| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 3168
Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spamster
Joined: 04 Oct 2010
Posts: 3
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 7:09 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
spamster wrote:
I've been following the Nex-3 & Nex-5 out of high ISO performance ... very interesting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spamster
Joined: 04 Oct 2010
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spamster wrote:
Very interesting post. I think I'll have to stop by a local camera shop and give the Nex a try. That Leica looks very nice.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pat donnelly
Joined: 19 Jan 2010
Posts: 666
Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 12:11 pm Post subject: Sting OM |
|
|
pat donnelly wrote:
Thanks!
_________________
---------------------------------
EP-1, E-410, E-300, D100, D1,
C-Mt: 25mm 1.9, 75mm 1.4, 75mm 1.3, 75mm 1.9, Ultra wides, one inch sensor, 20+ c-mount zooms
OM 350mm f2.8, Nikkor 180 f2.8, Exa 180 f2.8,
Tamrons: 90mm f2.5, 500mm f8 x3, 135 f2.5, 200 f3.5, 24mm 2.5, 28mm 2.5 x8,
FD 500mm mirror lens |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 17633
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Wow! Great comparison!
The main thing is that almost all those images are usable. That's a fantastic outcome.
The E-P2 would not be my favourite, because it's worst in noise and the µ4/3 sensor is not what I want. 
The NEX looks relly good as far as noise is concerned.
But the X1 is my favourite. The colours with this setting are the way I want them. And noise level are also very low. If it only wasn't so expensive. (Hey, it's a Leica!)
_________________
Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator 
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
I second Carsten's opinion, Leica's colours outclass the others.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fatdeeman
Joined: 13 Jun 2009
Posts: 780
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fatdeeman wrote:
The composite mode is interesting.
I have tried this kind of method with the photoacute software but the results never seem to be as good as in the companies demos.
There is a program called zero noise which apparently does the same thing, haven't tried it though.
For a camera to do this kind or processing in real time is pretty impressive.
_________________
- Dave
www.lensporn.net
www.flickr.com/photos/fatdeeman/
DSLR: Canon EOS 60D, Samsung GX-1S (Pentax *ist DS2)
Mirrorless: Panasonic DMC-G1, Sony NEX-5N
Compact: Canon PowerShot G3
Lenses:
Wide: Tokina RMC 28mm F/2.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 28mm F/2.5, Sun Optical 28mm F/2.5, Super paragon 28mm F/2.8, Sigma filtermatic 24mm F/2.8, Fujinon 35mm F/2.8, Sun Optical 35mm F/2.8
Standard: Industar 50-2, Helios 44-2, Helios 44M, Helios 44M-3, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.4, Pentax-M 50mm F/1.7, Pentax-M 50mm F/2, Ricoh 50mm F/1.7, Chinon 50mm F/1.7
Tele: Pentacon 135mm F/2.8, Pentacon 200mm F/3.5, Optomax 200mm f/3.5, Sun Optical 135mm F/3.5, Soligor 350mm F/5.6
Zoom: Tokina 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 SZ-X270 SD, Sigma Zoom Pi 35-200mm F4-5.6, Sun Optical 28-80mm F/3.5-4.5, Sunagor 80-205mm F/3.8, Tokina RMC 80-200mm F/4, Vivitar 70-150mm F/3.8, Tamron 95-205mm F/6.3, Tamron Adaptall 28-200mm F/3.8-5.6 LD Aspherical, Tokina RMC 70-210mm F/3.5
Mirror: Falcon (Samyang) 800mm F/8, MTO-11CA 1000mm F/10, Tamron Adaptall 2 500mm F/8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pat donnelly
Joined: 19 Jan 2010
Posts: 666
Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 12:02 am Post subject: Technology |
|
|
pat donnelly wrote:
This is presumably all in the software.
Which can be analysed and improved upon. The algorithms will improve for all cameras, over time.
Not much relevant to manual lenses here. I believe the X1 is more expensive than the others?
Pity the results were not the other way around!
_________________
---------------------------------
EP-1, E-410, E-300, D100, D1,
C-Mt: 25mm 1.9, 75mm 1.4, 75mm 1.3, 75mm 1.9, Ultra wides, one inch sensor, 20+ c-mount zooms
OM 350mm f2.8, Nikkor 180 f2.8, Exa 180 f2.8,
Tamrons: 90mm f2.5, 500mm f8 x3, 135 f2.5, 200 f3.5, 24mm 2.5, 28mm 2.5 x8,
FD 500mm mirror lens |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dsmlogger
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 178
Location: Athens, Greece
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dsmlogger wrote:
am I the only one who noticed that E-P2's photos where the brightest and NEX's the darkest (which can hide noise in the darker areas)?
And also that the Olympus produced clearly the best skin tones and more detail on the "Carrier" logo? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
