View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
lauge
Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Posts: 101 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:49 pm Post subject: First (and second) role of HP5 |
|
|
lauge wrote:
This forum has really inspired me to try developing film myself. I remember doing this almost 20 years ago in school so this was both exciting and a trip down memory lane. The first two is Flektogon the other are a 20mm Minolta AF lens wide open as the camera has a broken aperture mechanism.
What are the cause of the white specs on this ^ picture above?
Now I just need a working camera and some more B&W film Plan is to try Rollei Retro 80s and 400s and perhaps a third iso 100 film. _________________ M42:
S-M-C Takumar: 3.5/28 1.4/50 2.8/105
USSR: Industar 61L/Z
CZJ: Flektogon 2.4/35
MD:
Rokkor: 35-70/3.5
Kiron: 2.8/105 Macro
OM:
Zuiko: 50/1.8 75-150/4
Sigma: 24/2.8
Cameras:
Asahi Spotmatic F (looking for a sample with working light meter)
Olympus OM-1
Zeiss Ikon Contaflex IV
NEX 7 Sony A55 Konica Minolta Dynax 5D Minolta Dynax 7 Minolta AF 7000
Last edited by lauge on Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Very nice results! White specks are dust on the negative when scanning.
What was used to develop the HP5+? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lauge
Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Posts: 101 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
lauge wrote:
Thanks ID-11 was used at 24C as it is too hot at the moment to get a steady temperature below that, don't know the difference in result between temperatures. I don't own a scanner so used my DSLR and the Kiron to digitalise them, I have seen dia duplicators on eBay and if one shows up in here or in a store I think I will buy that instead of a scanner. _________________ M42:
S-M-C Takumar: 3.5/28 1.4/50 2.8/105
USSR: Industar 61L/Z
CZJ: Flektogon 2.4/35
MD:
Rokkor: 35-70/3.5
Kiron: 2.8/105 Macro
OM:
Zuiko: 50/1.8 75-150/4
Sigma: 24/2.8
Cameras:
Asahi Spotmatic F (looking for a sample with working light meter)
Olympus OM-1
Zeiss Ikon Contaflex IV
NEX 7 Sony A55 Konica Minolta Dynax 5D Minolta Dynax 7 Minolta AF 7000 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
The specs might also be the result of dirt in the water used for the development and/or washing
(dirt deposits on the film thus preventing the chemical to reach the sensitive surface in that point).
If this is the case, you should use demineralized water for the process
(that is what I have to do also, since the water in my area is very calcareous). _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lauge
Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Posts: 101 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
lauge wrote:
Thanks for the tip, water in my area is also very calcareous so will try demineralized water next time. _________________ M42:
S-M-C Takumar: 3.5/28 1.4/50 2.8/105
USSR: Industar 61L/Z
CZJ: Flektogon 2.4/35
MD:
Rokkor: 35-70/3.5
Kiron: 2.8/105 Macro
OM:
Zuiko: 50/1.8 75-150/4
Sigma: 24/2.8
Cameras:
Asahi Spotmatic F (looking for a sample with working light meter)
Olympus OM-1
Zeiss Ikon Contaflex IV
NEX 7 Sony A55 Konica Minolta Dynax 5D Minolta Dynax 7 Minolta AF 7000 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lauge
Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Posts: 101 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lauge wrote:
Second role turned out a bit more complicated. This was shot with Spotmatic at ISO 200 which seemed to work great, but I had one problem; this showed up on the first half of the film like the edges was exposed to light, have you experienced this? I'm ruling out the camera since it's not consistent and then it's either an accident during developing or a bad film?
(never mind the focus, this was a handheld setup not a scan) _________________ M42:
S-M-C Takumar: 3.5/28 1.4/50 2.8/105
USSR: Industar 61L/Z
CZJ: Flektogon 2.4/35
MD:
Rokkor: 35-70/3.5
Kiron: 2.8/105 Macro
OM:
Zuiko: 50/1.8 75-150/4
Sigma: 24/2.8
Cameras:
Asahi Spotmatic F (looking for a sample with working light meter)
Olympus OM-1
Zeiss Ikon Contaflex IV
NEX 7 Sony A55 Konica Minolta Dynax 5D Minolta Dynax 7 Minolta AF 7000 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Well it sure looks like light leaks, but if you feel confident it isn't the camera, then it has to be something that happened either during the handling of the film as it was being transferred onto the tank reel or the developing process. Don't see how it would have been handling offhand, since it's just on the edges. About the only thing I can think of would possibly be uneven or inconsistent agitation.
You might try posting this query over at apug.org. That site is dedicated to the use of film and film cameras. When I've had questions about strange goings on with my B&W negs, I got accurate and thoughtful answers from the folks there. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex
Joined: 18 Apr 2009 Posts: 561 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex wrote:
Fogging at the edges like this is consistent with light contamination during loading of the reel. One of my changing bags is fairly loose on one of the elasticated sleeves, and when I'm not careful, I can get this result. Light leak in a camera usually runs right across from one edge to the other. You sometimes get a similar edge fogging effect with 120 film that has not been wound tightly enough on to the take-up spool. _________________ Alex |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lauge
Joined: 14 Jun 2008 Posts: 101 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
lauge wrote:
I asked over at apug and two suggested that similar results shows up when loading the film into the camera in too light condition and I remember loading the film outside in very bright sunshine so that might be it. _________________ M42:
S-M-C Takumar: 3.5/28 1.4/50 2.8/105
USSR: Industar 61L/Z
CZJ: Flektogon 2.4/35
MD:
Rokkor: 35-70/3.5
Kiron: 2.8/105 Macro
OM:
Zuiko: 50/1.8 75-150/4
Sigma: 24/2.8
Cameras:
Asahi Spotmatic F (looking for a sample with working light meter)
Olympus OM-1
Zeiss Ikon Contaflex IV
NEX 7 Sony A55 Konica Minolta Dynax 5D Minolta Dynax 7 Minolta AF 7000 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|