First Roll of TMAX100 on Canon QL17

[djmike]

With the bad development in first roll of TMAX100 last time (http://forum.mflenses.com/first-roll-of-tmax100-on-canon-a1-t23817.html). This time I changed the store and used Canon QL17 GIII. Here they are. I am satisfied now.

[marty]

Hi, Mike.
These look definitely better. I like very much #2 and #3, perfectly geometric and symmetric. Nice tones also. Good job.

Cheers, M.-

[Nesster]

Excellent results - tone, contrast, sharpness, depth are all exemplary. Hope to see more!

Did the store scan these, or did you? A very good job (my pet filled home causes me to need to do a lot of dust blowing pre, and spotting post )

[fish4570]

Lovely, just lovely ...

[djmike]

Thanks for comment. I like them indeed, and QL17 is great. I have lot of fun from it. Mike

[Rolf]

This cam was named 20 years before "The poor mans´ Leica". You got perfect results. Congrats.

[Katastrofo]

Great results and grain is almost nonexistent. Have you thought of doing
your own developing?

[djmike]

[Nesster]

I keep my darkroom folded up in a bag, in the box where I keep my tank and in-use supplies. The whole thing sits in a cabinet, and comes out (in the kitchen) only when I'm developing film.

The "darkroom" is a darkroom film changing bag sold on ebay by roger_luo, these are the best, and is only required when putting film on the reel.

[martinsmith99]

Nice results.

Tmax has changed recently. Could this be the reason for the difference?

[eeyore_nl]

#2 and #3 are very good!

[Russ]

Nice. Well done.

[peterqd]

I like 'em too Mike. Great tones.