| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
madamasu
Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 597
Location: Frankfurt/Main Germany
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:01 pm Post subject: Have a look at this! |
 |
|
madamasu wrote:
Contax Planar 1.7/50:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/yoyo31/4438637772/sizes/o/
Thomas
_________________
Zorki 4
Jupiter 8, 9, 11, 12 & triple finder
Nikon D200, D700
Nikkors: 15/3.5 AI; N.C 24mm/2.8 (AIed);
N 35mm/1.4 (AIed); 45mm/2.8P; 50mm/1.2 AIS; Micro 55mm/2.8 AIS; Noct 58mm/1.2 AIS;85mm/1.8 (K-lense AIed); 105mm/2.5 AIS; 135mm/3.5 (K-lense AIed)
Voigtlaender Ultron 40mm/2; CZJ Flektogon 20mm/4 (AIed); Helios-81M; MIR-20N; Volna-3; Flektogon 50/4;Flektogon 65/2.8; Biometar 80/2.8; Biometar 120/2.8; Sonnar 180/2.8; Sonnar 300/4
Kiron 70-210/4.5 Makro
--------------------------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/madamasu |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 5084
Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:08 pm Post subject: Re: Have a look at this! |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Oooooooooooohhhhhhhh
LOVELY ! 
_________________
Olivier - Moderator 
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008
Posts: 6950
Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
That looks more like a mirror lens to me. The bokeh is too distracting for my tastes.
_________________
Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
womble
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 987
Location: Hertfordshire
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
womble wrote:
I'm not a bokeh connoisseur but it looks awful to me. If it wasn't for the main subject being sharp I would have said it suffered from terrible camera shake.
K.
_________________
Kris Lockyear
Digital: Pentax K-3iii
35mm film SLRs: various Pentax bodies from a H2 to a SF7, favourites the MX and LX
Rangefinder: Zeiss Super Ikonta IV, FED2, Zorkii-4, Industar 26m, Jupiter 8, 11 and 12 lenses
Medium format: various folders, Yashica Mat 124 G. Lubitel 2
LF: Horseman LE 5x4 view camera.
MF lenses (favourites) Pentax "K" 200mm f/2.5; "K" 135mm f/2.5; "K" 50mm f/1.2; "K" 35mm f/2; "K" 30mm f/2.8; "K" 28mm f/3.5 shift; "K" 15mm f/3.5; M 100mm f/2.8; M 40mm f/2.8; Jupiter-9 85mm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008
Posts: 1705
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
I find it really difficult to look at this image due to the incredibly annoying bokeh. Have never seen results like that from the Planar until now...
_________________
Canon EOS 5D / EOS 40D
Carl Zeiss Jena: Flektogon 2.8/20, 2.4/35, 2.8/35, Pancolar 2/50, MC 1.8/50, MC 1.8/80, Triotar 4/135, Tessar 2.8/50, S 4/135 1Q, S 3.5/135, Sonnar 3.5/135 MC, 2.8/180, Biotar 2/5,8cm, 2/58, 1.5/75
Carl Zeiss: Distagon 2/28 T*, 1.4/35 T*, Ultron 1.8/50, Tessar 2.8/50, Planar 1.4/50 T* MM, 1.7/50 T* MM, 1.4/85 T* AEG, Sonnar 2.8/135 T*
Asahi Optical Co.: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 2.8/120, 2.5/135 I & II, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4/300, 5.6/400, 4/45-125, 4.5/85-210, Super-Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4.5/70-150, Fish-Eye-Takumar 4/17, Macro-Takumar 4/50, Super-Macro Takumar 4/50, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 4/50, 4/100, Bellows-Takumar 4/100, Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 3.5/50, 2.4/58, 3.5/100, Asahi-Kogaku Tele-Takumar 3.5/135, Auto-Takumar 2.3/35, 3.5/35, 1.8/55, 1.8/55 (Zebra), 2/55, 2.2/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, Takumar 4/35, 2.2/55, 2/58, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 5.6/200, 6.3/300, SMC Takumar 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, SMC-M 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 2/50
Tomioka: Tominon 2/5cm, Auto-Chinon 3.5/21, 1.4/55, Auto-Yashinon DS-M 1.2/55 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lazzaros
Joined: 15 Jul 2008
Posts: 975
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lazzaros wrote:
The bokeh "perfection" is about personal taste I think.
