View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Nikos
Joined: 17 May 2010 Posts: 1077 Location: Greece
Expire: 2015-01-02
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 8:27 pm Post subject: Carl Zeiss 1,4/85 Planar is here, got a few questions... |
|
|
Nikos wrote:
First of all, isn't it a real beauty?
This is the AE version, made in Germany.
Isn't it a drama that my Contax-to-EOS adapter hasn't arrived yet?
Anyway.
I am new to Contax lenses. What about the lens shade?
If I have understood well, Contax produced some standard shade sizes and one needs an adapter and the proper shade size. Am I correct? What do I need for this lens? And how necessary do you find it?
I also see that the aperture only changes in full stops. Has this changed in the MM versions? It would be nice to have more fine grained control over the aperture.
Come on poilu and you other Zeiss guys, give us some more shots with this animal, while I am drooling over it... _________________ Νίκος • www.diafragma.gr
Cameras: Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Sony α7R, Sony NEX-5N
MF lenses:
SLR:
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4, Zeiss 2.8/21 ZE, Zeiss 2/28 Contax, Zeiss 2/35 ZE, Zeiss 1.4/50 Contax, Zeiss 1.4/85 Contax, Zeiss Makro 2/100 ZE,
Zeiss 2/135 Contax, Zeiss 2.8/135 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 35-70 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 100-300 Contax, Zeiss F-Distagon Rollei, Canon FD 24mm f2, Minolta MD Rokkor 35mm f2.8
Rangefinder:
Zeiss 4.5/21 C Biogon ZM, Zeiss 2/35 Biogon ZM, Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar L39, Leica Tele-Elmarit 2.8/90mm, Zeiss 2/45 Contax G, Zeiss 2.8/90 Contax G, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM
AF lenses: Canon 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, Canon 70-200 f/4 L, Canon 300 f/4 L IS, Canon 100 f/2.8 macro
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nikos
Joined: 17 May 2010 Posts: 1077 Location: Greece
Expire: 2015-01-02
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nikos wrote:
Wow!
#1 and #3 are excellent! _________________ Νίκος • www.diafragma.gr
Cameras: Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Sony α7R, Sony NEX-5N
MF lenses:
SLR:
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4, Zeiss 2.8/21 ZE, Zeiss 2/28 Contax, Zeiss 2/35 ZE, Zeiss 1.4/50 Contax, Zeiss 1.4/85 Contax, Zeiss Makro 2/100 ZE,
Zeiss 2/135 Contax, Zeiss 2.8/135 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 35-70 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 100-300 Contax, Zeiss F-Distagon Rollei, Canon FD 24mm f2, Minolta MD Rokkor 35mm f2.8
Rangefinder:
Zeiss 4.5/21 C Biogon ZM, Zeiss 2/35 Biogon ZM, Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar L39, Leica Tele-Elmarit 2.8/90mm, Zeiss 2/45 Contax G, Zeiss 2.8/90 Contax G, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM
AF lenses: Canon 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, Canon 70-200 f/4 L, Canon 300 f/4 L IS, Canon 100 f/2.8 macro
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
congrats! look in great shape
I don't use lens shade with contax lenses but I got some Chinese ebay generic for other lens
you can set the aperture to any values, the full stop have click, for others put in between
the AE have ninja star bokeh up to 2.8, some say it is not in fashion anymore but I see it sometimes in current film, tell us what you think about
my MM produce blue bloom in high contrast scene (white t-shirt in sun), I think the AE is better _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nikos
Joined: 17 May 2010 Posts: 1077 Location: Greece
Expire: 2015-01-02
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nikos wrote:
poilu, how much do you want to send me your adapter with a courier?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nikos
Joined: 17 May 2010 Posts: 1077 Location: Greece
Expire: 2015-01-02
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nikos wrote:
electricl wrote: |
More from the same girl...and a guy!
|
Mmmmm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009 Posts: 4123 Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
For example
http://www.doerrfoto.de/Produkte/index.html
Pictogram oder Bild
Universal-Sonnenblende aus Metall 67mm
Die Sonnen- oder auch Gegenlichtblende schirmt seitlichen Lichteinfall ab und verringert dadurch Reflexionen. Bei dieser robusten Metall-Sonnenblende kann ein Snap-On Deckel verwendet werden. So kann die Sonnenblende immer am Objektiv bleiben.
Artikel-Nr. : 360267
EAN 4000461045301
Durchmesser 67mm
UVP [€] 19,90
Pictogram oder Bild
Sorry, the link doesn´t work
Search for "Sonnenblende" and then choose 67mm Metall _________________ Rolf
Last edited by Rolf on Mon May 31, 2010 9:08 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
I could send you one but post is quite quick from China
usually between 1 week to 10 days
when have you ordered yours? _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nikos
Joined: 17 May 2010 Posts: 1077 Location: Greece
Expire: 2015-01-02
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 9:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nikos wrote:
poilu wrote: |
I could send you one but post is quite quick from China
usually between 1 week to 10 days
when have you ordered yours? |
Thank you. You are very kind.
