Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

IR CU Grassscape
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:29 am    Post subject: IR CU Grassscape Reply with quote

After the snow melted:



40D, Mamiya Secor 80mm MF, MF

Jules


PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like that!


PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

waterdrops on grass in IR, I like the idea.

The whitebalace you have chosen dilutes the idea IMHO since it is mainly reddish grey overall.
Some contrast correction and gamma enhancement would bring out much more....(also IMHO)

These are ideas as IR has no "color" (and I will remove them asap as per your wish of course...) I use for my IR shots at times...





PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

martinsmith99 wrote:
I like that!


Thank You Martin.


PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Klaus,

I tend to prefer a more subtle approach in IR, although I do like what you did here. Wild Cool !!!!

Cheers

Jules


PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From a total IR illiterate: is IR supposed to bring out something invisible from this type of shots, or does it simply give a different colourization pattern?


PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The latter Orio. Grass (green foliage) usually gets white, the sky gets very dark, skins get very soft and like tranparent looking, eyes get dark just to name a few. But it severely depends on which filter used. The deeper one gets into IR (longer wavelengths) usually all color disappear (this is a sensor side effect!) and a very contrasty bw picture remains.

Here some good info and examples:
http://www.dpfwiw.com/ir.htm#ir_filters

http://www.lifepixel.com/digital-infrared/samples.html


PostPosted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

lulalake wrote:
Hi Klaus,

I tend to prefer a more subtle approach in IR, although I do like what you did here. Wild Cool !!!!

Cheers

Jules


Well I have to admit I like that at times (a side effect of my UV work), but also the subtle tones are very interesting.

Try a female portrait once, the skin gets ultra soft looking ("porcelain" type look, since IR penetrates the surface much deeper than normal light; UV does exactly the opposite - don't use with females or get killed...LOL), hair looks very nice too and eyes get a very deep dark look. Here's an example: (URL since I don't want to hijack the thread) http://bighugelabs.com/onblack.php?id=4018426642&size=large