I like this one, looks like a painture to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 10472
Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
I never used my 50:1.7 by night, look strange to me
_________________
T* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
egidio
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 222
Location: slovenia
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
egidio wrote:
nice bokeh but why does it look like mirror lens? Are you sure that's the right lens? It doesnt look like f1.7 to me
_________________
I use: Flektogon 2.8/20, Flektogon 2.8/35, planar 50mm/1.4, Takumar 1.4/50mm, Takumar 1.9/85, MIR 24H, Mir1v, Industar-50-2, Helios-44-2, Pentacon 2.8/135, cyclop 85 1.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thePiRaTE!!
Joined: 31 Oct 2008
Posts: 416
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2010 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thePiRaTE!! wrote:
| martinsmith99 wrote: |
| That looks more like a mirror lens to me. The bokeh is too distracting for my tastes. |
I agree, though I like the unique bokeh personally.
I hypothesize that the photographer has added something to the Planar, perhaps by placing an opaque spot in the center of the front element and using a wide aperture, it would cause such an artifact in the bokeh much like the mirror lens.
I'm up to my ears in housework or I'd try it.
K.
_________________
kellysereda.com
Sony A7ii, A900, NEX-5
_______________________
Helios: 1.5/85 40-2.
Meyer-Optik: Trioplan 2.8/100, Oreston 1.8/50.
Minolta: Rokkor-PG 1.2/58.
Porst: 1.2/55 Color Reflex.
Sony: 4-5.6/70-400 G.
Takumar: Super Takumar 3.5/135, Super Takumar 1.4/50, SMC Takumar 3.5/28.
Topcon: Topcor 1.4/58.
Voigtländer: Nokton Classic SC 1.4/35.
Zeiss: Planar T*1.2/85 "60 jahre" C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*3.4/35-70 C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*2.8/16-35 ZA, Distagon T*2/24 ZA.
lenses for sale here |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Berlin, DE
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
It's obviously a mirror lens. The long focal length is also visible from the very composition of the shot.
_________________
List of lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
madamasu
Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 597
Location: Frankfurt/Main Germany
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
madamasu wrote:
In the EXIF-data it says: Contax Planar 50mm F 1.7 T* AEJ.
So what does AEJ mean?
He has two more portraits, all showing the same characteristics. I like the portrait of th boy very much an think it is one of the nicest portraits I have seen. As Lazzaros said, like a painting.
Thomas
_________________
Zorki 4
Jupiter 8, 9, 11, 12 & triple finder
Nikon D200, D700
Nikkors: 15/3.5 AI; N.C 24mm/2.8 (AIed);
N 35mm/1.4 (AIed); 45mm/2.8P; 50mm/1.2 AIS; Micro 55mm/2.8 AIS; Noct 58mm/1.2 AIS;85mm/1.8 (K-lense AIed); 105mm/2.5 AIS; 135mm/3.5 (K-lense AIed)
Voigtlaender Ultron 40mm/2; CZJ Flektogon 20mm/4 (AIed); Helios-81M; MIR-20N; Volna-3; Flektogon 50/4;Flektogon 65/2.8; Biometar 80/2.8; Biometar 120/2.8; Sonnar 180/2.8; Sonnar 300/4
Kiron 70-210/4.5 Makro
--------------------------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/madamasu |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 1387
Location: Berlin, DE
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
| madamasu wrote: |
In the EXIF-data it says: Contax Planar 50mm F 1.7 T* AEJ.
So what does AEJ mean? |
AE type, made in Japan. However, EXIF can say anything (anything can be programmed into an adapter) - the shot is taken with a different lens. A mirror lens, I would say.
_________________
List of lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MF-addicted
Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 803
Location: Stuttgart (Germany)
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
MF-addicted wrote:
| thePiRaTE!! wrote: |
I hypothesize that the photographer has added something to the Planar, perhaps by placing an opaque spot in the center of the front element and using a wide aperture, it would cause such an artifact in the bokeh much like the mirror lens.
|
... that's my opinion, too. The donought circle in the out of focus area is caused by diffraction on a centered element, like the secondary mirror of a mirror lens. The appearance of the Airy disc (diffraction phenomena) is not round shaped, it is donought shaped. Can be done by aligning some black or opaque circle on a clear filter (UV etc) in front of the lens.