It was posted on 20/5 from HK, a few days before the lens.
However, the lens was shipped through EMS (= 3Euros for the customs, not 80 like UPS charged me last time...) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nikos
Joined: 17 May 2010 Posts: 1077 Location: Greece
Expire: 2015-01-02
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nikos wrote:
Rolf wrote: |
For example
Sorry, the link doesn´t work
Search for "Sonnenblende" and then choose 67mm Metall |
Danke schön!
"...kann ein Snap-On Deckel verwendet werden"
Ein Deckel von welchen Durchmesser? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bleach551
Joined: 18 May 2010 Posts: 88 Location: Meridian, Mississippi
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bleach551 wrote:
Definitely get ND filters. I have a Tiffen .03 (1X), .06(2X), .09(3X). To use f1.4 to f2.0 on the lens, I have to combine the Tiffen .09(3x) and .06(2X) ND filters to bring the light under control, to reduce the light by a factor of 1.5(5X). here are two photos both shot at F2.0 with the Tiffen .09 and .06 Nd filters on the lens:
_________________ Canon 7D, Panasonic GH1(7)
Nikon 50mm f1.4 Ai-s, Nikon 85mm f2 Ai-s, Nikon 105mm f2.5 Ai-s, Kowa 2X Anamorphic lens for Bell and Howell
Last edited by bleach551 on Mon May 31, 2010 9:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Excellent results electricl ! Can someone send me some fullsize samples at f/1.4 and f/2 with this Contax Planar ? _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
electricl wrote: |
karabud wrote: |
Excellent results electricl ! Can someone send me some fullsize samples at f/1.4 and f/2 with this Contax Planar ? |
Thank you! I'll send you some RAW files. I can also go out tomorrow and take some new ones if you want? |
Yes i got some from you - i`m looking for 5d too and with different examples - i think there are some better and some inferior exaples. Btw your is ae or mm ? _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
electricl wrote: |
karabud wrote: |
electricl wrote: |
karabud wrote: |
Excellent results electricl ! Can someone send me some fullsize samples at f/1.4 and f/2 with this Contax Planar ? |
Thank you! I'll send you some RAW files. I can also go out tomorrow and take some new ones if you want? |
Yes i got some from you - i`m looking for 5d too and with different examples - i think there are some better and some inferior exaples. Btw your is ae or mm ? |
Mine is AE. Oh you mean post fullsize pictures here? I was gonna send some RAW files hehe |
Yes raw - if you can please send me more _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nikos
Joined: 17 May 2010 Posts: 1077 Location: Greece
Expire: 2015-01-02
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nikos wrote:
bleach551 wrote: |
Definitely get ND filters. I have a Tiffen .03 (1X), .06(2X), .09(3X). To use f1.4 to f2.0 on the lens, I have to combine the Tiffen .09(3x) and .06(2X) ND filters to bring the light under control, to reduce the light by a factor of 1.5(5X). here are two photos both shot at F2.0 with the Tiffen .09 and .06 Nd filters on the lens:
|
1/8000 sec and ISO50 not enough?
I have a B+W ND somewhere, but it is 77mm. I definitely need some adapter anyway. All my stuff is 77mm. I am especially curious to use the Canon 500D closeup lens with this Planar. Perhaps then I will forget getting the 2/100 MP ZE, just for a while... _________________ Νίκος • www.diafragma.gr
Cameras: Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Sony α7R, Sony NEX-5N
MF lenses:
SLR:
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4, Zeiss 2.8/21 ZE, Zeiss 2/28 Contax, Zeiss 2/35 ZE, Zeiss 1.4/50 Contax, Zeiss 1.4/85 Contax, Zeiss Makro 2/100 ZE,
Zeiss 2/135 Contax, Zeiss 2.8/135 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 35-70 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 100-300 Contax, Zeiss F-Distagon Rollei, Canon FD 24mm f2, Minolta MD Rokkor 35mm f2.8
Rangefinder:
Zeiss 4.5/21 C Biogon ZM, Zeiss 2/35 Biogon ZM, Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar L39, Leica Tele-Elmarit 2.8/90mm, Zeiss 2/45 Contax G, Zeiss 2.8/90 Contax G, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM
AF lenses: Canon 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, Canon 70-200 f/4 L, Canon 300 f/4 L IS, Canon 100 f/2.8 macro
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
# 15
# 16
# 17
# 09
# 12
# 13+14
# 19
# 20
The above were all taken with an AEG version of the lens, on a 5D or 5DII camera (can't remember by heart)
The Contax lens shades are very good quality, but less expensive metal shades are available on Ebay, that do a good job.
The aperture ring still opens in full steps also in the MM version of the lens.
