Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Contarex Planar 2/50 on 5DMkII
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:38 pm    Post subject: Contarex Planar 2/50 on 5DMkII Reply with quote

Please apologize the mundane subjects and the mess of my studio
I wanted to test the C-Rex Planar 2/50 on the 5D Mark II
Of course hand-held in front of camera and of course, there can be no infinity due to register distance.
I think these should be the first C-Rex PLanar 2/50 on full frame DSLR ever posted on the web - unless I missed some.
Pardon my excitement but this is the very first time that I see a Planar lens that is completely immune from CA wide open.
I promise tomorrow I will take some better samples with not so vomiting subjects Laughing
For now, just for the sake of science - all wide open:







I could kill for this detail and bokeh together in one image.

_


PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Congrats!
Looks very nice; no loCA too?Wink


PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

karabud wrote:
Congrats!
Looks very nice; no loCA too?Wink


I don't get the joke Embarassed could you please explain?


PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
karabud wrote:
Congrats!
Looks very nice; no loCA too?Wink


I don't get the joke Embarassed could you please explain?


no. i`m not joking
accidentally i added emoticon.
i`m asking because c/y planar has some loCA at f/1.4-2.8(like all 1.4 lenses i had)
bokeh seems to be beautiful


PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

great planar signature!
I know another perfect planar, the makro-planar 60


PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry, what is loCA?


PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

longitudinal chromatic aberration


PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a 100% crop of the specular highlights in the last image.
I never saw anything like that in any Planar that I have used so far - and I have used quite a lot!
Do not confuse chromatic blotches with CA - the shots were taken at 3200 ISO so they show some coarse chroma noise.
I don't see any CA of any kind in here - and this is the "bitchiest" camera for CA, because it emphazises all of it, due to the zero-gap closely packed sensor cells.
If this is what shows in the 5DMkII, consider that a normal 5D will be double better, and film camera, well, not even to be considered given the background grain noise:



PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 12:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

P.S. Lightroom control for CA are set to 0 and control for defringe is set to off !


PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 12:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cristal clear. No CA at all on my screen.
I like that keyboard.


PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 4:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, how are we going to mount these lenses to Canon body? Smile


PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

@ Sorin: those keyboards are available in several colours and cost nearly nothing. They are made by Kraun you can search for them

ersatz wrote:
So, how are we going to mount these lenses to Canon body? Smile


With an adapter. I don't know if they exist. I talked to a guy in Italy some time ago and he said he could make one. It would be a tricky adapter as it would have to allow government of the spring that commands the aperture of the lens which is accessible from the bottom of the lens. I don't know if there would be much point in having that adapter done since you would be able to focus only to 1 meter or so.
You could instead focus the lens to infinity if you would use a Leica M8/M9 or a Micro 4/3 camera.
But again it would be tricky, with the Leica the problem would be to guess the right focus as the lens would not be rangefinder coupled. With the Micro 4/3, the lens would become equivalent to a 100mm lens using only the very central portion of the glass, so again I don't know if that would be worth it, because by losing the outer part of the lens result you would miss a lot of the character of the lens (not to mention the DOF change as illustrated by poilu in his brilliant thread).
So all in all I think that until a full frrame EVIL camera will be made, the Contarex lenses are still best used on a Contarex film camera.


PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:00 am    Post subject: Re: Contarex Planar 2/50 on 5DMkII Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
I could kill for this detail and bokeh together in one image.


Doesn't look too shabby; I don't see much glow, but also not the kind of biting central sharpness that many modern Zeiss/Contax lenses can have even wide-open. Maybe it's the T* coating that is an important missing element.


PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:34 am    Post subject: Re: Contarex Planar 2/50 on 5DMkII Reply with quote

AhamB wrote:
I don't see much glow, but also not the kind of biting central sharpness that many modern Zeiss/Contax lenses can have even wide-open.


Well, here's a 100% non sharpened crop of a tiny portion of the second image:



If you consider that it's 3200 ISO hand-held at 1/40 shutter time (thus certainly motion blurred), I would say that resolvance is not a problem here Wink