See Airy disc:
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/diffraction-photography.htm
Create your own bokeh:
Like this, but the other way round, only blocking the center part.
http://www.diyphotography.net/diy_create_your_own_bokeh
_________________
EOS 5D MK II, EOS 5D Classic, EOS 400D --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon FD to EOS converted: FD 1,4/24 asph, FD 2,8/300 L
Carl Zeiss Jena:Pancolar 2/50, black Biotar 2/5,8cm 17bl., slim Biotar 1,5/7,5cm 18bl., Pancolar 1,8/80mm, Sonnar 3,5/135, Triotar 4/135
Carl Zeiss: Distagon 4/18T*, Distagon 1,4/35 HFT, Planar 1,4/50 T*, Vario-Sonnar 3,4/35-70 T*,Vario-Sonnar 4,5-5,6/100-300 T*
Leitz: Elmarit-R 2.8/28 E55 II, Summicron-R 35 I, Elmarit-R Wetzlar 2.8/35 E55 II, Summicron-R 2/50 Wetzlar I, Macro Elmarit-R 2.8/60 I, Summicron-R 2/90 E55 I, Elmarit-R 2,8/90 I, Elmarit-R Wetzlar 2,8/135 I, Elmarit-R 2.8/180 Wetzlar E67 II, Vario Elmar 4/70-210 E60, MR Telyt-R 8/500
Schneider: Xenar 2.8/50
Russian: Industar 50-2, Industar 61,Helios-44-1 2/58mm,Helios-44-2 2/58mm, MC 3M-5CA 8/500
Meyer: Pentacon 3,5/30, Domiplan 2,8/50, Trioplan 2,9/50, Trioplan 3,5/75, Trioplan 2,8/100, Orestor 2,8/135mm, Orestegon 4/200
ISCO: Westron 2,8/35, Westron 3,5/35, Tele-Westanar 3,5/135, Tele-Westanar 4/180
Yashica: ML 15, ML 21, ML 24, ML 28, ML 35, ML 100/3.5 Macro,
Nikon: Nikkor AI 2,0/24, Nikkor AIS 2,0/28, Nikkor Ai 1,8/50, Nikkor-P (Sonnar) 2,5/105 silver, Nikkor-P (Gauss) 2,5/105 black
Steinheil Cassar 3,5-4,5/75 VL, Quinar 3,5/85, Culminar 4,5/105, Culminar 4,5/135, Auto-D Tele Quinar 2,8/135
Tomioka Tomioka - Cosinon 1,2/55, Tomioka - Revuenon 1,4/55
Voigtländer: Septon 2/50
Others: Officine Galileo Ingra 3,5/5cm, Wilon 4,5/75, Dallmeyer 4,5/4", Bonotar 4,5/105,
Lenses for sale, please contact via PM: None at the moment
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
madamasu
Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 597
Location: Frankfurt/Main Germany
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
madamasu wrote:
I wrote Yoyo a mail and that's what he answered:
"The picture was taken by the "Contax Planar 1.7/50" lens really. But the lens had added a matal slice in the rear elements set. The capture photo is amusing, seems like the mirror lens. You can visit the following site,
www.wretch.cc/blog/pipemore7/4772637
"AEJ" means: "AE" type and made in Japen."
Thomas
_________________
Zorki 4
Jupiter 8, 9, 11, 12 & triple finder
Nikon D200, D700
Nikkors: 15/3.5 AI; N.C 24mm/2.8 (AIed);
N 35mm/1.4 (AIed); 45mm/2.8P; 50mm/1.2 AIS; Micro 55mm/2.8 AIS; Noct 58mm/1.2 AIS;85mm/1.8 (K-lense AIed); 105mm/2.5 AIS; 135mm/3.5 (K-lense AIed)
Voigtlaender Ultron 40mm/2; CZJ Flektogon 20mm/4 (AIed); Helios-81M; MIR-20N; Volna-3; Flektogon 50/4;Flektogon 65/2.8; Biometar 80/2.8; Biometar 120/2.8; Sonnar 180/2.8; Sonnar 300/4
Kiron 70-210/4.5 Makro
--------------------------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/madamasu |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
It remind me the bokeh of the Fujinon 4/85 SF wide open or F/5,6.
I don't like it. Perhap in preparated pic, with background ad-hoc and especial subject.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7584
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Adding a "floating" disc behind the aperture ring will change the lens bookeh to a circular shape. By the way, you can try any shape as your Like too.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hexi
Joined: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 1631
Location: France
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hexi wrote:
Nice expression and lens , but crap background.
_________________
Happy owner and user of :
SLR's > Contax Aria - RX
DSLR > Canon 5D
Lenses : C/Y Planar 1.4/50 - Distagon 2.8/35 - Planar 1.4/85
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sonnar85 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009
Posts: 552
Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
Looks like it's a refection off the window behind the child.
_________________
Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
natebarnz
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 331
Location: Los Angeles / Tucson
Expire: 2013-01-23
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
natebarnz wrote:
I like this photograph a lot. The bokeh is very interesting and captivating to look at. It does take away from the subject at first but once you focus in on the subject it really stands out nicely.
