Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Carl Zeiss Planar T* 1.2/55mm 100 Jahre
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:42 pm    Post subject: Carl Zeiss Planar T* 1.2/55mm 100 Jahre Reply with quote

Carl Zeiss Planar T* 1.2/55mm 100 Jahre
Lens made in West Germany

http://cgi.ebay.it/Planar-100-Jahre-Contax-ZEISS-T-55mm-F-1-2-55-f1-2-/380239142241?cmd=ViewItem&pt=Camera_Lenses&hash=item588804dd61#ht_6210wt_912


http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=380239142241&ru=http://shop.ebay.com:80/%3F_from%3DR40%26_trksid%3Dp3907.m570.l1313%26_nkw%3D380239142241%26_sacat%3DSee-All-Categories%26_fvi%3D1&_rdc=1#ht_6206wt_911

Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes

Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

Orio this lens is for you!!!! Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing


Last edited by metallaro1980 on Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:45 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dream lens + Collector's very rare item usually give high prices.

I've see it at around 3000Euros some time ago


PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes...its field curving is a bit less than classic Planar....
I am dreaming!!!!!


PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

this lens will never be used, collector item


PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey, I'm not Bill Gates ! Laughing


PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

if one had to decide between this and the new Noctilux 0,95, which one would you guys pick?


PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A lens that will never be used is a paperweight.
A spendy paperweight.

Sad.

I would use the hell out of it... if....
if...

Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad Crying or Very sad


PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hari wrote:
if one had to decide between this and the new Noctilux 0,95, which one would you guys pick?


Well, Noc costs even more but if money was no object - both.

K.


PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok..slightly OT. ...how 'bad' is this lens? how does it compare to other 50-lish F1.2? I would get a 50 f1 for that asking price.


PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unfortunately, its one or the other ... cant afford both


PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hari wrote:
Unfortunately, its one or the other ... cant afford both


Noct.


PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kram wrote:
A lens that will never be used is a paperweight.


+1

sad that most of this extremally good optics aren`t in use....it`s build for taking excellent lowlight/dof results..
I don`t understand collectors


PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ahhhh..... i had that one while on a dream the other day.
Hari, you are millionaire!


PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

a20010494 wrote:
Ahhhh..... i had that one while on a dream the other day.
Hari, you are millionaire!


No man, I just get lucky from time to time ...

MUST WATCH:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmG4X9PGOXs
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


PostPosted: Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rawhead wrote:
Hari wrote:
Unfortunately, its one or the other ... cant afford both


Noct.


Noct. +1. I'd personally rather have as wide an aperture as I could get to push my bokeh shots out there a little farther.


Noct. + Noct. = who's there?