |
Yes, I will do when I find the time... _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Today I got another PK-EOS-adapter (as it seems a better one), since with the new adapter, my M 1.7/50 does not show any de-centred images.
It seems that my old adapter causes the problem. Thank God! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|