I'm a fan!
_________________
500D / SPII / FTn / Contax D / 137MA / Contaflex
Contax 28/2 - 35/1.4 - 35/2.8 - 45/2.8 - 50/1.4 - 100/3.5 - 135/2.8
CZJ 20/4 - 35/2.8 - 50/2.8 - 58/2 - 135/3.5
Rokkor PG 58/1.2 - PF 58/1.4 - X 85/1.7
Nikkor S 55/1.2 - H 85/1.8 - P.C. 55/3.5
Helios 44-2 58/2 Meyer Oreston 50/1.8
Elmarit-R 90/2.8 Sears 55/1.4
--> Visit My Picasa Galleries <-- |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009
Posts: 1525
Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
Eye of the beholder, YMMV, yada yada, /disclaimer
I love bokeh. I love a lot of the bokeh that people here would consider ugly. I like over-done bokeh, I like swirly bokeh, I like psychedelic bokeh (e.g., Trioplan bokeh), I like rugby-ball bokeh, I like buttery smooth (or, to some, *mushy* bokeh, e.g., Sony/Minolta STF), I like 'em all.
Except this one. Even to me, the BG here is butt-ugly.
_________________
Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
folderholder
Joined: 24 Jan 2010
Posts: 102
Location: California
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
folderholder wrote:
The bokeh is offbeat but I think it's fine here. The circular background shapes mimic the boy's expression and make a puzzling but interesting connection. There's a kind of frantic energy to the image which could fit a child's view of a busy urban environment. I like the colors, too.
I don't know what possessed the photographer to alter his lens in this way. It might be difficult to come up with another image where the mod works as well as it does in this one.
_________________
Best wishes,
Peter
www.pandacollector.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
madamasu
Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 597
Location: Frankfurt/Main Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
madamasu wrote:
+1 I love it
Thomas
There are a few more on his flickr pages. I don't know, why he went all the way to alter his lense like this, but it seems, he likes trying out new things.
_________________
Zorki 4
Jupiter 8, 9, 11, 12 & triple finder
Nikon D200, D700
Nikkors: 15/3.5 AI; N.C 24mm/2.8 (AIed);
N 35mm/1.4 (AIed); 45mm/2.8P; 50mm/1.2 AIS; Micro 55mm/2.8 AIS; Noct 58mm/1.2 AIS;85mm/1.8 (K-lense AIed); 105mm/2.5 AIS; 135mm/3.5 (K-lense AIed)
Voigtlaender Ultron 40mm/2; CZJ Flektogon 20mm/4 (AIed); Helios-81M; MIR-20N; Volna-3; Flektogon 50/4;Flektogon 65/2.8; Biometar 80/2.8; Biometar 120/2.8; Sonnar 180/2.8; Sonnar 300/4
Kiron 70-210/4.5 Makro
--------------------------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/madamasu |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7584
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
| madamasu wrote: |
+1 I love it
Thomas
There are a few more on his flickr pages. I don't know, why he went all the way to alter his lense like this, but it seems, he likes trying out new things. |
He is a lover of the Pinhole camera/lens. With such alternation, a normal lens could take similar photos as the pinhole lens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thePiRaTE!!
Joined: 31 Oct 2008
Posts: 416
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thePiRaTE!! wrote:
Like anything distinctive, some will like, some will not, but many will notice. I think it's safe to say - his effort has succeeded in this regard.
Otoh, as a photographer, I find it hard to be objective on whether I like it because it adds interest based on its actual appeal or simply because of it's technical qualities. In the end, I wonder if Joe Blow would even notice, lol.
K.
_________________
kellysereda.com
Sony A7ii, A900, NEX-5
_______________________
Helios: 1.5/85 40-2.
Meyer-Optik: Trioplan 2.8/100, Oreston 1.8/50.
Minolta: Rokkor-PG 1.2/58.
Porst: 1.2/55 Color Reflex.
Sony: 4-5.6/70-400 G.
Takumar: Super Takumar 3.5/135, Super Takumar 1.4/50, SMC Takumar 3.5/28.
Topcon: Topcor 1.4/58.
Voigtländer: Nokton Classic SC 1.4/35.
Zeiss: Planar T*1.2/85 "60 jahre" C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*3.4/35-70 C/Y, Vario-Sonnar T*2.8/16-35 ZA, Distagon T*2/24 ZA.
lenses for sale here |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tuananhmap
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 130
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tuananhmap wrote:
I don't know what happen with this lense, bokeh like mirror lense but it is exactly mirror lense.
But the child is so lovely ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