- _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bleach551
Joined: 18 May 2010 Posts: 88 Location: Meridian, Mississippi
|
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 11:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bleach551 wrote:
nkanellopoulos,
I guess you could select a shutter speed of 1/8000 and an iso of 50, I thought the lowest the 5dmkII and the 7D would go was ISO 100, but , i don't believe you will be able to control exposure in every situation with just the shutter speed and with the lSO setting or the get the"best" results by doing it that way, correct me if I am wrong. All you have to do about the 77mm ND or any other 77mm filters you have is to buy a 77mm to 67mm, 67mm being the filter thread size of the Planar 85mm f1.4, step-down ring to use your 77mm filters on a 67mm filter thread. I have Contax lenses that have a 55mm filter thread and all I needed to do was buy a 67mm to 55mm step-down ring, $9.87, to use the 67mm filters from my Planar 85mm f1.4. But I knew in advance that the lens with the biggest filter thread size I would buy would be the Planar 85mm f1.4, which is 67mm. With any future lens I buy, I will just buy a step-down ring for the filter thread of the new lenses, trying to keep as similiar a filter thread size as possible amongst them. _________________ Canon 7D, Panasonic GH1(7)
Nikon 50mm f1.4 Ai-s, Nikon 85mm f2 Ai-s, Nikon 105mm f2.5 Ai-s, Kowa 2X Anamorphic lens for Bell and Howell |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fourmix
Joined: 29 Oct 2009 Posts: 111
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fourmix wrote:
Beautiful examples !
Here a page about contax hoods
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/contax/shared/accessory/hoods.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Does anybody know wahat are difference between Contax Planar AE/MM and Contax N and ZF/ZE ? I`m wondering is AE/MM similar too N or N is similar to ZEZ/ZF? _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
download the pdf from Zeiss
the N is a different lens
the ZEZF seems a improved version of the contax and have 9 blades vs 8
http://www.zeiss.de/c12567a8003b0478/Contents-Frame/7d331e26befdd6f9c12570f500370493 _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Thx;) Interesting - so many versions _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Does anybody have a both Planars (zf/ze and c/y) and can compare this two lenses?I am really curious - i can afford only for c/y but maybe someday.. zf/ze - but i must know what are differences(other thans sharpness/ca)
i`m concentrated on rendering; 3d etc;) _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
karabud wrote: |
Does anybody have a both Planars (zf/ze and c/y) and can compare this two lenses?I am really curious - i can afford only for c/y but maybe someday.. zf/ze - but i must know what are differences(other thans sharpness/ca)
i`m concentrated on rendering; 3d etc;) |
I don't have the Z, so I can not compare, but you can't go wrong with the Contax. It is just so good. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Orio wrote: |
karabud wrote: |
Does anybody have a both Planars (zf/ze and c/y) and can compare this two lenses?I am really curious - i can afford only for c/y but maybe someday.. zf/ze - but i must know what are differences(other thans sharpness/ca)
i`m concentrated on rendering; 3d etc;) |
I don't have the Z, so I can not compare, but you can't go wrong with the Contax. It is just so good. |
Looking at your pictures i can`t disagree.
I will buy one asap;)
I`m only curious _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lichtstrom
Joined: 03 Jan 2010 Posts: 15 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lichtstrom wrote:
I also have the Contax-Version (not MM) and of my 20 lenses it's my favourite one. I use it on the 5D and only wide open with f1,4 for portraits and nature. I needed some practice to focus precisely because DOF is really short.
The most beautiful effect of the lens are the colours in combination with the 3-D-Effect, which is reduced when using f2 and nearly invisible @f2,8 in my opinion. If I want a sharp "normal" Portrait I use the Sigma 105/2,8 for example. If I want a "magic" portrait I use the 85/1,4. Take a photo of anything and you'll be surprised what this lens makes out of it.
When stopped down the blades look like stars, not very nice for the bokeh. The MM-Version is much better here. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ersatz
Joined: 29 May 2010 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
ersatz wrote:
karabud wrote: |
Does anybody have a both Planars (zf/ze and c/y) and can compare this two lenses?I am really curious - i can afford only for c/y but maybe someday.. zf/ze - but i must know what are differences(other thans sharpness/ca)
i`m concentrated on rendering; 3d etc;) |
I had a 85 AE and my friend has the 85ZE. Wide open the latter was maybe a tad bit sharper, especially in the corners. But at 1.4 is corner sharpness really that important? I find the AE to have more of the 3d effect but it's also more prone to CA and flaring. Also stopped down it has the ninja star bokeh so the ZE has the advantage there. I wouldn't bother with the ZE unless you have the money and like electronic aperture control which does give you more f-stops. But with the 50/1.4 and the 85/1.4 I would opt for the cheaper C/Y mounts.
And I didn't really care for the bokeh wide open so I sold it and got the rokinon 85/1.4 which is impressively sharp wide open and has nice creamy bokeh. Now I need the C/Y Sonnar 85/2.8 to compliment it.
Last edited by ersatz on Sun Jun 06, 2010 7:57 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|